Saturday, February 8, 2014
game preview: Georgia Tech
Date/Time: Saturday, February 8; 12:00
TV: ACC Network, ESPN3
Record against the Jackets: 35-39
Last meeting: UVA 82, GT 54; 2/24/13, Charlottesville
Last game: UVA 76, BC 66 (2/5); Clem. 45, GT 41 (2/4)
KenPom:
Tempo:
UVA: 62.8 (#337)
GT: 67.2 (#160)
Offense:
UVA: 109.1 (#85)
GT: 102.5 (#208)
Defense:
UVA: 87.6 (#3)
GT: 98.3 (#61)
Pythag:
UVA: .9257 (#10)
GT: .6182 (#112)
Projected lineups:
Virginia:
PG: London Perrantes (4.4 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 3.7 apg)
SG: Malcolm Brogdon (12.0 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 2.4 apg)
SF: Joe Harris (11.3 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 2.2 apg)
PF: Akil Mitchell (6.8 ppg, 6.7 rpg, 1.3 apg)
C: Mike Tobey (7.3 ppg, 4.3 rpg, 0.4 apg)
Georgia Tech:
PG: Trae Golden (14.0 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 3.3 apg)
SG: Corey Heyward (0.8 ppg, 1.2 rpg, 1.2 apg)
SF: Marcus Georges-Hunt (12.4 ppg, 4.3 rpg, 2.3 apg)
PF: Kammeon Holsey (7.2 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 0.7 apg)
C: Daniel Miller (11.3 ppg, 8.0 rpg, 1.3 apg)
UVA's slog through February continues. The Boston College game was mostly the blowout it should've been, except for the end which UVA decided to make interesting by easing off the gas pedal. I did say BC could make some runs on offense. I'm hoping that the end result is the best of both worlds: a win and a wake-up call, the latter of which is occasionally necessary.
Three of the next four are on the road, starting Saturday in Atlanta. Georgia Tech has been slammed with injuries this season and it's shown on the stat sheet. It's caused them to struggle in ACC play more than they probably should've, as losses to NC State and Miami have hurt the bottom line. They'll be hoping that a four-game homestand rights the ship somewhat.
-- UVA on offense
GT's big center Daniel Miller didn't make last year's all-defense team in the ACC by accident. Miller is one of the toughest customers in the post in the whole conference; he checks in at 6'11", 275, and has been an outstanding shot-blocker his entire four-year career. At any time Miller is in the game, which is about 30 minutes of it, he's a hugely disruptive presence in the post.
He's one guy, though. You can pass around or shoot over one guy. GT might, maybe, who knows, get back power forward Robert Carter. Carter has missed all ten games of the ACC season with a torn meniscus, and his absence has been keenly felt. Were he to return, he would give the Jackets a second shot-blocker inside, as well as an absolutely elite rebounding presence - one that might be slowed a bit by rust and rehab, but much better than any of GT's other frontcourt options. Kammeon Holsey is no shotblocker and bench forward Quinton Stephens is a total stick at 6'8', 184. Even without Carter, GT is a very good defensive rebounding team, thanks to Miller and Holsey, but Carter would give Akil Mitchell some fierce battles down low.
Whether UVA can actually score down low depends partly on Carter. Without him, even Miller hasn't been able to keep opponents off the scoresheet just by himself. GT was one of the best teams in the country in 2-point D before the ACC season and one of the worst in the conference since conference play began.
On our side of the ball, Malcolm Brogdon has been doing what Joe Harris did last year: have a big game, and then have a bigger one, and then a bigger one. His stat line against BC was a little bit of everything and a lot of some things. Now that he's going home to play in front of family and friends, you have to think he wouldn't mind giving them a little show. Lately, GT has been starting freshman Corey Heyward at shooting guard, for reasons both of thinness and shaking up the lineup; Heyward is a smallish, quick player, but UVA will clearly look to take advantage of Heyward's inexperience.
-- UVA on defense
There's a slim chance GT won't have point guard Trae Golden available for the game. He aggravated a groin injury in GT's win over Wake Forest and sat out the Clemson game. Life without Golden was pretty crappy for the Jackets - they scored 41 points in the loss to Clemson.
GT is so totally screwed if they don't have Golden that it'd be not even worth doing any analysis. Just call it game over. So for the sake of the narrative, we'll assume they do. Even if on the court, Golden may be limited, the driving portion of his game taken somewhat away if he's worried about his groin. And GT might not want him playing 30 minutes, either. When Golden's not in, the point belongs to Corey Heyward, who isn't ready and will probably get chewed up and spit out by UVA's defense.
The Jackets are just an inefficient team on the whole, though. They lack a three-point threat - their best shooter was Solomon Poole, recently kicked off the team. Golden is an OK shooter but has never displayed good shot discipline. Chris Bolden, in and out of the starting lineup at shooting guard, is just an awful shooter in general.
If GT would run more of their offense through Daniel Miller, they might have better success. Miller's size makes him tough to stop, and he's got a little bit of range too. This is a guy who used to be kind of a schmutz on offense, but has reduced his turnovers and improved his shooting every year, and has become a real weapon.
Carter, if he plays, can also score down low, and Kammeon Holsey brings a pretty good midrange game, but also gets in foul trouble and turns the ball over too much. The rest of this team? Mainly volume scorers. Marcus Georges-Hunt is second on the team in ppg, but first in minutes and shots and only shooting .416. GT as a whole doesn't shoot well, particularly threes, turns the ball over too much, and doesn't do a hot job at drawing fouls, either. If Carter is in the game, they can be a little more multi-dimensional, but Golden is likely to be somewhat limited, which gives back the whole gain from Carter and then some.
-- Outlook
Any team that plays less than efficient offense is a great matchup for UVA. UVA's defense is designed to make you inefficient. The longer the possession, the more likely you are to turn it over, and UVA specializes in long possessions; you generally get one shot because UVA rebounds so damn well; often that shot's a crappy one for a long multitude of reasons. When playing a team that already turns it over too much, can't rebound on offense, and shoots badly, things ain't likely to go well for said opponent. Carter's presence might improve their offensive rebounding, but without him they've been 13th out of 15 in conference play. As long as UVA can shake off the travel and the early game time - and they already waltzed into Notre Dame and laid down the stick after having to bus in from Chicago during some kind of polar vortex whirlpool death blizzard, so I think they can handle balmy Atlanta (assuming the poor city has recovered from their own apocalyptic brush with winter) - they should be just fine.
Final score: UVA 68, GT 54
Friday, February 7, 2014
2010 recruiting class in review
Looking for the ACC sims? You'll find 'em if you know where to look.
For the second year in a row, here's a chance to step in the ol' wayback machine and revisit an old recruiting class. This is the 2010 class, the second one this blog tracked, and the bridge class between the Groh and London eras. It was a pretty rough year for recruiting. Not counting the two prep holdovers from the previous year (Morgan Moses and Cody Wallace) UVA had all of nine commitments by the time the season began. Groh was able to scrape one more, and then London had to scrounge around to fill the rest. It was a relatively small class and thoroughly lacking in the recruiting-stars department, mostly the low-three-star 5.5 rating as Rivals saw it, with only two players (besides Moses) above that.
The stars next to each name are what Rivals gave the player, just for consistency's sake with last year.
DECOMMITMENTS (1)
QB Tyler Brosius *** (Tuscola - NC)
Short version: Now a minor-league baseball player.
It's a little surprising that a transition class saw just the one decommitment, and none in the wake of the coaching change. Brosius committed in June but backed out in October, possibly after seeing the 0-3 start to the season that UVA pulled off, including the William & Mary loss. His destination was NC State.
At NC State, he lasted two years. He redshirted 2010, got a little mop-up duty in 2011, and then transferred out in the summer of 2012. Mike Glennon had one more year left, and Tom O'Brien had brought in freshman Manny Stocker (who himself left the NC State program this past winter) and Colorado State transfer Pete Thomas, the Pack's 2013 starter. Brosius departed for Walters State, a juco in Tennessee, to switch to a baseball career. There, he pitched in long relief and then was drafted last summer by the Atlanta Braves. It looks like a solid decision; the road to the bigs is tough for a 21st-round relief pitcher, but Brosius pitched well enough to earn a promotion from rookie leagues to low-A ball in the Braves' organization near the end of the 2013 season.
DIDN'T MAKE IT THIS FAR (4)
FB Ryan Cobb ** (Don Bosco - NJ)
Short version: Career backup TE at Delaware
Recruited as a linebacker, Cobb was switched to fullback by the London regime, redshirted one season, and then decided to transfer mid-camp 2011. He went to Delaware, where he was able to play right away, and was slotted at tight end by the Blue Hens.
Cobb has never been a regular for Delaware, catching 17 passes across the past three seasons, and has one more year of eligibility. He hasn't been wasting his time, though; he was picked as one of 22 Allstate Good Works team members this past season, and his Delaware bio notes that he's a ridiculously good bowler.
QB Mike Rocco ** (Liberty Christian - VA)
Short version: Moderately successful but unable to win over coaches or fans.
I think we're all pretty familiar with the story. Through no fault of his own, Rocco was one of the most polarizing members of the team, thanks to his battle with Phillip Sims in 2012. Before that, he had played some mop-up time as a true freshman, then battled it out with David Watford in 2011 before winning the job and guiding UVA to the Peach Bowl. Rocco left upon feeling he wouldn't get a fair shake, which is almost certainly at least partly true, and transferred to Richmond to play for his uncle. NCAA rules forbade him from playing this year, so, having not yet redshirted, he'll have one season left this fall.
WR E.J. Scott *** (Good Counsel - MD)
Short version: Talented but overlooked.
Almost unfair to put him here, having only announced his transfer a few weeks ago. Scott had a mini-breakout in 2012 after missing 2011 with an injury, catching 29 passes for 390 yards, but for whatever reason couldn't get on the field in 2013 and had only three catches. If I were one to judge I'd call it poor judgment by the coaching staff, given how badly the rest of the receiving corps played. Scott will finish his football career at Wake Forest as a grad student. A little bit of a wasted talent here, the blame for which falls on the coaches.
QB Michael Strauss *** (Gulliver Prep - FL)
Short version: Biggest loser in QB shuffle found his spot at Richmond.
Strauss was London's first-ever recruit at UVA and early-enrolled in 2010. He never threw a pass in a game at UVA; he finished fourth in a four-way competition in 2011 and transferred to Richmond after the season. One imagines he might be a touch annoyed at having to compete with Rocco again, but he got himself a head start this past season. His stat line: 3,808 yards, 26 TDs, 8 INTs, 65.4% completion rate, and 318 yards per game. UVA's loss was definitely Richmond's gain here, and Strauss, like the others, has one final year of eligibility.
NEVER PANNED OUT (4)
S Pablo Alvarez *** (Belen Jesuit - FL)
Short version: Injury-riddled.
The extent of Alvarez's career at UVA was three defensive plays and a couple special teams appearances, all against Richmond in 2012. He spent too much time on the training table, with a season-ending shoulder injury in 2011 and a season-ending knee injury following those Richmond plays. With players on the bottom of the depth chart, sometimes there's less urgency to hurry him up in rehab, so what might be a six-week injury for a starter sometimes becomes season-ending for a fourth-stringer. This is not to doubt the extent of Alvarez's injuries, because we really have no idea. Regardless, Alvarez's career was snakebit, and his 2013 blurb on his bio says "spent the season as a student assistant." He quietly disappeared from the roster during the offseason, either by not being asked back for a fifth year or just deciding it wasn't worth the bother, or both.
WR Miles Gooch *** (Towers HS - GA)
Short version: Lightly-used wide receiver.
Gooch was one of the large passel of quarterbacks London brought in after his hiring, but only spent a brief time there before becoming a WR. He hasn't been totally invisible, and really has been easily the most well-known member of this category. His career totals as a receiver. though: 3 catches for 32 yards and a touchdown. He appeared in every game in 2013, and has some leftover potential to make a jump from this category in 2014 for his fifth season. But so far he's been mainly a blocking receiver and generally a replacement-level player.
S Kyrrel Latimer ** (DeMatha - MD)
Short version: Ghost.
Has never appeared in a game for UVA, and spent 2013 in some kind of weird limbo, possibly academics-related although that's nothing more than idle speculation on my part.
DE Stephen Lawe ** (Maury HS - VA)
Short version: Almost ghost.
Got into his first game action this past year as a redshirt junior, at the end of three blowouts. (One by us and two of us.) If London finds himself with less attrition than expected, he and Latimer would be prime candidates to be disinvited.
USEFUL (3)
RB Khalek Shepherd *** (Gwynn Park HS - MD)
Short version: Worked his way into a role as a change-of-pace tailback.
Shepherd's was a weird recruitment. His name literally did not come up for months, so I gave up and took him off the recruiting board, only for him to commit a couple weeks later. Al Groh's last ever. With one season left on his clock, Shepherd has become a decent change-of-pace back for UVA. He had 19 carries in 2012 and then really emerged in 2013 with 51 carries for 304 yards. It so happens that Shepherd holds the UVA single-season record for kick-return yardage, set in 2012.
I'd rather expect him to fit in a similar role this coming season as a senior. He won't unseat Kevin Parks and he'll face a major threat from Taquan Mizzell, but he was a consistent presence last year (best game: 10 carries for 81 yards against Maryland) and has carved himself a nice little role.
TE Zach Swanson *** (Katy - TX)
Short version: Should never have been a fullback, but is solid as a backup TE.
A pleasant late-cycle surprise, Swanson found himself jettisoned from Stanford, who gave him the ol' we-suggest-you-look-elsewhere routine in January. Forced to fend for himself, Swanson contacted several programs and ended up at UVA just a couple days before Signing Day.
An ill-conceived move to fullback set back his development, but he settled in at tight end, made some minimal contributions in 2012, and finally emerged this season as a quality backup, catching 19 passes for 173 yards.
S Rijo Walker *** (Bethel HS - VA)
Short version: Somewhat up-and-down occasional starter and career backup at safety.
One of the few members of this class not to redshirt, Walker spent basically his whole career as a backup safety with a sprinkling of starts here and there. An athletic interception as a sophomore against Indiana, early in the 2011 season, gave fans reason to believe in a bright future, and there was a general clamor for him to see more playing time. He played less in 2012 than in 2011, and moved into sort of a platoon in 2013 for a little while due to shaky play from Brandon Phelps; unfortunately, there were a few plays out of Walker that illustrated why he wasn't wresting the job away. Walker never really earned the full trust of the coaches, but he played well in stretches too.
CORE OF THE TEAM (2)
DT Chris Brathwaite *** (Holy Cross HS - NY)
Short version: Explosive DT who lost a year to academic ineligibility.
Based on results to date, I can't help but place him here (and considered putting him in the "useful" category), but Brathwaite has potential to be considered a star before his career is over. Originally recruited as a 250-pound linebacker (likely the Darryl Blackstock rush linebacker) he was quickly moved to DE in the 4-3 defense and then inside to DT. His 2012 season was a terrific one; even though he never started a game, he led the team in TFL with 10.5 and made everyone drool about what he might do the year after.
That turned out to be classwork on the road back to eligibility. Some players just decide to leave if the school decides they're not eligible to keep studying, and you can't really blame them, but Brathwaite took the Jameel Sewell path and worked his way back for his senior year. Having been rather excited about Brathwaite's potential ever since he signed on, I've been more than happy about his return. Given the off-year of no football, a repeat of his 2012 performance may be hard to achieve, but the chances of another explosive breakout year are just as high.
OT Conner Davis *** (Deep Run HS - VA)
Short version: Starter at left guard
Davis is no superstar, and probably not an NFL candidate when his eligibility is up after 2014. That said, two years going on three as a starter at left guard clearly makes him one of the top members of the class. He now has 20 starts under his belt and would have more if he hadn't missed a chunk of games in the middle of 2013 with an injury. Davis is no Branden Albert, but he's steady and often invisible, the latter of which is a perfectly good trait for an offensive guard. If I had a complaint it'd be that UVA needs much more strength and push out of the interior line than it gets, but Davis is good in pass protection and very technically sound.
STARS (3)
LB Henry Coley *** (Bayside HS - VA)
Short version: Starting linebacker and team tackle leader
Coley's progression through the ranks has been remarkable. His first start was as a redshirt freshman, in the Peach Bowl, an indication of the high opinion the coaching staff has had of him, even when he played only five games that year. Ever since then he's been a starter, only missing time with injury, and progressed from a respectable, solid player in 2012 as a sophomore to the team's tackle leader in 2013. He and Daquan Romero were nothing short of rocks this past season, and their playmaking kept UVA in a lot of games. Coley is one of the football-smartest players on the team, and it shows.
TE Jake McGee ** (Collegiate School - VA)
Like Gooch, McGee was recruited as a quarterback, but quickly found a new position. He redshirted 2010 and had a thoroughly uneventful 2011, mainly as a special-teamer, until breaking onto the scene early in 2012. He did so by simultaneously drawing a pass-interference penalty and making a leaping, one-handed, 40-yard-bomb reception that rescued a floundering attempt at a game-winning drive against Penn State, a game which UVA eventually won. Another athletic game-winning grab against Miami pretty much cemented his rep.
Leading UVA in receiving wasn't really a hard task in 2013, but someone had to do it, and McGee did, with 43 catches and 395 yards. What little semblance of a passing game UVA had depended extremely heavily on McGee's athleticism. His blocking is a little suspect, so he's really more of a big, hand-on-the-ground receiver, but clearly indispensible all the same.
RB Kevin Parks *** (West Rowan HS - NC)
Short version: First 1,000-yard rusher since 2004.
I don't need to say much more than that, but I will. Parks ran for insane amounts of yardage in high school, routinely piling up 200 and 300 yard games and ultimately setting a national record in that regard. For his career he was just shy of 11,000 yards. Utterly amazing. So it should come as no surprise that Parks broke a futility streak at the running back position for UVA by piling up yards in college, too. Parks was a true workhorse, carrying 227 times and catching 38 passes, too, and the ACC media noticed and made him the second-team back. He's already put himself on a pedestal among UVA backs like Wali Lundy and Alvin Pearman and another 1,000-yard season ought to move him even higher in the estimation of the critics.
****************************************************
If you were counting, there were five players in the "core" and "stars" category, which makes the 2010 class a low performer. Last year, we found that 2009 produced ten such players, and four "useful" ones instead of three. And that was with some high-profile busts like Quintin Hunter and Dominique Wallace. None of this should be surprising considering the coaching change.
What I found interesting was the lack of any complete fadeaways, disciplinary problems, and dismissals. Nobody got kicked off the team except Brathwaite, and he's been working hard to make up for it. You might say "that's because London was now recruiting these guys" but London is responsible for only about half the class. Even the players who left, or decommitted, ended up as pretty high-character guys and didn't find themselves in handcuffs at any time, unlike various examples from 2009.
However. The general lightness on useful-or-better players is part of the reason for UVA's current swoon. It's not one bit of an excuse, because lots of programs go through coaching changes and don't go 2-10 four years later, but it's still a reason. It makes one hope that if 2015 is another coaching-change class, it won't be as light on both quantity and quality of its players.
For the second year in a row, here's a chance to step in the ol' wayback machine and revisit an old recruiting class. This is the 2010 class, the second one this blog tracked, and the bridge class between the Groh and London eras. It was a pretty rough year for recruiting. Not counting the two prep holdovers from the previous year (Morgan Moses and Cody Wallace) UVA had all of nine commitments by the time the season began. Groh was able to scrape one more, and then London had to scrounge around to fill the rest. It was a relatively small class and thoroughly lacking in the recruiting-stars department, mostly the low-three-star 5.5 rating as Rivals saw it, with only two players (besides Moses) above that.
The stars next to each name are what Rivals gave the player, just for consistency's sake with last year.
DECOMMITMENTS (1)
QB Tyler Brosius *** (Tuscola - NC)
Short version: Now a minor-league baseball player.
It's a little surprising that a transition class saw just the one decommitment, and none in the wake of the coaching change. Brosius committed in June but backed out in October, possibly after seeing the 0-3 start to the season that UVA pulled off, including the William & Mary loss. His destination was NC State.
At NC State, he lasted two years. He redshirted 2010, got a little mop-up duty in 2011, and then transferred out in the summer of 2012. Mike Glennon had one more year left, and Tom O'Brien had brought in freshman Manny Stocker (who himself left the NC State program this past winter) and Colorado State transfer Pete Thomas, the Pack's 2013 starter. Brosius departed for Walters State, a juco in Tennessee, to switch to a baseball career. There, he pitched in long relief and then was drafted last summer by the Atlanta Braves. It looks like a solid decision; the road to the bigs is tough for a 21st-round relief pitcher, but Brosius pitched well enough to earn a promotion from rookie leagues to low-A ball in the Braves' organization near the end of the 2013 season.
DIDN'T MAKE IT THIS FAR (4)
FB Ryan Cobb ** (Don Bosco - NJ)
Short version: Career backup TE at Delaware
Recruited as a linebacker, Cobb was switched to fullback by the London regime, redshirted one season, and then decided to transfer mid-camp 2011. He went to Delaware, where he was able to play right away, and was slotted at tight end by the Blue Hens.
Cobb has never been a regular for Delaware, catching 17 passes across the past three seasons, and has one more year of eligibility. He hasn't been wasting his time, though; he was picked as one of 22 Allstate Good Works team members this past season, and his Delaware bio notes that he's a ridiculously good bowler.
QB Mike Rocco ** (Liberty Christian - VA)
Short version: Moderately successful but unable to win over coaches or fans.
I think we're all pretty familiar with the story. Through no fault of his own, Rocco was one of the most polarizing members of the team, thanks to his battle with Phillip Sims in 2012. Before that, he had played some mop-up time as a true freshman, then battled it out with David Watford in 2011 before winning the job and guiding UVA to the Peach Bowl. Rocco left upon feeling he wouldn't get a fair shake, which is almost certainly at least partly true, and transferred to Richmond to play for his uncle. NCAA rules forbade him from playing this year, so, having not yet redshirted, he'll have one season left this fall.
WR E.J. Scott *** (Good Counsel - MD)
Short version: Talented but overlooked.
Almost unfair to put him here, having only announced his transfer a few weeks ago. Scott had a mini-breakout in 2012 after missing 2011 with an injury, catching 29 passes for 390 yards, but for whatever reason couldn't get on the field in 2013 and had only three catches. If I were one to judge I'd call it poor judgment by the coaching staff, given how badly the rest of the receiving corps played. Scott will finish his football career at Wake Forest as a grad student. A little bit of a wasted talent here, the blame for which falls on the coaches.
QB Michael Strauss *** (Gulliver Prep - FL)
Short version: Biggest loser in QB shuffle found his spot at Richmond.
Strauss was London's first-ever recruit at UVA and early-enrolled in 2010. He never threw a pass in a game at UVA; he finished fourth in a four-way competition in 2011 and transferred to Richmond after the season. One imagines he might be a touch annoyed at having to compete with Rocco again, but he got himself a head start this past season. His stat line: 3,808 yards, 26 TDs, 8 INTs, 65.4% completion rate, and 318 yards per game. UVA's loss was definitely Richmond's gain here, and Strauss, like the others, has one final year of eligibility.
NEVER PANNED OUT (4)
S Pablo Alvarez *** (Belen Jesuit - FL)
Short version: Injury-riddled.
The extent of Alvarez's career at UVA was three defensive plays and a couple special teams appearances, all against Richmond in 2012. He spent too much time on the training table, with a season-ending shoulder injury in 2011 and a season-ending knee injury following those Richmond plays. With players on the bottom of the depth chart, sometimes there's less urgency to hurry him up in rehab, so what might be a six-week injury for a starter sometimes becomes season-ending for a fourth-stringer. This is not to doubt the extent of Alvarez's injuries, because we really have no idea. Regardless, Alvarez's career was snakebit, and his 2013 blurb on his bio says "spent the season as a student assistant." He quietly disappeared from the roster during the offseason, either by not being asked back for a fifth year or just deciding it wasn't worth the bother, or both.
WR Miles Gooch *** (Towers HS - GA)
Short version: Lightly-used wide receiver.
Gooch was one of the large passel of quarterbacks London brought in after his hiring, but only spent a brief time there before becoming a WR. He hasn't been totally invisible, and really has been easily the most well-known member of this category. His career totals as a receiver. though: 3 catches for 32 yards and a touchdown. He appeared in every game in 2013, and has some leftover potential to make a jump from this category in 2014 for his fifth season. But so far he's been mainly a blocking receiver and generally a replacement-level player.
S Kyrrel Latimer ** (DeMatha - MD)
Short version: Ghost.
Has never appeared in a game for UVA, and spent 2013 in some kind of weird limbo, possibly academics-related although that's nothing more than idle speculation on my part.
DE Stephen Lawe ** (Maury HS - VA)
Short version: Almost ghost.
Got into his first game action this past year as a redshirt junior, at the end of three blowouts. (One by us and two of us.) If London finds himself with less attrition than expected, he and Latimer would be prime candidates to be disinvited.
USEFUL (3)
RB Khalek Shepherd *** (Gwynn Park HS - MD)
Short version: Worked his way into a role as a change-of-pace tailback.
Shepherd's was a weird recruitment. His name literally did not come up for months, so I gave up and took him off the recruiting board, only for him to commit a couple weeks later. Al Groh's last ever. With one season left on his clock, Shepherd has become a decent change-of-pace back for UVA. He had 19 carries in 2012 and then really emerged in 2013 with 51 carries for 304 yards. It so happens that Shepherd holds the UVA single-season record for kick-return yardage, set in 2012.
I'd rather expect him to fit in a similar role this coming season as a senior. He won't unseat Kevin Parks and he'll face a major threat from Taquan Mizzell, but he was a consistent presence last year (best game: 10 carries for 81 yards against Maryland) and has carved himself a nice little role.
TE Zach Swanson *** (Katy - TX)
Short version: Should never have been a fullback, but is solid as a backup TE.
A pleasant late-cycle surprise, Swanson found himself jettisoned from Stanford, who gave him the ol' we-suggest-you-look-elsewhere routine in January. Forced to fend for himself, Swanson contacted several programs and ended up at UVA just a couple days before Signing Day.
An ill-conceived move to fullback set back his development, but he settled in at tight end, made some minimal contributions in 2012, and finally emerged this season as a quality backup, catching 19 passes for 173 yards.
S Rijo Walker *** (Bethel HS - VA)
Short version: Somewhat up-and-down occasional starter and career backup at safety.
One of the few members of this class not to redshirt, Walker spent basically his whole career as a backup safety with a sprinkling of starts here and there. An athletic interception as a sophomore against Indiana, early in the 2011 season, gave fans reason to believe in a bright future, and there was a general clamor for him to see more playing time. He played less in 2012 than in 2011, and moved into sort of a platoon in 2013 for a little while due to shaky play from Brandon Phelps; unfortunately, there were a few plays out of Walker that illustrated why he wasn't wresting the job away. Walker never really earned the full trust of the coaches, but he played well in stretches too.
CORE OF THE TEAM (2)
DT Chris Brathwaite *** (Holy Cross HS - NY)
Short version: Explosive DT who lost a year to academic ineligibility.
Based on results to date, I can't help but place him here (and considered putting him in the "useful" category), but Brathwaite has potential to be considered a star before his career is over. Originally recruited as a 250-pound linebacker (likely the Darryl Blackstock rush linebacker) he was quickly moved to DE in the 4-3 defense and then inside to DT. His 2012 season was a terrific one; even though he never started a game, he led the team in TFL with 10.5 and made everyone drool about what he might do the year after.
That turned out to be classwork on the road back to eligibility. Some players just decide to leave if the school decides they're not eligible to keep studying, and you can't really blame them, but Brathwaite took the Jameel Sewell path and worked his way back for his senior year. Having been rather excited about Brathwaite's potential ever since he signed on, I've been more than happy about his return. Given the off-year of no football, a repeat of his 2012 performance may be hard to achieve, but the chances of another explosive breakout year are just as high.
OT Conner Davis *** (Deep Run HS - VA)
Short version: Starter at left guard
Davis is no superstar, and probably not an NFL candidate when his eligibility is up after 2014. That said, two years going on three as a starter at left guard clearly makes him one of the top members of the class. He now has 20 starts under his belt and would have more if he hadn't missed a chunk of games in the middle of 2013 with an injury. Davis is no Branden Albert, but he's steady and often invisible, the latter of which is a perfectly good trait for an offensive guard. If I had a complaint it'd be that UVA needs much more strength and push out of the interior line than it gets, but Davis is good in pass protection and very technically sound.
STARS (3)
LB Henry Coley *** (Bayside HS - VA)
Short version: Starting linebacker and team tackle leader
Coley's progression through the ranks has been remarkable. His first start was as a redshirt freshman, in the Peach Bowl, an indication of the high opinion the coaching staff has had of him, even when he played only five games that year. Ever since then he's been a starter, only missing time with injury, and progressed from a respectable, solid player in 2012 as a sophomore to the team's tackle leader in 2013. He and Daquan Romero were nothing short of rocks this past season, and their playmaking kept UVA in a lot of games. Coley is one of the football-smartest players on the team, and it shows.
TE Jake McGee ** (Collegiate School - VA)
Like Gooch, McGee was recruited as a quarterback, but quickly found a new position. He redshirted 2010 and had a thoroughly uneventful 2011, mainly as a special-teamer, until breaking onto the scene early in 2012. He did so by simultaneously drawing a pass-interference penalty and making a leaping, one-handed, 40-yard-bomb reception that rescued a floundering attempt at a game-winning drive against Penn State, a game which UVA eventually won. Another athletic game-winning grab against Miami pretty much cemented his rep.
Leading UVA in receiving wasn't really a hard task in 2013, but someone had to do it, and McGee did, with 43 catches and 395 yards. What little semblance of a passing game UVA had depended extremely heavily on McGee's athleticism. His blocking is a little suspect, so he's really more of a big, hand-on-the-ground receiver, but clearly indispensible all the same.
RB Kevin Parks *** (West Rowan HS - NC)
Short version: First 1,000-yard rusher since 2004.
I don't need to say much more than that, but I will. Parks ran for insane amounts of yardage in high school, routinely piling up 200 and 300 yard games and ultimately setting a national record in that regard. For his career he was just shy of 11,000 yards. Utterly amazing. So it should come as no surprise that Parks broke a futility streak at the running back position for UVA by piling up yards in college, too. Parks was a true workhorse, carrying 227 times and catching 38 passes, too, and the ACC media noticed and made him the second-team back. He's already put himself on a pedestal among UVA backs like Wali Lundy and Alvin Pearman and another 1,000-yard season ought to move him even higher in the estimation of the critics.
****************************************************
If you were counting, there were five players in the "core" and "stars" category, which makes the 2010 class a low performer. Last year, we found that 2009 produced ten such players, and four "useful" ones instead of three. And that was with some high-profile busts like Quintin Hunter and Dominique Wallace. None of this should be surprising considering the coaching change.
What I found interesting was the lack of any complete fadeaways, disciplinary problems, and dismissals. Nobody got kicked off the team except Brathwaite, and he's been working hard to make up for it. You might say "that's because London was now recruiting these guys" but London is responsible for only about half the class. Even the players who left, or decommitted, ended up as pretty high-character guys and didn't find themselves in handcuffs at any time, unlike various examples from 2009.
However. The general lightness on useful-or-better players is part of the reason for UVA's current swoon. It's not one bit of an excuse, because lots of programs go through coaching changes and don't go 2-10 four years later, but it's still a reason. It makes one hope that if 2015 is another coaching-change class, it won't be as light on both quantity and quality of its players.
Thursday, February 6, 2014
signstravaganza 2014
Signing Day! I admit, to me it's a little disappointing these days, and here's why: Seems to me that a few years ago, you could follow along most of the day - or at least through lunch and the early afternoon - as the recruiting services reported on incoming faxes. I liked refreshing every 10-15 minutes or so. It was a nice work distraction - nice enough that it seemed like it really ought to be a national holiday. Now all the faxes are in by 9 AM, except the ones from the West Coast. I don't know if all this is true, but this is how it seems to me.
Let's get started by closing out the recruiting board. The three names in yellow all went elsewhere: Derrick Nnadi to FSU, Vincent Jackson to South Florida, and Ladarius Wiley to Vanderbilt. None of these are surprises. If I thought we were a serious threat to land any of them they'd have been in a color higher than yellow.
The proprieties dispensed with, let's talk roster management. This is a class of 17 players when all's said and done. 18 are on the final version of the recruiting board, but Zack Jones doesn't look to have made it. We've lost three to attrition so far - E.J. Scott, Adrian Gamble, and Pablo Alvarez. 89 is now the final scholarship count, meaning at least four more eventual departures. (Quite likely more, since we were actively recruiting three or four more players at the end, and missed on all of them.) London made a curious comment at his press conference, mentioning 17 graduating seniors after the 2014 season. Curious because I count 20 scholarship rising seniors.
Clearly, London knows something we don't. A shocking development. I will, in the near future - this very post even - harshly criticize London's roster management as it relates to the various positions. One thing London does very well, however, is manage the overall number. It's a function of his being highly on top of his players' classroom exploits, or, occasionally (and much more occasionally under London than Groh) their lack thereof. In general, his recruiting classes hit the target as well as you could expect.
There are features in this post that don't change every year, so let's get to them. First, the positional analysis.
QUARTERBACK - Corwin Cutler
Cutler took a prep season at Fork Union, putting him back in the 2014 class after originally signing in 2013. Knowing that they'd have him coming in this season, the coaches chose not to pursue any quarterbacks in this class; they made a few token offers and didn't work any of them especially hard. That's fine. We'll have five, which is a good number. You don't really need six.
RUNNING BACK - Jordan Ellis
There was also no need to overpursue at this position, and Ellis is by himself in this class. That works for me. Ellis adds a nice size element to the current stable of backs, which is mostly missing right now. I like Ellis's chances to be a poor man's Kevin Parks, of sorts. Maybe not even that poor. He could be the thunder to someone's lightning - say, if Taquan Mizzell is a four-year player.
WIDE RECEIVER - Donovan Dowling, Jamil Kamara
A third straight properly-staffed position, I think. We'll go in with 10 as of now. Dowling, as profiled Monday, looks to me likely to fill a possession receiver niche, and should redshirt; Kamara, as more of a feature-potential guy, may not, and probably shouldn't, given our inability last season to find a consistent solution at this position.
TIGHT END - Evan Butts
UVA hasn't recruited a dedicated tight end since Zach Swanson, so Butts is a welcome addition. I'd like to see him redshirt - I mean, that should be the default setting, really - but Rob Burns and Mario Nixon seem like such odd ducks at the position that it might be Butts's fate to play, if he arrives with enough size.
OFFENSIVE LINE - Steven Moss, Jacob Fieler
OK, so far I've been complimentary of the roster management. That stops here. (recordscratch.mp3)
This is stupid. Jacob Fieler's been told to prepare to be in the two-deep when he starts spring practice. That's not because he's a superstar. That's because we almost literally have no choice. With George Adeosun probably still out, there are 11 scholarship O-linemen besides Fieler in spring camp. That means just one injury we don't know about, or one guy who isn't panning out, and Fieler's there by default. (Yes, I know Jackson Matteo exists, but filling out your two-deep with walk-ons is only further proof that you're fucking this up.)
Let me repeat: A true freshman is in the two-deep because we have no other choice. The only other option is that the coaches like Fieler more than one or two guys they already have, which is equally ridiculous - you're telling me that a guy who's never been to a single one of your practices is better than the guys you've been developing? This is understandable in the case of a five-star player. Fieler had better be a five-star player disguised as a guy nobody ever heard of.
In the fall, there'll be 14 players on scholarship, assuming no attrition, injuries, and such - which is a stupid thing to assume. We can't even go three deep at offensive line. And the coaches saw fit to sign two linemen.** Do you know how many linemen you'd have if you did that every year? Ten - if you redshirted everyone, which is the opposite of what we do.
This is astoundingly shitty. Fieler and Moss are good-looking players with potential. But this is about quantity, not quality. We have quality, which doesn't excuse the lack of quantity. The fact remains that London looked at what can only be considered a ridiculously thin lineup and was content to let it get thinner. Impossible to put it any other way: when it comes to the offensive line, which is the foundation of your offense, London is utterly fucking up the program.
**Will Richardson's decommitment is not a defense.
DEFENSIVE TACKLE - Andrew Brown
The program-screwing doesn't stop on the offensive side. OK, getting Chris Brathwaite back helps the situation. It's a good thing, because otherwise we'd be going into this season with five DTs - again, unable to go three deep. Now we can, if just barely.
On the plus side, Andrew Brown is something else. The #1 DT in the country to most services, Brown is the kind of recruit that is usually out of UVA's reach. Fast, powerful, whatever your ideal adjective combination, Brown is it. He'll play from day 1, of course. He might play a little DE. He's got a head start on college as an early enrollee and is likely to quickly blow past most of the depth chart. And hopefully will blow past opposing OGs just as quickly.
DEFENSIVE END - Michael Biesemier, Darrious Carter, Cory Jones
From a numbers perspective, I can calm down a bit when it comes to defensive end, as we'll carry nine into the season. Maybe eight or even seven as I'd keep an eye on the positional status of Jack English and the offer status of Stephen Lawe - as in, whether Lawe gets invited back for a fifth year. It may not happen.
Seven would be thin, but not crushingly so, at least. The problem is that this class is full of fliers. You're not looking at very much here - they're all two-stars on two of the four services and none were in high demand. London flipped all three of these guys very late in the process from commitments to other programs - JMU, Temple, and Toledo, respectively. It probably speaks to another instance of positional neglect - surely you ought to have a defensive end committed before December when the ones in your program now are so unproven.
The main attraction for these guys so far is body type, which is different than, say, Andrew Brown, who interests people when he actually moves. Jones is the exception, but he could not be rawer, having picked up football literally last year. Individually I'd have no problem with any of these pickups, if we had some proven in-demand talent to add as well. Absolutely, take a flier here and there on someone you think might be a high-reward type. When that's what your whole class at the position is comprised of, it's a problem.
LINEBACKER - Caanan Brown, J.J. Jackson, Chris Peace
To a large extent, that story continues here, although in Jackson's case, the lack of demand is heavily affected by his early commitment. Rather than go after proven commodities, the staff chose to sign mold-fitting athletes, all of whom bring to mind Max Valles. Valles's listing as a "linebacker" is slightly laughable, as, by playing him, the staff chose to sacrifice a great deal of traditional linebacker attributes in exchange for a third defensive end on the field.
So on the one hand, perhaps I'm overblowing the concerns about defensive end depth. Peace and Jackson in particular could grow into actual, real defensive ends. On the other hand, the staff offered exactly three players considered by Rivals to be middle linebackers. Essentially what they've done is take London's philosophy of scooping up lots of athletes without positions, who might be cornerbacks, safeties, receivers, even tight ends or defensive ends depending on their size, and extended that strategy to linebacker as well. These guys, if linebacker is the right word, will need a lot of coaching up, although you have to wonder if Jon Tenuta will get time to see his vision come to fruition.
DEFENSIVE BACK - Jeffery Farrar, Darious Latimore, Quin Blanding
Blanding, like Andrew Brown, is a talent and a half. With Brandon Phelps's hold on the free safety job being rather tenuous, and a lot of safeties on the roster that we're just never going to use, Blanding steps in with a clear path to the two-deep and a shot at starting by season's end. He won't get the head start of spring enrollment, but he's got all the tools all the same. I harp on the oversigning of defensive backs, but Blanding is exempt.
In a way, though, watching a lot of recruiting targets go elsewhere - like Daiquan Lawrence and Ladarius Wiley - saved London from himself. At cornerback, we can now go five deep. 10 cornerbacks for two positions, not including the need for a nickel back. We can't go three deep at O-line, but London wanted to go damn near six deep at corner? Farrar and Latimore look like good players in a vacuum, but given the numbers on the roster we probably could have survived without taking even one cornerback this year. That London wanted three or four (and was content with two offensive linemen) is stunningly awful judgment.
KICKER/PUNTER - none
But not for lack of trying. UVA briefly held the commitment of Gary Wunderlich until Ole Miss flipped him, and just this week offered the other UA all-star, Adam Centers, who chose Wake Forest instead.
****************************************************
Like Festivus, Signstravaganza has its made-up traditions, and these are lists. To wit:
Top five stories of the year:
1. Jamil Kamara's recruitment. Kamara strung it out until December, though at least one poster on TheSabre claims he's been all UVA since the summer and just enjoyed leaving everyone in suspense. Nevertheless, it tied a bow on a saga that's lasted years, since Kamara has been on the radar since his freshman year.
2. Jordan Ellis's productivity. Ellis put to rest a lot of doubt by coming out of the gates like gangbusters and piling up both yards and touchdowns. He broke a school record for touchdowns in a game and let the record stand a whole week before breaking it again.
3. The Derrick Nnadi saga. Nnadi needed all season to make up his mind and was back and forth seemingly every day. I started him in green on the recruiting board, moved him up to blue, back down to green, down to yellow, down to red, and then back up to yellow. He didn't respond well to being pushed in any one direction, or pulled for that matter, and since recruiting is all about pushing and pulling, it wasn't a terribly predictable path that he followed.
4. The Thoroughbreds. Why is UVA getting five-star recruits during two-win seasons? VT fans will tell you it's because their coaches are "steering" them. What they mean by that is that it's totally unfair that someone whose job it is to give guidance and coaching to a high schooler should offer any guidance or coaching, if said guidance doesn't move them in the right direction. The definition of "steering" is "suggesting the wrong school." The truth is that the VT coaching staff has managed to piss off a lot of the wrong people in Tidewater and UVA is reaping the benefits of that plus their desire to keep playing together after leaving high school.
5. Offensive line, or lack thereof. At least, I think it's a story.
Five most likely to play as true freshmen:
1. Andrew Brown
2. Quin Blanding
3. Jamil Kamara
4. Jacob Fieler
5. Steven Moss
I mean, the first three are no-brainers. They're playing. We'd be crazy not to, particularly, I think, in the cases of Brown and Kamara. The other two are offensive linemen and therefore the beneficiaries of the lack of a depth chart. Another name that might slide in here: Corwin Cutler, whose chance to win the quarterback job is legitimate.
Five I'm most excited about:
1. Andrew Brown
2. Jamil Kamara
3. Quin Blanding
4. Jordan Ellis
5. Corwin Cutler
For Kamara and Cutler, it's because they represent a chance to fix huge problem spots. Ellis is there because I'm absurdly biased toward running backs, my favorite position on the field, and his productivity should excite. And, I mean, you can't not have the five-stars, right? Brown especially - if he's all he's cracked up to be, I gotta tell you there's very little more exciting to me on defense than a terrorizing defensive tackle roaring up the middle to assault a hapless quarterback.
Three sleepers:
1. Cory Jones
2. Donovan Dowling
3. Chris Peace
Inclusion on this list requires that you have a two-star rating from at least one service and that I like some aspect of your game. Usually two-star players have ill-defined roles - Dowling, at least from my own perspective, is not likely to make any all-anything teams, but does have a strong likelihood of being able to fill a particular niche and do it very well. Jones and Peace are just the opposite - they're high-ceiling fliers with athletic ability in need of harnessing.
Five highest-rated:
1 (tie). Andrew Brown (5 stars)
1 (tie). Quin Blanding (5 stars)
3 (tie). Jamil Kamara (4 stars)
3 (tie). Steven Moss (4 stars)
5 (tie). Corwin Cutler (3.25 stars)
5 (tie). Jeffery Farrar (3.25 stars)
Simple star averages.
Eat it, Shaney:
Jamil Kamara
Quin Blanding
Steven Moss
Andrew Brown
Eat it, Randy:
Quin Blanding
Steven Moss
Andrew Brown
Eat it, Larry:
Jamil Kamara
Quin Blanding
Steven Moss
Andrew Brown
Players offered by VT, Maryland, and UNC, respectively, that we won out on. What a surprise that they're all the same players. The number of losses to each of these schools numbers slightly more in each case, but without as much star power.
The ones that got away:
LB Connor Strachan (Boston College)
OL Brock Ruble (Florida State)
K Gary Wunderlich (Mississippi)
OL Bentley Spain (North Carolina)
OL Will Richardson (NC State)
OL Sam Mustipher (Notre Dame)
LB Troy Reeder (Penn State)
OL Alex Bookser (Pittsburgh)
WR Cameron Phillips (Virginia Tech)
LB Melvin Keihn (Virginia Tech)
My my, look at all the OLs. This is the list of players whose going elsewhere hurts the most. What's worse is all the players from pipeline schools. Ruble and Phillips are from DeMatha. Mustipher, Good Counsel. Keihn, Gilman. UVA's name is big in these places and London could not or would not get anywhere with them. Bookser is both mystifying and infuriating - he had UVA in a top four for a long time, and eventually committed to Pitt in December. He's from Pittsburgh, so a Pitt commitment isn't at all surprising - but the fact that he waited that long suggests he was more than open to leaving the state. Why, then, despite the interest and the need for O-linemen, did we hear nothing about him after July? There's no good reason I can think of.
In all, UVA did very poorly this year in the "DMV" area, and Baltimore too. Very, very poorly.
Finally, presented here is the original board, saved from some 54 weeks ago:
Showing what an imprecise science this can be, last year when I showed off the original board, it had eventual commitments in all different colors. This year we went 4-for-4 in blue and 0-for-everything else - including orange.
There's no offseason in recruiting, so the 2015 board will hopefully be up soon. I sure hope the guy in charge of that gets his act together. That class is likely to be an uphill battle along the lines of 2010.
Let's get started by closing out the recruiting board. The three names in yellow all went elsewhere: Derrick Nnadi to FSU, Vincent Jackson to South Florida, and Ladarius Wiley to Vanderbilt. None of these are surprises. If I thought we were a serious threat to land any of them they'd have been in a color higher than yellow.
The proprieties dispensed with, let's talk roster management. This is a class of 17 players when all's said and done. 18 are on the final version of the recruiting board, but Zack Jones doesn't look to have made it. We've lost three to attrition so far - E.J. Scott, Adrian Gamble, and Pablo Alvarez. 89 is now the final scholarship count, meaning at least four more eventual departures. (Quite likely more, since we were actively recruiting three or four more players at the end, and missed on all of them.) London made a curious comment at his press conference, mentioning 17 graduating seniors after the 2014 season. Curious because I count 20 scholarship rising seniors.
Clearly, London knows something we don't. A shocking development. I will, in the near future - this very post even - harshly criticize London's roster management as it relates to the various positions. One thing London does very well, however, is manage the overall number. It's a function of his being highly on top of his players' classroom exploits, or, occasionally (and much more occasionally under London than Groh) their lack thereof. In general, his recruiting classes hit the target as well as you could expect.
There are features in this post that don't change every year, so let's get to them. First, the positional analysis.
QUARTERBACK - Corwin Cutler
Cutler took a prep season at Fork Union, putting him back in the 2014 class after originally signing in 2013. Knowing that they'd have him coming in this season, the coaches chose not to pursue any quarterbacks in this class; they made a few token offers and didn't work any of them especially hard. That's fine. We'll have five, which is a good number. You don't really need six.
RUNNING BACK - Jordan Ellis
There was also no need to overpursue at this position, and Ellis is by himself in this class. That works for me. Ellis adds a nice size element to the current stable of backs, which is mostly missing right now. I like Ellis's chances to be a poor man's Kevin Parks, of sorts. Maybe not even that poor. He could be the thunder to someone's lightning - say, if Taquan Mizzell is a four-year player.
WIDE RECEIVER - Donovan Dowling, Jamil Kamara
A third straight properly-staffed position, I think. We'll go in with 10 as of now. Dowling, as profiled Monday, looks to me likely to fill a possession receiver niche, and should redshirt; Kamara, as more of a feature-potential guy, may not, and probably shouldn't, given our inability last season to find a consistent solution at this position.
TIGHT END - Evan Butts
UVA hasn't recruited a dedicated tight end since Zach Swanson, so Butts is a welcome addition. I'd like to see him redshirt - I mean, that should be the default setting, really - but Rob Burns and Mario Nixon seem like such odd ducks at the position that it might be Butts's fate to play, if he arrives with enough size.
OFFENSIVE LINE - Steven Moss, Jacob Fieler
OK, so far I've been complimentary of the roster management. That stops here. (recordscratch.mp3)
This is stupid. Jacob Fieler's been told to prepare to be in the two-deep when he starts spring practice. That's not because he's a superstar. That's because we almost literally have no choice. With George Adeosun probably still out, there are 11 scholarship O-linemen besides Fieler in spring camp. That means just one injury we don't know about, or one guy who isn't panning out, and Fieler's there by default. (Yes, I know Jackson Matteo exists, but filling out your two-deep with walk-ons is only further proof that you're fucking this up.)
Let me repeat: A true freshman is in the two-deep because we have no other choice. The only other option is that the coaches like Fieler more than one or two guys they already have, which is equally ridiculous - you're telling me that a guy who's never been to a single one of your practices is better than the guys you've been developing? This is understandable in the case of a five-star player. Fieler had better be a five-star player disguised as a guy nobody ever heard of.
In the fall, there'll be 14 players on scholarship, assuming no attrition, injuries, and such - which is a stupid thing to assume. We can't even go three deep at offensive line. And the coaches saw fit to sign two linemen.** Do you know how many linemen you'd have if you did that every year? Ten - if you redshirted everyone, which is the opposite of what we do.
This is astoundingly shitty. Fieler and Moss are good-looking players with potential. But this is about quantity, not quality. We have quality, which doesn't excuse the lack of quantity. The fact remains that London looked at what can only be considered a ridiculously thin lineup and was content to let it get thinner. Impossible to put it any other way: when it comes to the offensive line, which is the foundation of your offense, London is utterly fucking up the program.
**Will Richardson's decommitment is not a defense.
DEFENSIVE TACKLE - Andrew Brown
The program-screwing doesn't stop on the offensive side. OK, getting Chris Brathwaite back helps the situation. It's a good thing, because otherwise we'd be going into this season with five DTs - again, unable to go three deep. Now we can, if just barely.
On the plus side, Andrew Brown is something else. The #1 DT in the country to most services, Brown is the kind of recruit that is usually out of UVA's reach. Fast, powerful, whatever your ideal adjective combination, Brown is it. He'll play from day 1, of course. He might play a little DE. He's got a head start on college as an early enrollee and is likely to quickly blow past most of the depth chart. And hopefully will blow past opposing OGs just as quickly.
DEFENSIVE END - Michael Biesemier, Darrious Carter, Cory Jones
From a numbers perspective, I can calm down a bit when it comes to defensive end, as we'll carry nine into the season. Maybe eight or even seven as I'd keep an eye on the positional status of Jack English and the offer status of Stephen Lawe - as in, whether Lawe gets invited back for a fifth year. It may not happen.
Seven would be thin, but not crushingly so, at least. The problem is that this class is full of fliers. You're not looking at very much here - they're all two-stars on two of the four services and none were in high demand. London flipped all three of these guys very late in the process from commitments to other programs - JMU, Temple, and Toledo, respectively. It probably speaks to another instance of positional neglect - surely you ought to have a defensive end committed before December when the ones in your program now are so unproven.
The main attraction for these guys so far is body type, which is different than, say, Andrew Brown, who interests people when he actually moves. Jones is the exception, but he could not be rawer, having picked up football literally last year. Individually I'd have no problem with any of these pickups, if we had some proven in-demand talent to add as well. Absolutely, take a flier here and there on someone you think might be a high-reward type. When that's what your whole class at the position is comprised of, it's a problem.
LINEBACKER - Caanan Brown, J.J. Jackson, Chris Peace
To a large extent, that story continues here, although in Jackson's case, the lack of demand is heavily affected by his early commitment. Rather than go after proven commodities, the staff chose to sign mold-fitting athletes, all of whom bring to mind Max Valles. Valles's listing as a "linebacker" is slightly laughable, as, by playing him, the staff chose to sacrifice a great deal of traditional linebacker attributes in exchange for a third defensive end on the field.
So on the one hand, perhaps I'm overblowing the concerns about defensive end depth. Peace and Jackson in particular could grow into actual, real defensive ends. On the other hand, the staff offered exactly three players considered by Rivals to be middle linebackers. Essentially what they've done is take London's philosophy of scooping up lots of athletes without positions, who might be cornerbacks, safeties, receivers, even tight ends or defensive ends depending on their size, and extended that strategy to linebacker as well. These guys, if linebacker is the right word, will need a lot of coaching up, although you have to wonder if Jon Tenuta will get time to see his vision come to fruition.
DEFENSIVE BACK - Jeffery Farrar, Darious Latimore, Quin Blanding
Blanding, like Andrew Brown, is a talent and a half. With Brandon Phelps's hold on the free safety job being rather tenuous, and a lot of safeties on the roster that we're just never going to use, Blanding steps in with a clear path to the two-deep and a shot at starting by season's end. He won't get the head start of spring enrollment, but he's got all the tools all the same. I harp on the oversigning of defensive backs, but Blanding is exempt.
In a way, though, watching a lot of recruiting targets go elsewhere - like Daiquan Lawrence and Ladarius Wiley - saved London from himself. At cornerback, we can now go five deep. 10 cornerbacks for two positions, not including the need for a nickel back. We can't go three deep at O-line, but London wanted to go damn near six deep at corner? Farrar and Latimore look like good players in a vacuum, but given the numbers on the roster we probably could have survived without taking even one cornerback this year. That London wanted three or four (and was content with two offensive linemen) is stunningly awful judgment.
KICKER/PUNTER - none
But not for lack of trying. UVA briefly held the commitment of Gary Wunderlich until Ole Miss flipped him, and just this week offered the other UA all-star, Adam Centers, who chose Wake Forest instead.
****************************************************
Like Festivus, Signstravaganza has its made-up traditions, and these are lists. To wit:
Top five stories of the year:
1. Jamil Kamara's recruitment. Kamara strung it out until December, though at least one poster on TheSabre claims he's been all UVA since the summer and just enjoyed leaving everyone in suspense. Nevertheless, it tied a bow on a saga that's lasted years, since Kamara has been on the radar since his freshman year.
2. Jordan Ellis's productivity. Ellis put to rest a lot of doubt by coming out of the gates like gangbusters and piling up both yards and touchdowns. He broke a school record for touchdowns in a game and let the record stand a whole week before breaking it again.
3. The Derrick Nnadi saga. Nnadi needed all season to make up his mind and was back and forth seemingly every day. I started him in green on the recruiting board, moved him up to blue, back down to green, down to yellow, down to red, and then back up to yellow. He didn't respond well to being pushed in any one direction, or pulled for that matter, and since recruiting is all about pushing and pulling, it wasn't a terribly predictable path that he followed.
4. The Thoroughbreds. Why is UVA getting five-star recruits during two-win seasons? VT fans will tell you it's because their coaches are "steering" them. What they mean by that is that it's totally unfair that someone whose job it is to give guidance and coaching to a high schooler should offer any guidance or coaching, if said guidance doesn't move them in the right direction. The definition of "steering" is "suggesting the wrong school." The truth is that the VT coaching staff has managed to piss off a lot of the wrong people in Tidewater and UVA is reaping the benefits of that plus their desire to keep playing together after leaving high school.
5. Offensive line, or lack thereof. At least, I think it's a story.
Five most likely to play as true freshmen:
1. Andrew Brown
2. Quin Blanding
3. Jamil Kamara
4. Jacob Fieler
5. Steven Moss
I mean, the first three are no-brainers. They're playing. We'd be crazy not to, particularly, I think, in the cases of Brown and Kamara. The other two are offensive linemen and therefore the beneficiaries of the lack of a depth chart. Another name that might slide in here: Corwin Cutler, whose chance to win the quarterback job is legitimate.
Five I'm most excited about:
1. Andrew Brown
2. Jamil Kamara
3. Quin Blanding
4. Jordan Ellis
5. Corwin Cutler
For Kamara and Cutler, it's because they represent a chance to fix huge problem spots. Ellis is there because I'm absurdly biased toward running backs, my favorite position on the field, and his productivity should excite. And, I mean, you can't not have the five-stars, right? Brown especially - if he's all he's cracked up to be, I gotta tell you there's very little more exciting to me on defense than a terrorizing defensive tackle roaring up the middle to assault a hapless quarterback.
Three sleepers:
1. Cory Jones
2. Donovan Dowling
3. Chris Peace
Inclusion on this list requires that you have a two-star rating from at least one service and that I like some aspect of your game. Usually two-star players have ill-defined roles - Dowling, at least from my own perspective, is not likely to make any all-anything teams, but does have a strong likelihood of being able to fill a particular niche and do it very well. Jones and Peace are just the opposite - they're high-ceiling fliers with athletic ability in need of harnessing.
Five highest-rated:
1 (tie). Andrew Brown (5 stars)
1 (tie). Quin Blanding (5 stars)
3 (tie). Jamil Kamara (4 stars)
3 (tie). Steven Moss (4 stars)
5 (tie). Corwin Cutler (3.25 stars)
5 (tie). Jeffery Farrar (3.25 stars)
Simple star averages.
Eat it, Shaney:
Jamil Kamara
Quin Blanding
Steven Moss
Andrew Brown
Eat it, Randy:
Quin Blanding
Steven Moss
Andrew Brown
Eat it, Larry:
Jamil Kamara
Quin Blanding
Steven Moss
Andrew Brown
Players offered by VT, Maryland, and UNC, respectively, that we won out on. What a surprise that they're all the same players. The number of losses to each of these schools numbers slightly more in each case, but without as much star power.
The ones that got away:
LB Connor Strachan (Boston College)
OL Brock Ruble (Florida State)
K Gary Wunderlich (Mississippi)
OL Bentley Spain (North Carolina)
OL Will Richardson (NC State)
OL Sam Mustipher (Notre Dame)
LB Troy Reeder (Penn State)
OL Alex Bookser (Pittsburgh)
WR Cameron Phillips (Virginia Tech)
LB Melvin Keihn (Virginia Tech)
My my, look at all the OLs. This is the list of players whose going elsewhere hurts the most. What's worse is all the players from pipeline schools. Ruble and Phillips are from DeMatha. Mustipher, Good Counsel. Keihn, Gilman. UVA's name is big in these places and London could not or would not get anywhere with them. Bookser is both mystifying and infuriating - he had UVA in a top four for a long time, and eventually committed to Pitt in December. He's from Pittsburgh, so a Pitt commitment isn't at all surprising - but the fact that he waited that long suggests he was more than open to leaving the state. Why, then, despite the interest and the need for O-linemen, did we hear nothing about him after July? There's no good reason I can think of.
In all, UVA did very poorly this year in the "DMV" area, and Baltimore too. Very, very poorly.
Finally, presented here is the original board, saved from some 54 weeks ago:
Showing what an imprecise science this can be, last year when I showed off the original board, it had eventual commitments in all different colors. This year we went 4-for-4 in blue and 0-for-everything else - including orange.
There's no offseason in recruiting, so the 2015 board will hopefully be up soon. I sure hope the guy in charge of that gets his act together. That class is likely to be an uphill battle along the lines of 2010.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
lacrosse season preview
There's a jillion reasons why lacrosse has gotten here all sneaky-like. Basketball is a much better distraction than usual. The season is a week earlier than usual. It's snowing. Whatever. Thursday is the first game of the season. It better be a better one than last year, because if you're going to hang your hat on a sport like UVA does with lacrosse, a 7-8 season is miserable.
Fortunately, it's fair to say that so much went against UVA last season that the Hoos should improve just based on a rebound to the mean, in terms of luck. Two key players got hurt, and UVA lost a number of close games that, given the swing of a goal here and a goal there, would've turned a miserable season into at least a decent one.
This year, it'll be a set of mostly unfamiliar faces, with us sitting with bated breath (not "baited" breath) to see if one of them becomes the next Steele Stanwick or Matt Ward. As is traditional, position by position:
ATTACK
It's not as if there were no bright spots last season, and one of them returns for his senior year. If you want a breakout star, Mark Cockerton is a good choice, scoring 49 goals last season after netting 29 across his first two. Cockerton by himself took almost a quarter of UVA's shots. He's a pure finisher, with only 16 assists in three seasons.
That's where some new blood will have to come in. Without Nick O'Reilly or Matt White anymore to pass the ball, it'll be up to some unfamiliar names. Owen Van Arsdale is a decent passer, but his small stature and not-great shooting make it hard to keep him on the first attack unit if you can find better options. That's where James Pannell comes in.
The younger brother of Cornell's Rob Pannell, maybe the biggest name in college lacrosse the past couple years, Pannell was limited by an ankle injury all last season. Dom Starsia thinks he can be the next big name at Virginia, and he'll get every chance to do so. He's got the kind of playmaking skills UVA will need, and he and Cockerton are written in pen to start the season.
After that, you'll probably see Van Arsdale get his chances as the third guy, but three freshmen will also get their shot to impress. Ryan Lukakovic, A.J. Fish, and Joe French all got long looks in the scrimmage against Navy. French is a post-grad recruit and so has a little extra experience on the other two; Fish is huge for an attackman at 6'3"; Lukakovic comes in with the best recruiting credentials and has a little bit of a lead on the field. (Starsia came right out and told Jeff White he doesn't see Fish on the first line right now, but basically also said "don't forget about this guy either.") Expect the third attackman to rotate a little bit early on, until Starsia gets comfy with one of them; the three that don't make it will simply comprise the second line.
Pannell got a little burn last year, but mainly on a bum ankle, so he's almost as much a new name as these freshmen. It should be fun to watch this group come together, and if Pannell is the player he's hyped to be, it almost won't matter who the third attackman is. He and Cockerton have dynamic potential playing together. As long as a playmaker or two emerges, scoring should be up from last year.
OFFENSIVE MIDFIELD
Urgh....I hate trying to predict midfield lines because I'm always wrong. And we didn't get a lot of production out of them last year (in saying this, I'm just going to pretend Matt White was at attack where everyone wanted him.)
OK, fine, I can't do that. White was a midfielder, no matter how badly we wanted it to be otherwise, and he was a good player no matter where he was put. Replacing him will be tough. Rob Emery is the guy you think of first, and he's solid, but sat the scrimmage with an injury. He and Ryan Tucker are as close to a lock as you can get as a starting line of midfielders; Tucker shoots cannonballs and an increase from his 15-goal output would be highly welcome.
Again, the third guy remains a bit of a mystery at this point. Sophomore Greg Coholan got a couple starts last year, including the last game against Bellarmine, and played most of the season on the second unit; he's got a shot. The guy that would really get everyone perked up with interest, though, is freshman Zed Williams, a highly anticipated and talked-about recruit for some time now.
The second line will probably start with whichever of Coholan or Williams doesn't play on the first unit. Steady senior Pat Harbeson has some wheels and is likely to see time here. One certainly also imagines that the highly versatile and athletic Chris LaPierre will also at times be run out on the offense.
A nominal lineup to start the season might be Emery-Tucker-Coholan and Williams-Harbeson-someone; that someone might be Shocker but is just as likely to come from basically nowhere, if not more so since LaPierre is primarily a defender. At a minimum, Emery and Tucker should be counted on to provide some dangerous secondary scoring; the two should at least combine for 40 goals. Williams has a chance to be an X-factor. This is kind of a thin unit, and despite the skills of Emery and Tucker, possibly a little bit dependent on Williams for a shot of excitement.
SSDM
UVA is respectably deep here, with LaPierre returning from a lost season in which the Hoos were forced to develop his replacement early. Blake Riley and Bobby Hill both come back as seniors, joining LaPierre on the defense. Harbeson has been used at defense as well, though there's a clear gap between his skills and those of the others.
Look also for Carlson Milikin to get a shot - Milikin got a look from various schools, UVA included, as a football recruit, a pretty clear indication of the athleticism he could potentially bring. Milikin ought to get on the field if for no other reason than to get experience for the future, since every name I mentioned above is a senior.
That experience should turn out pretty good for UVA this season, though. At a minimum, LaPierre, Riley, and Hill are all high-quality players, and there exists some opportunity to get transition chances with this bunch too. LaPierre obviously - the Human Clear himself - is at his best on a dead sprint, but Hill is sneaky dangerous in transition too, and Harbeson's speed is useful as well. This might be quietly the strongest unit on the team.
LSM
Tanner Ottenbreit looks certain to monopolize the time here, the other three LSMs on the roster being the little-used Frank Price and two redshirt freshmen. I looked through my old posts for anything I'd ever written about Ottenbreit, who was also last year's starting LSM, and there was nothing except for a few sparse mentions about him taking the occasional faceoff. I think that means we'll be fine, but neither is Ottenbreit likely to light up the announcers and pundits a la Maryland's Jesse Bernhardt last year.
DEFENSE
There's a lot to like here. UVA gets Scott McWilliams back for his senior season; McWilliams blossomed last year and turned into a turnover machine. In a good way. McWilliams was fourth in the country in C/T per game last year. Add the ACC's Rookie of the Year in Tanner Scales, and you have the makings of a pretty solid close-in defense.
The third guy, unlike on offense, is no mystery either; it's Greg Danseglio, who's got versatility enough to also pop in at LSM, which he did at times last year. It sounds like a mathematical impossibility, but four defenders each started a majority of the games last season, and UVA only loses Harry Prevas out of that group.
For a possibility as a fourth player who could earn some time, look for transfer fifth-year Joseph Lisicky to chip in and help. Lisicky was a D-III All-American at Lynchburg College and an MLL draft pick in 2013, and there ought to be room for him on the field as well.
This ought to be a strong unit, maybe even stronger than last year even without Prevas. Nothing against Prevas, who was a solid player, but I'll still take a combined 30 starts with an extra year of experience and some accolades under their belt to boot. Scales forced his way into the lineup midseason and opened a lot of eyes, and McWilliams is a playmaker. I like the direction this unit is headed.
GOALIE
There's not much to say here except that UVA absolutely must get better goalie play than last year; neither Dan Marino nor Rhody Heller could manage even a .500 save percentage. Marino started the season and ended up benched, finishing at .455; Heller wasn't a lot better at .482. Getting just a pedestrian .510 out of those two (our opponents combined for .533) would've saved 11 goals, close to one per game - which in turn might well have put us in the tournament.
It's for that reason that freshman Matt Barrett - the #1 incoming freshman goalie in the country - has such a strong shot at the starting job, and smart money would bet on him to win it initially. This will be the most-watched position on the team by far.
FACEOFFS
I spent most of last year whining about crappy wing play, which was a legit complaint, and even so our faceoff guys had halfway solid years. Mick Parks, taking 80% of the draws, won at a .539 clip, and Tyler German in occasional relief was at .528. No, that's not awesome - sometimes those numbers get inflated against the Vermonts of the world. That said, that's not what happened last year, and that was despite apparently putting cement in the shoes and axle grease in the sticks of our wing players. This year, we get Shocker back, and that could be a big deal on faceoffs.
OUTLOOK
So I was, as it turned out, unrealistically optimistic about last year. You can't blame me for that. Pretty much any year, you expect at least to see a winning record. The other thing I said about last year, though, was that it was more of a setup year for the future. You can look it up. Not a whole lot of seniors were lost - it would've been nice to get Nick O'Reilly a fifth year, but the NCAA doesn't reward you for being suspended. As a tradeoff, LaPierre got one instead, so the only major losses were O'Reilly, White, and Prevas.
Even so, it's still a young team, with the seniors mainly clustered at midfield plus Cockerton. UVA will rely heavily on underclassmen like Scales, Pannell, a group of freshman attackmen, and whoever ends up in goal unless it's Heller. I expect the offense to be productive, with a chance (but only a chance) to be explosive. I like the defense; hell, I almost love it. The depth at SSDM is as good as any in the country, and the close-in guys are at the same time proven and up-and-coming. As for the guy in the crease - all we can do there is hope and pray. But early returns on Barrett sound at least reasonably encouraging.
As we saw last week, a couple teams on the schedule are in a down-cycle (Cornell and Hopkins, most notably) but it's still a crushing obstacle course. Think of the replacements (Loyola for OSU, Rutgers for Stony Brook, Richmond for Vermont) as mostly a wash, but then you tack Notre Dame on as an extra game. The ACC is just nasty good and UVA is not expected to fare well. But. With a defense that should keep us in most games and an offense poised to outperform last year, I feel good at least saying we'll head back to the tourney. It depends on a few surprise factors, like, say, James Pannell and goalie play, but if we believe at all in the reload-don't-rebuild mantra of powerhouse teams, those surprises are in the cards.
Fortunately, it's fair to say that so much went against UVA last season that the Hoos should improve just based on a rebound to the mean, in terms of luck. Two key players got hurt, and UVA lost a number of close games that, given the swing of a goal here and a goal there, would've turned a miserable season into at least a decent one.
This year, it'll be a set of mostly unfamiliar faces, with us sitting with bated breath (not "baited" breath) to see if one of them becomes the next Steele Stanwick or Matt Ward. As is traditional, position by position:
ATTACK
It's not as if there were no bright spots last season, and one of them returns for his senior year. If you want a breakout star, Mark Cockerton is a good choice, scoring 49 goals last season after netting 29 across his first two. Cockerton by himself took almost a quarter of UVA's shots. He's a pure finisher, with only 16 assists in three seasons.
That's where some new blood will have to come in. Without Nick O'Reilly or Matt White anymore to pass the ball, it'll be up to some unfamiliar names. Owen Van Arsdale is a decent passer, but his small stature and not-great shooting make it hard to keep him on the first attack unit if you can find better options. That's where James Pannell comes in.
The younger brother of Cornell's Rob Pannell, maybe the biggest name in college lacrosse the past couple years, Pannell was limited by an ankle injury all last season. Dom Starsia thinks he can be the next big name at Virginia, and he'll get every chance to do so. He's got the kind of playmaking skills UVA will need, and he and Cockerton are written in pen to start the season.
After that, you'll probably see Van Arsdale get his chances as the third guy, but three freshmen will also get their shot to impress. Ryan Lukakovic, A.J. Fish, and Joe French all got long looks in the scrimmage against Navy. French is a post-grad recruit and so has a little extra experience on the other two; Fish is huge for an attackman at 6'3"; Lukakovic comes in with the best recruiting credentials and has a little bit of a lead on the field. (Starsia came right out and told Jeff White he doesn't see Fish on the first line right now, but basically also said "don't forget about this guy either.") Expect the third attackman to rotate a little bit early on, until Starsia gets comfy with one of them; the three that don't make it will simply comprise the second line.
Pannell got a little burn last year, but mainly on a bum ankle, so he's almost as much a new name as these freshmen. It should be fun to watch this group come together, and if Pannell is the player he's hyped to be, it almost won't matter who the third attackman is. He and Cockerton have dynamic potential playing together. As long as a playmaker or two emerges, scoring should be up from last year.
OFFENSIVE MIDFIELD
Urgh....I hate trying to predict midfield lines because I'm always wrong. And we didn't get a lot of production out of them last year (in saying this, I'm just going to pretend Matt White was at attack where everyone wanted him.)
OK, fine, I can't do that. White was a midfielder, no matter how badly we wanted it to be otherwise, and he was a good player no matter where he was put. Replacing him will be tough. Rob Emery is the guy you think of first, and he's solid, but sat the scrimmage with an injury. He and Ryan Tucker are as close to a lock as you can get as a starting line of midfielders; Tucker shoots cannonballs and an increase from his 15-goal output would be highly welcome.
Again, the third guy remains a bit of a mystery at this point. Sophomore Greg Coholan got a couple starts last year, including the last game against Bellarmine, and played most of the season on the second unit; he's got a shot. The guy that would really get everyone perked up with interest, though, is freshman Zed Williams, a highly anticipated and talked-about recruit for some time now.
The second line will probably start with whichever of Coholan or Williams doesn't play on the first unit. Steady senior Pat Harbeson has some wheels and is likely to see time here. One certainly also imagines that the highly versatile and athletic Chris LaPierre will also at times be run out on the offense.
A nominal lineup to start the season might be Emery-Tucker-Coholan and Williams-Harbeson-someone; that someone might be Shocker but is just as likely to come from basically nowhere, if not more so since LaPierre is primarily a defender. At a minimum, Emery and Tucker should be counted on to provide some dangerous secondary scoring; the two should at least combine for 40 goals. Williams has a chance to be an X-factor. This is kind of a thin unit, and despite the skills of Emery and Tucker, possibly a little bit dependent on Williams for a shot of excitement.
SSDM
UVA is respectably deep here, with LaPierre returning from a lost season in which the Hoos were forced to develop his replacement early. Blake Riley and Bobby Hill both come back as seniors, joining LaPierre on the defense. Harbeson has been used at defense as well, though there's a clear gap between his skills and those of the others.
Look also for Carlson Milikin to get a shot - Milikin got a look from various schools, UVA included, as a football recruit, a pretty clear indication of the athleticism he could potentially bring. Milikin ought to get on the field if for no other reason than to get experience for the future, since every name I mentioned above is a senior.
That experience should turn out pretty good for UVA this season, though. At a minimum, LaPierre, Riley, and Hill are all high-quality players, and there exists some opportunity to get transition chances with this bunch too. LaPierre obviously - the Human Clear himself - is at his best on a dead sprint, but Hill is sneaky dangerous in transition too, and Harbeson's speed is useful as well. This might be quietly the strongest unit on the team.
LSM
Tanner Ottenbreit looks certain to monopolize the time here, the other three LSMs on the roster being the little-used Frank Price and two redshirt freshmen. I looked through my old posts for anything I'd ever written about Ottenbreit, who was also last year's starting LSM, and there was nothing except for a few sparse mentions about him taking the occasional faceoff. I think that means we'll be fine, but neither is Ottenbreit likely to light up the announcers and pundits a la Maryland's Jesse Bernhardt last year.
DEFENSE
There's a lot to like here. UVA gets Scott McWilliams back for his senior season; McWilliams blossomed last year and turned into a turnover machine. In a good way. McWilliams was fourth in the country in C/T per game last year. Add the ACC's Rookie of the Year in Tanner Scales, and you have the makings of a pretty solid close-in defense.
The third guy, unlike on offense, is no mystery either; it's Greg Danseglio, who's got versatility enough to also pop in at LSM, which he did at times last year. It sounds like a mathematical impossibility, but four defenders each started a majority of the games last season, and UVA only loses Harry Prevas out of that group.
For a possibility as a fourth player who could earn some time, look for transfer fifth-year Joseph Lisicky to chip in and help. Lisicky was a D-III All-American at Lynchburg College and an MLL draft pick in 2013, and there ought to be room for him on the field as well.
This ought to be a strong unit, maybe even stronger than last year even without Prevas. Nothing against Prevas, who was a solid player, but I'll still take a combined 30 starts with an extra year of experience and some accolades under their belt to boot. Scales forced his way into the lineup midseason and opened a lot of eyes, and McWilliams is a playmaker. I like the direction this unit is headed.
GOALIE
There's not much to say here except that UVA absolutely must get better goalie play than last year; neither Dan Marino nor Rhody Heller could manage even a .500 save percentage. Marino started the season and ended up benched, finishing at .455; Heller wasn't a lot better at .482. Getting just a pedestrian .510 out of those two (our opponents combined for .533) would've saved 11 goals, close to one per game - which in turn might well have put us in the tournament.
It's for that reason that freshman Matt Barrett - the #1 incoming freshman goalie in the country - has such a strong shot at the starting job, and smart money would bet on him to win it initially. This will be the most-watched position on the team by far.
FACEOFFS
I spent most of last year whining about crappy wing play, which was a legit complaint, and even so our faceoff guys had halfway solid years. Mick Parks, taking 80% of the draws, won at a .539 clip, and Tyler German in occasional relief was at .528. No, that's not awesome - sometimes those numbers get inflated against the Vermonts of the world. That said, that's not what happened last year, and that was despite apparently putting cement in the shoes and axle grease in the sticks of our wing players. This year, we get Shocker back, and that could be a big deal on faceoffs.
OUTLOOK
So I was, as it turned out, unrealistically optimistic about last year. You can't blame me for that. Pretty much any year, you expect at least to see a winning record. The other thing I said about last year, though, was that it was more of a setup year for the future. You can look it up. Not a whole lot of seniors were lost - it would've been nice to get Nick O'Reilly a fifth year, but the NCAA doesn't reward you for being suspended. As a tradeoff, LaPierre got one instead, so the only major losses were O'Reilly, White, and Prevas.
Even so, it's still a young team, with the seniors mainly clustered at midfield plus Cockerton. UVA will rely heavily on underclassmen like Scales, Pannell, a group of freshman attackmen, and whoever ends up in goal unless it's Heller. I expect the offense to be productive, with a chance (but only a chance) to be explosive. I like the defense; hell, I almost love it. The depth at SSDM is as good as any in the country, and the close-in guys are at the same time proven and up-and-coming. As for the guy in the crease - all we can do there is hope and pray. But early returns on Barrett sound at least reasonably encouraging.
As we saw last week, a couple teams on the schedule are in a down-cycle (Cornell and Hopkins, most notably) but it's still a crushing obstacle course. Think of the replacements (Loyola for OSU, Rutgers for Stony Brook, Richmond for Vermont) as mostly a wash, but then you tack Notre Dame on as an extra game. The ACC is just nasty good and UVA is not expected to fare well. But. With a defense that should keep us in most games and an offense poised to outperform last year, I feel good at least saying we'll head back to the tourney. It depends on a few surprise factors, like, say, James Pannell and goalie play, but if we believe at all in the reload-don't-rebuild mantra of powerhouse teams, those surprises are in the cards.
game preview: Boston College
Date/Time: Wednesday, February 5; 7:00
TV: ESPN2
Record against the Eagles: 9-7
Last meeting: BC 53, UVA 52; 3/3/13, Boston
Last game: UVA 48, Pitt 45 (2/2); ND 76, BC 73 (2/1)
KenPom:
Tempo:
UVA: 62.4 (#340)
BC: 63.3 (#326)
Offense:
UVA: 109.1 (#87)
BC: 112.4 (#40)
Defense:
UVA: 87.0 (#2)
BC: 111.1 (#287)
Pythag:
UVA: .9309 (#8)
BC: .5321 (#151)
Projected lineups:
Virginia:
PG: London Perrantes (4.4 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 3.8 apg)
SG: Malcolm Brogdon (11.8 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 2.2 apg)
SF: Joe Harris (11.5 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 2.2 apg)
PF: Akil Mitchell (6.8 ppg, 6.7 rpg, 1.3 apg)
C: Mike Tobey (7.6 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 0.4 apg)
Boston College:
PG: Joe Rahon (9.7 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 3.2 apg)
SG: Olivier Hanlan (17.9 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 2.9 apg)
SG: Lonnie Jackson (7.4 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 2.1 apg)
PF: Eddie Odio (4.9 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 0.8 apg)
PF: Ryan Anderson (15.0 ppg, 7.1 rpg, 1.3 apg)
I'm not gonna spend a lot of time on this because as I said yesterday, I have a to-do list. Tomorrow is Signing Day, which means our annual Signstravaganza. No, you're not getting up-to-the-minute updates because that's not how I roll. Yes, you'll get a pretty in-depth analysis of the class because that is how I roll. Thursday, I want to do a recap of the 2010 class, because I did that last year with 2009 and it was interesting. But Thursday is also the first lacrosse game of the year, so I'd like to maybe preview the team before that happens. Which means I'm gonna do my level best to make that happen tonight. Yup, it's a rare two-posts-in-one-day.
The story for this game is the same as the one for the next six that follow it: We should expect to win, probably need to in order to keep pace with Syracuse for the regular-season title, and regardless of these last two facts, will probably stumble at some point. Partly because math dictates the likelihood (KenPom probabilities give us slightly less than a 1-in-3 chance of slipping through the next seven totally unscathed.) Partly because February is a grind, it's always a grind, and it usually trips everyone up at some point because that's just how the season's dog days are. And partly because I'm still not totally sure if we can have nice things. All this said, if there's a tripping point in the coming month, it's probably not tomorrow night.
-- UVA on offense
Time for some really ugly facts about the opposition. They have six wins all season long. One is against something called Philadelphia University, which I'm assured by the Internet really does exist. Two are against Virginia Tech. BC would be winless in the ACC right now if VT wasn't such a clownshow.
The reason they're so rotten is defense. The Eagles don't seem to know how to play it. They're 287th in the country in defensive efficiency, sandwiched between 8-14 Eastern Illinois and 5-15 Central Arkansas. There's only one team they've held under a point a possession all season long. (I won't tell you who, but the answer's hilarious. And they did it twice.)
Up and down the list of stats that KenPom tracks, there's nothing BC does well. Especially bad: getting turnovers, blocking shots, defending threes. My sneaking suspicion: Teams are smart and know they can just pound the ball inside, as BC allows almost 50% shooting from two. So they do, and only shoot threes when it's a really good look, driving the 3-point shooting percentage close to 38% against the Eagles. That and scorers know they can get to the rim. BC's very low assist rate allowed (44% of buckets are assisted against the Eagles) and high percentage of 2-point shooting allowed suggest that it's fairly easy to break down their defense off the dribble.
Part of the reason for the ease in scoring in the paint is that BC has nothing resembling a center. There's freshman Will Magarity and that's about it, and he never played against Notre Dame in BC's last game. He's not going to be a difference-maker. Teams with centers - you know, like Mike Tobey - abuse BC's laughable post defense because their starting forwards are skinny beanpoles. Ryan Anderson is the biggest at 6'9", 216, meaning Anthony Gill has 15 pounds on him. Eddie Odio is 6'8", 209, and Alex Dragicevich, 6'8", 211. Tobey and Gill should have field days. Akil Mitchell should at a minimum get some putbacks, because the Eagles are cruddy rebounders too. Bottom line: Everyone else scores more or less at will on Boston College, so we should too.
-- UVA on defense
Back in my season preview of the Eagles I wrote what a weird collection of contradictions they are. Tall but lousy rebounders; great free-throw shooters but mediocre-at-best three-point shooting; a 6'8" guard (Dragicevich) but a 6'5" forward (Garland Owens.) Here's another one: BC is terrible at defense but the ACC's fourth-best offensive team, KenPom-wise.
The two brightest spots are Olivier Hanlan and Ryan Anderson. Hanlan's a terrific scorer who really knows how to break down a defender and can fill it from anywhere. Anderson's a very good low-post athlete. Both shoot a lot, both score a lot, and both draw just a ton of fouls.
Add to the mix Joe Rahon, who brings very good complementary scoring as a point guard, and three-point specialist Lonnie Jackson (awful when trying to score from two but a terrific shooter) and BC can hurt you a lot of different ways. They like to shoot threes and would have a really good shooting percentage as a team if they would stop certain players from taking them. (Anderson. And reserve guard Patrick Heckmann has been a better shooter in the past but is having a lousy year in that regard. Hanlan could probably stand to limit his shots somewhat too; his .330 percentage is OK but he leads the team in attempts, and shouldn't.)
BC has six ACC losses but has kept it close in basically all of them, even the 11-pointer to UNC and the 10-pointer to Syracuse, because they have a tendency to go on a run that nullifies their poor defense. They even led Cuse 51-46 after 30 minutes before the Orange got their act together and finished the game 23-8.
So as derelict as BC's defense is, their offense can almost keep up, making them at least a little dangerous. And they play nice and slow, as much so as UVA, which keeps games from getting out of hand. It's not like Tony Bennett will be jacking up the pace, so there'll be an onus on the defense to force Hanlan into volume shooting and take advantage of BC's lousy rebounding - one shot only.
-- Outlook
Ist das nicht un crappy team? Ja, das ist un crappy team. But the Hoos must be extra careful not to suffer a letdown. It's the classic time for it. If they don't, things will go just fine. The pack-line should shut down the Eagle offense at least just enough to let our own offense jump out to a lead. It's OK to be confident; the last time I thought we might be in for a potential letdown, the Hoos ground out a 20-pointer over Tech. I expect a similar boring blowout.
Final score: UVA 67, BC 53
Monday, February 3, 2014
the recruit: Donovan Dowling
Name: Donovan Dowling
Position: WR
Hometown: Richmond
School: Varina
Height: 6'1"
Weight: 205
24/7: 81, three stars; #193 WR, VA #48
ESPN: 72, three stars; #210 WR, VA #43, East #220
Rivals: 5.4, two stars
Scout: two stars
Other offers: Marshall, various I-AA
At this point in the recruiting series, we're going to have to establish some uncomfortable facts. Donovan Dowling committed in November, by which time nearly every door had been closed to Mike London on account of losing ten games (or being on the way to doing so.) The recruiting focus shifted almost exclusively to scrounging the bargain bin for projects and players who had, for whatever reason, missed out on the recruiting cycle. The reason I keep using words like "almost" is Jamil Kamara. Every commit besides him, from here on out, is such a project, most of them having either picked up football late or been injured right when they needed to be on the camp circuits. And while individually, each one of these guys has reasons they might pan out and be the proverbial diamond in the rough, the odds are against them. Collectively, there's just a lower chance of stardom from this batch. That's just going to have to be the overshadowing truth in the rest of these profiles.
Depressing stuff out of the way, Donovan Dowling is not one of those guys who is a physical freak who barely knows which way his shoulder pads go. He's been at this football thing for a while, though he was offered originally as the sort of generic athlete that Mike London offers all the time. In high school he was more productive than flashily athletic, this past season scoring five touchdowns of 82 or more yards. All in different ways, too, as he played both ways for Varina. As a junior he made the RTD's all-metro team as a receiver, catching 42 passes for 587 yards.
And finally, maybe the highest praise of all: his high school coach called him the most dominant player but one that he'd ever coached. So with that being the case, why the two-star ratings and utter lack of I-A offers?
My guess, and only guess because reporting on Dowling is slim, is that the answer can be found in ESPN's evaluation, which makes it clear he's got no explosion in his step. Usually you have to parse these reports a little bit; they're sensitive to being overly critical, so they use words like "flashes the ability to" or "can do X" in order to mean "doesn't always" or even "doesn't usually." If they specifically say "does not" or "is not" then they really mean it. And in Dowling's case, "quick twitch," "sudden athlete," and "initial quickness" are all phrases they use to describe what Dowling lacks.
This makes him a lousy fit as a cornerback and probably as a linebacker, which is occasionally mentioned - it would take a few years to teach the linebacker position to the point where he'd be useful. Especially outside 'backer. Safety would be a better bet, as Dowling is accustomed to playing defensive back and your quickness at safety is as much dependent on your mental acuity as physical skills. However, Dowling appears initially headed for wide receiver.
This is a logical choice for several reasons. One, the impending WR exodus, with E.J. Scott and Adrian Gamble transferring (well, I assume this on Gamble, but he's no longer on the team) and Pablo Alvarez not coming back for a fifth year. Slotting Dowling at receiver makes far better sense from a depth chart standpoint. It makes good sense from a skills standpoint too; ESPN, despite all that about not being a super athlete, gives him good marks on skills useful for a possession receiver: length and size, catching in a crowd, field savvy (i.e., finding the holes in a zone), adjusting to the ball, and so forth. Besides, a guy who scores a whole bunch of 80-yard touchdowns might not have a first gear, but he's probably got a fifth. (And top-end speed is not that useful for a cornerback - if you ever have to use it, you're already in deep trouble.)
The one problem with being a guy with possession-receiver skills in UVA's offense is that tight ends are really the possession receivers. Canaan Severin came in as such a player and has barely gotten off the ground. We haven't really used a possession receiver since Matt Snyder. If the coaches (whether that's London or a whole new staff) decide we need a possession receiver, though, Dowling is a guy to look at. I don't think he'll ever top out as a #1, all-ACC guy, but if he plays up to his potential (and he's a 4.0 GPA student, always a coachable sort of player) then I picture an efficient chain-mover, 20-30 catches, 250-350 yards on the stat sheet.
***************************************************
We can has nice things?
You didn't think I'd go and say nothing about the Pitt game, did you? It's just, I have a to-do list that I'm behind on, which is really a good position to be in given what I consider the #1 challenge of this whole operation, but it necessitates some doubling up if I want to get in some basketball talk sometimes. And damn do I ever want to get in some basketball talk.
You've heard me say it before: there's no reason a game has to be a defense-free scoring carnival to be entertaining. Those are fun - so is a clash of styles such as the VCU game, and so is a defensive slugfest where a basket is a really big deal and nobody ever gets so much as a five-point lead. You could almost hear Tony Bennett tell Jamie Dixon, "Ain't gonna be no rematch."
The whole time, I confess it, I was waiting for the shoe to drop, big time. I figured it was happening when Cameron Wright (a career .250 three-point shooter) heaved a shot-put.... with half a second left on the shot clock.... and Joe Harris all over him.... and it banks the hell in. Living proof that the ACC scheduling office and referees aren't the only ones who observe Rule 2(b). I further absolutely expected the referees to decide that the shot clock had properly reset on the scramble in which Pitt scored with -4 seconds left. The fact that they didn't - and apparently, that one of them was spotted giving the Genuine Home-Cookin' clock operator what for - renews a small amount of faith in ACC refs.
Giving them credit for not 2b-ing us probably says something about my jade-colored glasses, but it's nice to know these days that in the struggle between 2b and TB, Coach is winning. UVA now has a pelt for its wall, and the good news is that Pitt didn't even drop out of the top 25. I know - the top 25 means zilch, but it's just nice to have the warm and fuzzy that people who are paid for their opinions saw fit to reward UVA more than punish Pitt.
Most of the conference is now exactly halfway through their season, and UVA sits with a surprising two game lead on the field (said field consisting of Pitt and Duke) and a game back of Syracuse - and with the most favorable schedule in the whole league. The guaranteed tiebreaker over Pitt is nice, and we have an ace in the hole over Duke, too: the fact that Duke must still play Carolina twice, just in time for UNC to be belatedly hitting their stride. (Also, that Duke must play Carolina while wearing Duke uniforms, which tends to fire up the Heels because obviously it does.) Syracuse will visit Duke, Pitt, and Florida State, all the while looking over their shoulder hoping we stumble against the putz parade in the next month. (At some point, we probably will. It's just the nature of things. Let's all promise not to run off a cliff when that happens.)
If you'll allow me to think loftily for a minute, I'd say the ceiling for this team - should it make a miracle run through the schedule that doesn't stop until they're cutting down the nets in Greensboro - is a 2 seed. If UVA just takes care of business against Boston College on Wednesday, Lunardi will probably say 4 seed on Thursday. I'd be good with that. I'd be better with taking this sucker one game at a time - not because the cliche says you should, but because this is too much fun not to.
-- Mike Tobey could use some coaching on passing out of a double-team. That having been duly noted, the refs could use some coaching on the fact that when the ballhandler is bashed upside the head and shoved so hard he travels, "traveling" is not the correct call.
-- I wish someone had just told me that Wright's prayer-bucket, with 6:52 to go, would be Pitt's last points except for a single free throw. My cardiac rate could've used the help.
-- Lamar Patterson had a completely terrible game. He shot 1-for-10 inside the arc. Here's a list of other players who've had completely terrible games against UVA: T.J. Warren, Pat Connaughton, Jabari Parker, Jarell Eddie. What do they have in common? All but Connaughton are their team's leading scorer, yes - and generally, that they're small forwards guarded by Joe Harris, or else Akil Mitchell.
-- Jamel Artis is a fine player for Pitt - a freshman, so nowhere near the star, but probably going to develop into a pretty good hoopster. And I think you'll take it 10 times out of 10 when he's the leading scorer.
-- By my count, Pitt fans can now commiserate with five or six other groups of ACC fans, none of whom, apparently, saw their teams bring their best game to the floor against UVA. What lucky coincidence for us that nobody bothers to actually play well against UVA. Nine games in and nobody has seen fit to bring their so-called A-game. We're so lucky to have such an accommodating conference.
Position: WR
Hometown: Richmond
School: Varina
Height: 6'1"
Weight: 205
24/7: 81, three stars; #193 WR, VA #48
ESPN: 72, three stars; #210 WR, VA #43, East #220
Rivals: 5.4, two stars
Scout: two stars
Other offers: Marshall, various I-AA
At this point in the recruiting series, we're going to have to establish some uncomfortable facts. Donovan Dowling committed in November, by which time nearly every door had been closed to Mike London on account of losing ten games (or being on the way to doing so.) The recruiting focus shifted almost exclusively to scrounging the bargain bin for projects and players who had, for whatever reason, missed out on the recruiting cycle. The reason I keep using words like "almost" is Jamil Kamara. Every commit besides him, from here on out, is such a project, most of them having either picked up football late or been injured right when they needed to be on the camp circuits. And while individually, each one of these guys has reasons they might pan out and be the proverbial diamond in the rough, the odds are against them. Collectively, there's just a lower chance of stardom from this batch. That's just going to have to be the overshadowing truth in the rest of these profiles.
Depressing stuff out of the way, Donovan Dowling is not one of those guys who is a physical freak who barely knows which way his shoulder pads go. He's been at this football thing for a while, though he was offered originally as the sort of generic athlete that Mike London offers all the time. In high school he was more productive than flashily athletic, this past season scoring five touchdowns of 82 or more yards. All in different ways, too, as he played both ways for Varina. As a junior he made the RTD's all-metro team as a receiver, catching 42 passes for 587 yards.
And finally, maybe the highest praise of all: his high school coach called him the most dominant player but one that he'd ever coached. So with that being the case, why the two-star ratings and utter lack of I-A offers?
My guess, and only guess because reporting on Dowling is slim, is that the answer can be found in ESPN's evaluation, which makes it clear he's got no explosion in his step. Usually you have to parse these reports a little bit; they're sensitive to being overly critical, so they use words like "flashes the ability to" or "can do X" in order to mean "doesn't always" or even "doesn't usually." If they specifically say "does not" or "is not" then they really mean it. And in Dowling's case, "quick twitch," "sudden athlete," and "initial quickness" are all phrases they use to describe what Dowling lacks.
This makes him a lousy fit as a cornerback and probably as a linebacker, which is occasionally mentioned - it would take a few years to teach the linebacker position to the point where he'd be useful. Especially outside 'backer. Safety would be a better bet, as Dowling is accustomed to playing defensive back and your quickness at safety is as much dependent on your mental acuity as physical skills. However, Dowling appears initially headed for wide receiver.
This is a logical choice for several reasons. One, the impending WR exodus, with E.J. Scott and Adrian Gamble transferring (well, I assume this on Gamble, but he's no longer on the team) and Pablo Alvarez not coming back for a fifth year. Slotting Dowling at receiver makes far better sense from a depth chart standpoint. It makes good sense from a skills standpoint too; ESPN, despite all that about not being a super athlete, gives him good marks on skills useful for a possession receiver: length and size, catching in a crowd, field savvy (i.e., finding the holes in a zone), adjusting to the ball, and so forth. Besides, a guy who scores a whole bunch of 80-yard touchdowns might not have a first gear, but he's probably got a fifth. (And top-end speed is not that useful for a cornerback - if you ever have to use it, you're already in deep trouble.)
The one problem with being a guy with possession-receiver skills in UVA's offense is that tight ends are really the possession receivers. Canaan Severin came in as such a player and has barely gotten off the ground. We haven't really used a possession receiver since Matt Snyder. If the coaches (whether that's London or a whole new staff) decide we need a possession receiver, though, Dowling is a guy to look at. I don't think he'll ever top out as a #1, all-ACC guy, but if he plays up to his potential (and he's a 4.0 GPA student, always a coachable sort of player) then I picture an efficient chain-mover, 20-30 catches, 250-350 yards on the stat sheet.
***************************************************
We can has nice things?
You didn't think I'd go and say nothing about the Pitt game, did you? It's just, I have a to-do list that I'm behind on, which is really a good position to be in given what I consider the #1 challenge of this whole operation, but it necessitates some doubling up if I want to get in some basketball talk sometimes. And damn do I ever want to get in some basketball talk.
You've heard me say it before: there's no reason a game has to be a defense-free scoring carnival to be entertaining. Those are fun - so is a clash of styles such as the VCU game, and so is a defensive slugfest where a basket is a really big deal and nobody ever gets so much as a five-point lead. You could almost hear Tony Bennett tell Jamie Dixon, "Ain't gonna be no rematch."
The whole time, I confess it, I was waiting for the shoe to drop, big time. I figured it was happening when Cameron Wright (a career .250 three-point shooter) heaved a shot-put.... with half a second left on the shot clock.... and Joe Harris all over him.... and it banks the hell in. Living proof that the ACC scheduling office and referees aren't the only ones who observe Rule 2(b). I further absolutely expected the referees to decide that the shot clock had properly reset on the scramble in which Pitt scored with -4 seconds left. The fact that they didn't - and apparently, that one of them was spotted giving the Genuine Home-Cookin' clock operator what for - renews a small amount of faith in ACC refs.
Giving them credit for not 2b-ing us probably says something about my jade-colored glasses, but it's nice to know these days that in the struggle between 2b and TB, Coach is winning. UVA now has a pelt for its wall, and the good news is that Pitt didn't even drop out of the top 25. I know - the top 25 means zilch, but it's just nice to have the warm and fuzzy that people who are paid for their opinions saw fit to reward UVA more than punish Pitt.
Most of the conference is now exactly halfway through their season, and UVA sits with a surprising two game lead on the field (said field consisting of Pitt and Duke) and a game back of Syracuse - and with the most favorable schedule in the whole league. The guaranteed tiebreaker over Pitt is nice, and we have an ace in the hole over Duke, too: the fact that Duke must still play Carolina twice, just in time for UNC to be belatedly hitting their stride. (Also, that Duke must play Carolina while wearing Duke uniforms, which tends to fire up the Heels because obviously it does.) Syracuse will visit Duke, Pitt, and Florida State, all the while looking over their shoulder hoping we stumble against the putz parade in the next month. (At some point, we probably will. It's just the nature of things. Let's all promise not to run off a cliff when that happens.)
If you'll allow me to think loftily for a minute, I'd say the ceiling for this team - should it make a miracle run through the schedule that doesn't stop until they're cutting down the nets in Greensboro - is a 2 seed. If UVA just takes care of business against Boston College on Wednesday, Lunardi will probably say 4 seed on Thursday. I'd be good with that. I'd be better with taking this sucker one game at a time - not because the cliche says you should, but because this is too much fun not to.
-- Mike Tobey could use some coaching on passing out of a double-team. That having been duly noted, the refs could use some coaching on the fact that when the ballhandler is bashed upside the head and shoved so hard he travels, "traveling" is not the correct call.
-- I wish someone had just told me that Wright's prayer-bucket, with 6:52 to go, would be Pitt's last points except for a single free throw. My cardiac rate could've used the help.
-- Lamar Patterson had a completely terrible game. He shot 1-for-10 inside the arc. Here's a list of other players who've had completely terrible games against UVA: T.J. Warren, Pat Connaughton, Jabari Parker, Jarell Eddie. What do they have in common? All but Connaughton are their team's leading scorer, yes - and generally, that they're small forwards guarded by Joe Harris, or else Akil Mitchell.
-- Jamel Artis is a fine player for Pitt - a freshman, so nowhere near the star, but probably going to develop into a pretty good hoopster. And I think you'll take it 10 times out of 10 when he's the leading scorer.
-- By my count, Pitt fans can now commiserate with five or six other groups of ACC fans, none of whom, apparently, saw their teams bring their best game to the floor against UVA. What lucky coincidence for us that nobody bothers to actually play well against UVA. Nine games in and nobody has seen fit to bring their so-called A-game. We're so lucky to have such an accommodating conference.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
game preview: Pittsburgh
Date/Time: Sunday, February 2; 12:30
TV: ESPNUVA
Record against the Panthers: 7-3
Last meeting: UVA 84, Pitt 80; 12/3/90, Richmond, VA
Last game: UVA 68, ND 53 (1/28); Duke 80, Pitt 65 (1/27)
KenPom:
Tempo:
UVA: 63.0 (#335)
Pitt: 65.2 (#266)
Offense:
UVA: 109.5 (#77)
Pitt: 117.9 (#11)
Defense:
UVA: 88.2 (#2)
ND: 94.1 (#18)
Pythag:
UVA: .9231 (#13)
ND: .9304 (#8)
Projected lineups:
Virginia:
PG: London Perrantes (4.5 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 3.8 apg)
SG: Malcolm Brogdon (11.6 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 2.1 apg)
SF: Joe Harris (11.5 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 2.2 apg)
PF: Akil Mitchell (6.6 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 1.3 apg)
C: Mike Tobey (7.8 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 0.4 apg)
Pittsburgh:
PG: James Robinson (8.4 ppg, 2.6 rpg, 4.2 apg)
SG: Cameron Wright (10.8 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 2.9 apg)
SF: Lamar Patterson (17.7 ppg, 4.8 rpg, 4.5 apg)
PF: Michael Young (5.9 ppg, 4.9 rpg, 0.9 apg)
PF: Talib Zanna (13.5 ppg, 8.0 rpg, 0.5 apg)
Cutting right to the chase, this game is about one thing and one thing only: R-E-S-P-E-C-T. From the pollsters and, more importantly, the tourney committee. Here's the thing: the ACC has shaken out into tiers, as it tends to do, and there's a clear top four of Cuse, Pitt, Duke, and UVA. Duke beat Pitt and us, Cuse beat Duke and Pitt - and now there's Pitt and UVA going at it. We already aren't ranked at all, not even close in the ARV category, because we haven't really beaten anyone. We've just beaten the pulp out of most of our ACC competition, and knocked off SMU, I guess. FSU, maybe they count, maybe UNC, but still.
After Pitt, the schedule is a month worth of scrubs, ranging from the moderately dangerous (Clemson, Maryland) to the utter crap (BC, VT, Miami.) The next crack we have at a major tourney-bound team is in the next-to-last game of the year when Syracuse comes to town. It'll be nice to pile up wins, but here's a fact: unless we beat one of these other three teams, nobody will put us in a tier with them. There'll be a top three instead of a top four and we'll probably find ourselves a six seed at best. This is a great problem to have, by the way, but it's still a problem. So what's at stake in this game is no less than a top-three placement in the ACC. Winner gets it. Loser is fourth. Regardless of what the standings say, perception is reality, so that's how it'll be. So - this one's big.
-- UVA on offense
There isn't much of a weakness anywhere in Pitt's defense. They're a more athletic team than UVA has faced most of the way here in the ACC. As part of Lamar Patterson's do-absolutely-everything repertoire, he's a good defender who can grab steals, and shooting guard Cameron Wright gets even more. Very few teams can match UVA in defensive possession length, but Pitt come close.
They also rebound quite well, led in this regard by Talib Zanna, easily the best rebounder on the team. Backup power forward Derrick Randall scoops three boards a game in just ten minutes of time. As UVA has also rebounded very well on both ends of the court, the battle on the glass should be one of the best parts of the game.
Mike Tobey may have a slight advantage, though, as he'll be the tallest player on the court by two inches. Pitt doesn't have anyone over 6'9", a small strike against them. It's made them a middling shot-blocking team at best, which is probably the one chink in their armor. Remember I said Tobey would have a good game against Notre Dame because they don't block shots? And then remember how he did have a good game? Pitt's not any better at the shot-block - a little worse, actually. The difference is that Tobey will be going up against more athletic players as well as a team that might help on defense once a season. If Tobey scores another 14 points, though, I'll have no choice but to conclude he'll likely have a solid game any time he doesn't have to worry about his shot getting swatted.
Easier said than done, but UVA may be able to gain an advantage if they can put Pitt's guards in foul trouble. They don't foul much, which is good because there aren't many of them. Josh Newkirk is the only one they have off the bench, and he's nothing special; more often, Pitt waits until the matchups allow them to pull a guard and then they put a forward in - often backup wing Chris Jones - and have Lamar Patterson guard the two.
At least there's this: UVA's free throw shooting has been slightly better in ACC play, nudging the Hoos into the top 300 in FT%. Great news, I suppose. To win this game, they'll need to continue getting good, balanced scoring and break down the Pitt defense with good passing and some timely threes. In other words, play good offense. Great advice. It's the only way to get around a skilled, athletic defense like Pitt.
-- UVA on defense
You have to start any discussion of Pitt's offense with Lamar Patterson. It's constitutionally required. There's nothing he doesn't do, really. ESPN recently pointed out that he's the only player in the country shooting .500 on twos, .400 on threes, and averaging over four assists a game. He spreads his shots evenly around the court, and you can't foul him because he shoots 80% from the line. Patterson is almost assured a spot on the ACC first team, or else the voters are numbnuts.** UVA will need an athletic player guarding him - Justin Anderson seems a likely bet even though he's not a starter, and perhaps Malcolm Brogdon instead of Joe Harris. KenPom's player ratings place Patterson 4th in the entire country, with only Nick Johnson, Jabari Parker, and Doug McDermott ahead.
So that's a matchup nightmare through and through. Pitt also gets over 60% shooting on twos from Talib Zanna, but Zanna's effectiveness drops exponentially if you force him away from the rim. Whoever guards him, Akil Mitchell probably, has got to body up and get him as far from the net as possible, more so than usual when guarding a post player. It'll keep him off the offensive boards and kill his scoring effectiveness if Mitchell can do this.
Having lost sixth man Durand Johnson to a knee injury about three days after I wrote the Pitt preview, the Panthers only get reliable scoring from two other players. One is Cameron Wright, who's most effective in the midrange game but a crap three-point shooter, and the other is PG James Robinson, a pass-first point guard who also prefers the midrange jumper but is best when trying to get to the rim.
Beyond that, Pitt gets only marginal contributions from the five other rotation players. Backup PG Josh Newkirk, for example - the way to defend him is to overplay him hard, and if he drives around, hack him. He's shooting 1-for-10 from the line. Pitt is otherwise a generally excellent free-throw shooting team, so care is warranted, but UVA has little to fear from a Michael Young or a Jamel Artis, as long as UVA is rebounding.
This may be a favorable matchup for the pack-line. UVA will probably use the low-post double team on Zanna as much as humanly possible, fearing very little of Zanna's passing or the abilities of the rest of the frontcourt. The pack-line should hopefully discourage Robinson from driving the lane - you'd rather have him shooting jumpers. What to do about Patterson is another question entirely. Hope he has an off day, I guess.
-- Outlook
When I'm predicting these games, I usually have half an idea of what I want to go with before I start and develop the rest in my head as I go. I was hoping that the writing would help me out here more than usual. It's done nothing of the sort. Whether you think Pitt or UVA will win this game depends basically on a couple questions, not all of which are analytical. Is UVA good enough at their defensive system to shut down Pitt? Can we finally have nice things or are we destined, even when having a good season, to be not quite good enough? Can UVA hit just enough threes to stay within striking distance if not pull ahead? These are two pretty evenly matched teams and I have no idea what the answer is to any of those questions. Pitt has a talent edge, UVA a depth edge. And these days, I hardly know anymore whether it's OK to go on an optimistic streak. The shoe always drops, doesn't it?
Nevertheless, fuck it.
Final score: UVA 64, Pitt 61
Saturday, February 1, 2014
2014 lacrosse schedule
(For anyone looking for the updated ACC basketball sims, they are on that page, linked here.)
For the first time in a while, the lacrosse landscape changes from our perspective. Realignment is a fact of life in this sport, with the conferences shifting on a yearly basis. This year is no different - a new southern conference appears on the scene, the ECAC gets pillaged, and the ACC gets two new teams for a temporary total of six.
Not only does the conference look different, but UVA's schedule gets its most drastic makeover in years. Notre Dame is added by virtue of conference affiliation. There's a new season opener - Drexel remains on the schedule, but this season's first game will be against Loyola, a team UVA hasn't played in I don't know how long. And there's a new instate team, Richmond, which of course will be included - in fact, UVA is Richmond's first-ever varsity opponent. All in all, Loyola, Rutgers, Richmond, and Notre Dame appear while Vermont, Stony Brook, and Ohio State depart.
Of course, we'll be looking for a major rebound from last year's disappointment, but analysis of our own team will come next week - for now, just the opponents.
Here's a quick guide to what you'll see:
Conference: their conference, I guess
Preseason rank: media poll and coaches' poll, respectively
2013 computer: Laxpower's rank, out of 63
2013 record: figure it out
Last season: what happened when we played them
2013 O-rating: see below
2013 D-rating: see below
TV: if yes
O-rating and D-rating are my own concoction that I've included in lacrosse analysis for a while now; they consist of a KenPom-esque set of numbers that tempo-free the stats and give you an idea of the efficiency of each team. National average for 2013 was 15.33. Roughly (not precisely) over 16.5 puts you in the top quartile and below 13.5 in the bottom quartile, for offense; vice versa, obviously, for defense.
Loyola - Thursday, Feb. 6 - Home
Conference: Patriot
Preseason rank: 16th / 12th
2013 computer: 6th
2013 record: 11-5
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: 17.66 (10th)
2013 D-rating: 12.95 (11th)
TV: none
UVA hasn't played the Greyhounds since 1991; since then, they've raised their profile slightly on the national scene. A national title will do that. Loyola took home the crown in 2012. Last season they weren't quite able to match that lofty standard, but they did have a very good year regardless, and made the tourney as an at-large pick. This year they hop from the ECAC to the Patriot League in an all-sports move to that conference, helping to make the Patriot League lacrosse's largest with nine teams.
The challenge in facing Loyola will be a very strong veteran trio of attackmen in Justin Ward, Mike Sawyer, and Nikko Pontrello. Ward is a versatile playmaker; Sawyer potted 36 goals in 2013. Senior goalie Jack Runkel also returns, as do one defensemen and their starting LSM, all upperclassmen. It's a steep challenge to start the season, more so than Drexel usually provides, and Drexel's no slouch of a team. Loyola is a veteran bunch that's used to success and will be jonesing for a big win to start the season.
Richmond - Saturday, Feb. 8 - Road
Conference: Atlantic Sun
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: N/A
2013 record: N/A
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: N/A
2013 D-rating: N/A
TV: none
Richmond is one of four new teams on the scene this year (the others are Boston U., Furman, and Monmouth.) Their accession to Division I helped spur the creation of a long-expected southern conference, which this year will be the Atlantic Sun and in following years, the SoCon.
As a new team, there's obviously no past data to go on, but....it's not like they're gonna be good. The vast majority of the team, of course, is underclassmen. Even though the game's in Richmond it's likely to be played in front of a partisan UVA crowd and should be a blowout.
Drexel - Saturday, Feb. 15 - Away
Conference: CAA
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 24th
2013 record: 11-4
Last season: W, 13-12
2013 O-rating: 18.66 (8th)
2013 D-rating: 16.81 (46th)
TV: none
There are two symptoms here of the altered schedule - one, that Drexel won't be the season-opening game for the first time in over 10 years, and two, UVA used to cram the early-season schedule with midweek games and play none at all between their big Saturday games in the second half of the year (the Hopkinses and ACC games of the world); this year there's a full week between Richmond and Drexel and another full week between Drexel and the next game, Rutgers.
The Dragons weren't a deep offensive team last year, with really only seven players they could rely on for consistent scoring. (By which I mean a goal a game, at least.) Four return: midfielders Ben McIntosh and Ryan Belka, swingman Frank Fusco, and attackman Nick Trizano. McIntosh scored 38 goals last year, leading the team, and is also the leading returning distributor. Drexel also returns the lion's share of their defense, but that wasn't a good defense last year and relied on two freshman goalies. Cal Winkelman took the job midseason from Will Gabrielsen and was a clear but modest improvement, registering a .514 save percentage. Drexel returns a high-quality faceoff man in Nick Saputo, but must fix their defense and fill some large holes and find some depth on offense. This could be a bellwether game - UVA should find this game medium-easy if the Hoos are back to usual strength and may struggle if not.
Rutgers - Saturday, Feb. 22 - Home
Conference: Big East
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 44th
2013 record: 2-13
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: 13.85 (45th)
2013 D-rating: 15.26 (30th)
TV: none
Another unfamiliar opponent rolls into Klockner, and the first of three future and totally untraditional Big Ten teams on the schedule. This is Rutgers' last season in the Big East before next year's formation of Big Ten lacrosse.
Their 2-13 record last year was rotten as hell, made worse by the fact that their only wins were over Manhattan and Wagner, two of lacrosse's absolute worst. The record belied the stats, though; both the Laxpower computer and my tempo-free agree they weren't quite as bad as that record. Their downfall was a lack of scoring. Attackman Scott Klimchak scored 32, but was one of only six players with double-digit goals, and only one of those had more than 14.
The defense was at least respectable, though, finishing just inside the top half of the tempo-free ratings, thanks in large part to standout freshman goalie Will Alleyne. Alleyne posted a save percentage of .596, an excellent number, let alone for a freshman. He and nearly all of last season's team return, including elite FOGO Joseph Nardella, who boasted a .622 win percentage. The Scarlet Knights aren't really a Big East contender and probably no threat to make the NCAA tournament, but they should be much improved over last year and finish with a much more respectable record.

Mount St. Mary's - Tuesday, Feb. 25 - Away
Conference: NEC
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 45th
2013 record: 6-9
Last season: W, 18-11
2013 O-rating: 15.91 (20th)
2013 D-rating: 18.52 (53rd)
TV: none
It goes to show that records can be deceiving, when Mount St. Mary's is a notch below Rutgers in the computer rankings despite winning four more games. Conference competition has much to do with it, of course, as the NEC is one of the lowlier in the country.
Lowly is exactly where Mount St. Mary's will be this year. The team was rapaciously hit with eligibility expiration. Of the 155 goals and 90 assists the team scored last year, returning players account for 7 and 1, respectively. Absolutely mind-blowing losses. Nobody's going to recognize this team this year. And despite a pretty solid offense last year, the Mountaineers had a porous disaster zone of a defense. Having to replace everyone from the goalie to the attackers to the FOGO isn't going to help that situation - there's like, one lone defenseman starter returning. The Mount has been somewhat competitive of late, more so than usual, but this should be a blowout of VMI proportions. The only drama will be how soon we call off the dogs, and can the third and fourth string finish the quest for 20 goals?
Syracuse - Friday, Feb. 28 - Home
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 2nd / 1st
2013 computer: 10th
2013 record: 16-4
Last season: L, 9-8
2013 O-rating: 17.47 (12th)
2013 D-rating: 13.02 (12th)
TV: ESPN3 (ESPNU delay)
These guys are showing up in more or less the same place on the schedule, only now it counts for the conference. Syracuse's addition to the ACC, as you know if you've been reading long, is highly welcome around these parts, on account of us being the only ACC team that already played them every year anyway.
The Orange are picked as one of the national favorites by the media; I might place them a touch below that level, as they lose a couple of very crucial offensive players and they get only average goaltending from Dominic Lamolinara and below-average face-off work from Chris Daddio. They'll get excellent scoring punch from a top attack line of Kevin Rice, Dylan Donahue, and Derek Maltz. These guys are small but plenty talented (well, Maltz is a big dude, but the other two are nowhere near it.) Syracuse will also get to add Nicky Galasso to the lineup this year, a familiar name from his time at North Carolina. Galasso has struggled with injuries during his career but, if healthy, could be that X-factor that gives Syracuse the nudge they need to be a real national contender.

Cornell - Saturday, Mar. 8 - Away
Conference: Ivy League
Preseason rank: 18th / 16th
2013 computer: 1st
2013 record: 14-4
Last season: L, 12-11
2013 O-rating: 20.35 (4th)
2013 D-rating: 11.94 (4th)
TV: none (WTF)
By most metrics Cornell was one of the country's best teams last year and proved it with a trip to the Final Four as an unseeded team, utterly demolishing the 6 and 3 seeds along the way before falling in a close one to eventual champion Duke. The voters have given them a very lukewarm chance to repeat that performance, no doubt having much to do with the newfound large holes in their lineup.
Elite scorers Rob Pannell and Steve Mock are gone, as well as several other scorers and longtime goalie A.J. Fiore. Some pieces remain: Connor Buczek and Matt Donovan are the top two returning scorers, with 35 and 27 goals, respectively. Doug Tesoriero has always been an extremely tough face-off man, and two of three starting defensemen return in Tom Freshour and Jordan Stevens. But the early part of the season will be spent learning where their offense is coming from, and to further the difficulty, they'll be doing it with a new coach after Ben DeLuca was fired over a hazing investigation. Cornell may spend a year re-finding their way in a tough Ivy League, with Princeton, Yale, and Penn all ranked ahead in the media poll.

Notre Dame - Sunday, Mar. 16 - Away
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 5th / 5th
2013 computer: 15th
2013 record: 11-5
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: 15.68 (24th)
2013 D-rating: 11.58 (3rd)
TV: ESPNUVA
Bringing the Domers into the conference - and expediting the process - gives the ACC a tournament autobid for the first time. It means having to play them, though. The Irish come into the conference after enough time among the nation's top teams to be taken seriously as an ACC-worthy team. They've long been known as one of the country's stiflingly elite defensive teams, with just enough offense to hold their own.
Most of their core offense returns, with starting attackmen Matt Kavanagh (32 goals in 2013) and Conor Doyle likely to be joined by top second-liner John Scioscia. Jim Marlatt is the top midfield scoring option and a solid two-way player, and two of three starting D-men return with Stephen O'Hara and hulking senior Bryan Buglione.** There's every reason to believe Notre Dame will be just as tough to score on as always and probably again good enough on offense to make a run at the Final Four.
(The Italian name here is a little bit of a jarring presence among a roster rather fittingly loaded with Irish ones. Seriously, even for a preppy sport like lacrosse, it's noticeable, with O'Hara, Kelly, Connolly, Doyle, Corrigan, etc. all up and down the list, as well as multiple instances of Pat, Liam, Conor, Ryan, and Kyle. It's like the Irish national team instead of the Fighting Irish.)

Johns Hopkins - Saturday, Mar. 22 - Home
Conference: Independent
Preseason rank: 13th / 11th
2013 computer: 3rd
2013 record: 9-5
Last season: L, 15-8
2013 O-rating: 16.79 (14th)
2013 D-rating: 11.17 (1st)
TV: ESPNUVA
Part of the reason the Big Ten is on my shit list these days is because of Hopkins. A natural fit in the ACC, they chose to go B1G for next year - the conference and the school wanted access to each other's research powerhouses, and the need to add a sixth lacrosse school was really more of an excuse than a driving force.
Anyway. Neither here nor there for this season. Like Cornell, the voters are skeptical of the Hop's ability to return to the national elite after being slammed by graduation. Offensive ringleader Wells Stanwick does return, but 17-goal scorer Ryan Brown is the only other primary returner on offense. The Blue Jays must also replace their outstanding netminder Pierce Bassett as well as most of their defense. Nobody seriously expects them to drop out of the picture entirely, as Stanwick might singlehandedly keep them in a lot of games and they should be able to find some offense where needed. But they're not quite the usual dreadnought this year.

VMI - Tuesday, Mar. 25 - Home
Conference: Atlantic Sun
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 62nd
2013 record: 1-12
Last season: W, 18-4
2013 O-rating: 9.19 (63rd)
2013 D-rating: 20.31 (62nd)
TV: none
Ever little more than a scrimmage that counts, the VMI game moves to the middle of the season to accommodate the schedule shuffle. VMI is never good, they're not going to be good this year, and I'd suggest that the move to the A-Sun might be good for them except that they always get rocked even by the worst teams in the country. Like, Wagner, the only team to finish below them in Laxpower's computer. Losing their top two scorers and goalie to graduation is not bloody likely to improve their situation, and they'll probably go one-win even in their new conference of brand-new programs.

Maryland - Sunday, Mar. 30 - Away
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 6th / 6th
2013 computer: 5th
2013 record: 10-4
Last season: L, 9-7; W, 13-6
2013 O-rating: 18.36 (9th)
2013 D-rating: 12.26 (8th)
TV: ESPNUVA
Is this the last year for Hit A Terp With A Stick Week? I'm not sure how I feel about that exactly; Virginia-Maryland really should be a thing and the douche factor is rather less in lacrosse than in sports where the coach boasts about never losing to Virginia and then hilariously reels off long losing streaks to Virginia. On the other hand, if they don't value the game, why should we?
Defense should be Maryland's strong suit this year, with standout goalie Niko Amato in his senior year and all three starting defensemen - Casey Ikeda, Goran Murray, and Michael Ehrhardt - all back as well. Lately the Terps have relied on a balanced scoring attack, but most familiar names are out the door, with only Mike Chanenchuk and Jay Carlson returning among double-digit goal scorers from last season. Poll voters placed Maryland near the bottom of the ACC, but they'll at least be tough to score on.

North Carolina - Saturday, Apr. 5 - Away
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 3rd / 2nd
2013 computer: 2nd
2013 record: 13-4
Last season: L, 10-7; L, 16-13
2013 O-rating: 18.36 (9th)
2013 D-rating: 12.26 (8th)
TV: ESPNUVA
The defending ACC champs should be among the favorites to repeat this year. A couple of key losses will be overshadowed by returning scoring punch in Joey Sankey and Jimmy Bitter, both 30+ goal scorers in 2013. UNC will additionally have some real midfield sniping power in returning starter Chad Tutton and perhaps a second-liner from last year, Ryan Creighton, who put almost 90% of his shots on goal in 2013.
Turnover-generating defenseman Kieran McDonald is out the door this year, but Carolina is fairly deep on defense and should be able to replace him; not only that, but they rode a freshman goalie within a hair's breadth of the Final Four last season, so they should get high-quality net play from Kieran Burke this year and far into the future, too. Since the Heels attend a class-optional school (sorry, couldn't help myself) they should be well-focused on bringing back the ACC title to Chapel Hill and will be a formidable obstacle.

Duke - Friday, Apr. 11 - Home
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 1st / 3rd
2013 computer: 4th
2013 record: 16-5
Last season: L, 19-16
2013 O-rating: 20.93 (2nd)
2013 D-rating: 14.19 (20th)
TV: ESPNUVA
UVA' annual bugaboo comes into this season with the added distinction of being the defending national champs. Their modus operandi last season was to overwhelm with offense, and they came within a few hundredths of a point of being the most powerful offensive team in the nation. The two top goal-scorers, Jordan Wolf with 57 and Josh Dionne with 45, both return to ensure the Blue Devils' offense remains a nasty challenge. Playmaking attackman Case Matheis also returns, as do a couple of potentially powerful midfielders, sophomores Myles Jones and Deemer Class.
Not only is Duke's offense an absolute machine, but with FOGO Brendan Fowler they can play make-it-take-it; Fowler took 526 face-offs last year and won over 64%, setting an ACC record for face-offs won and winning the NCAA championship Most Outstanding Player. Senior defensemen Henry Lobb and Chris Hipps return to anchor the defense, and both stand 6'4". One weak point may be in net, where Kyle Turri unseated (the never much good) Dan Wigrizer last year, but still failed to reach a .500 save percentage.
Still, in the disagreement between the media and the coaches over who's the preseason favorite (the coaches picked Syracuse) I'd have to side with the media. Duke is an offensive juggernaut right now, and unlike Syracuse, brings back most of their best players. Call 'em the favorite to win the ACC and a leader in the national title race.

Bellarmine - Saturday, Apr. 19 - Home
Conference: ECAC
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 28th
2013 record: 7-7
Last season: W, 12-7
2013 O-rating: 12.11 (57th)
2013 D-rating: 12.12 (7th)
TV: ESPNUVA
Unlike in recent years past, this game takes place before the ACC tournament. Bellarmine has done a nice job building itself up to a competitive level despite jumping to D-I only as recently as 2006. This year, though, they face an uphill climb. Of their major scorers, only midfielder Cameron Gardner returns, and Bellarmine never was a prolific scoring team to begin with, ranking near the very bottom in offensive efficiency below such luminaries as Manhattan and Vermont. They'll also have to replace all-everything goalie Dillon Ward. The ECAC is an emaciated (and soon to be extinct) conference, having lost Denver and Loyola, but the Knights even so will find it tough to gain much ground.
*************************************************
It's tough to see a losing season in UVA lacrosse, but let's also keep in mind how close so many of the games really were. OT loss to Syracuse, one goal down to Cornell and OSU, two to Maryland. Flip a couple of those games and UVA is in the tournament, more than likely.
This year, the tournament is, as predicted, bigger, a change announced in the fall. The tourney goes to 18 teams, the inevitable result of the addition of auto-bid conferences, of which the ACC is now one. The four lowest-ranked autobid teams in the RPI will go to the play-ins (these almost certainly will be out of the A-East, A-Sun, NEC, and MAAC) but the upshot is that the chance for at-large bids stays just as it was last year, with eight available. (Edit: Actually, now that I think about it, one extra, since the ACC champ, which always took an at-large spot, now is accounted for in the autobids.) And also that winning the ACC tourney, which (despite the utter worthlessness of the POS ACC website, which says nothing about the subject) appears to be restricted to four teams. It'll be vital to not finish in the bottom two - and both polls have UVA doing just that. (We're 8th and 7th, but the coaches decided that the ACC completely owns lacrosse and put all six teams in the top seven.)
So we'll have to do something in the ACC besides lose every game, but certain other teams on the schedule - notably Cornell and Hopkins - also appear somewhat vulnerable. From just a schedule standpoint, UVA stands to improve, though we're not going to be seen as a top conference contender unless we pull off an upset or two.
For the first time in a while, the lacrosse landscape changes from our perspective. Realignment is a fact of life in this sport, with the conferences shifting on a yearly basis. This year is no different - a new southern conference appears on the scene, the ECAC gets pillaged, and the ACC gets two new teams for a temporary total of six.
Not only does the conference look different, but UVA's schedule gets its most drastic makeover in years. Notre Dame is added by virtue of conference affiliation. There's a new season opener - Drexel remains on the schedule, but this season's first game will be against Loyola, a team UVA hasn't played in I don't know how long. And there's a new instate team, Richmond, which of course will be included - in fact, UVA is Richmond's first-ever varsity opponent. All in all, Loyola, Rutgers, Richmond, and Notre Dame appear while Vermont, Stony Brook, and Ohio State depart.
Of course, we'll be looking for a major rebound from last year's disappointment, but analysis of our own team will come next week - for now, just the opponents.
Here's a quick guide to what you'll see:
Conference: their conference, I guess
Preseason rank: media poll and coaches' poll, respectively
2013 computer: Laxpower's rank, out of 63
2013 record: figure it out
Last season: what happened when we played them
2013 O-rating: see below
2013 D-rating: see below
TV: if yes
O-rating and D-rating are my own concoction that I've included in lacrosse analysis for a while now; they consist of a KenPom-esque set of numbers that tempo-free the stats and give you an idea of the efficiency of each team. National average for 2013 was 15.33. Roughly (not precisely) over 16.5 puts you in the top quartile and below 13.5 in the bottom quartile, for offense; vice versa, obviously, for defense.
Loyola - Thursday, Feb. 6 - Home
Conference: Patriot
Preseason rank: 16th / 12th
2013 computer: 6th
2013 record: 11-5
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: 17.66 (10th)
2013 D-rating: 12.95 (11th)
TV: none
UVA hasn't played the Greyhounds since 1991; since then, they've raised their profile slightly on the national scene. A national title will do that. Loyola took home the crown in 2012. Last season they weren't quite able to match that lofty standard, but they did have a very good year regardless, and made the tourney as an at-large pick. This year they hop from the ECAC to the Patriot League in an all-sports move to that conference, helping to make the Patriot League lacrosse's largest with nine teams.
The challenge in facing Loyola will be a very strong veteran trio of attackmen in Justin Ward, Mike Sawyer, and Nikko Pontrello. Ward is a versatile playmaker; Sawyer potted 36 goals in 2013. Senior goalie Jack Runkel also returns, as do one defensemen and their starting LSM, all upperclassmen. It's a steep challenge to start the season, more so than Drexel usually provides, and Drexel's no slouch of a team. Loyola is a veteran bunch that's used to success and will be jonesing for a big win to start the season.

Conference: Atlantic Sun
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: N/A
2013 record: N/A
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: N/A
2013 D-rating: N/A
TV: none
Richmond is one of four new teams on the scene this year (the others are Boston U., Furman, and Monmouth.) Their accession to Division I helped spur the creation of a long-expected southern conference, which this year will be the Atlantic Sun and in following years, the SoCon.
As a new team, there's obviously no past data to go on, but....it's not like they're gonna be good. The vast majority of the team, of course, is underclassmen. Even though the game's in Richmond it's likely to be played in front of a partisan UVA crowd and should be a blowout.
Drexel - Saturday, Feb. 15 - Away
Conference: CAA
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 24th
2013 record: 11-4
Last season: W, 13-12
2013 O-rating: 18.66 (8th)
2013 D-rating: 16.81 (46th)
TV: none
There are two symptoms here of the altered schedule - one, that Drexel won't be the season-opening game for the first time in over 10 years, and two, UVA used to cram the early-season schedule with midweek games and play none at all between their big Saturday games in the second half of the year (the Hopkinses and ACC games of the world); this year there's a full week between Richmond and Drexel and another full week between Drexel and the next game, Rutgers.
The Dragons weren't a deep offensive team last year, with really only seven players they could rely on for consistent scoring. (By which I mean a goal a game, at least.) Four return: midfielders Ben McIntosh and Ryan Belka, swingman Frank Fusco, and attackman Nick Trizano. McIntosh scored 38 goals last year, leading the team, and is also the leading returning distributor. Drexel also returns the lion's share of their defense, but that wasn't a good defense last year and relied on two freshman goalies. Cal Winkelman took the job midseason from Will Gabrielsen and was a clear but modest improvement, registering a .514 save percentage. Drexel returns a high-quality faceoff man in Nick Saputo, but must fix their defense and fill some large holes and find some depth on offense. This could be a bellwether game - UVA should find this game medium-easy if the Hoos are back to usual strength and may struggle if not.

Conference: Big East
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 44th
2013 record: 2-13
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: 13.85 (45th)
2013 D-rating: 15.26 (30th)
TV: none
Another unfamiliar opponent rolls into Klockner, and the first of three future and totally untraditional Big Ten teams on the schedule. This is Rutgers' last season in the Big East before next year's formation of Big Ten lacrosse.
Their 2-13 record last year was rotten as hell, made worse by the fact that their only wins were over Manhattan and Wagner, two of lacrosse's absolute worst. The record belied the stats, though; both the Laxpower computer and my tempo-free agree they weren't quite as bad as that record. Their downfall was a lack of scoring. Attackman Scott Klimchak scored 32, but was one of only six players with double-digit goals, and only one of those had more than 14.
The defense was at least respectable, though, finishing just inside the top half of the tempo-free ratings, thanks in large part to standout freshman goalie Will Alleyne. Alleyne posted a save percentage of .596, an excellent number, let alone for a freshman. He and nearly all of last season's team return, including elite FOGO Joseph Nardella, who boasted a .622 win percentage. The Scarlet Knights aren't really a Big East contender and probably no threat to make the NCAA tournament, but they should be much improved over last year and finish with a much more respectable record.

Mount St. Mary's - Tuesday, Feb. 25 - Away
Conference: NEC
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 45th
2013 record: 6-9
Last season: W, 18-11
2013 O-rating: 15.91 (20th)
2013 D-rating: 18.52 (53rd)
TV: none
It goes to show that records can be deceiving, when Mount St. Mary's is a notch below Rutgers in the computer rankings despite winning four more games. Conference competition has much to do with it, of course, as the NEC is one of the lowlier in the country.
Lowly is exactly where Mount St. Mary's will be this year. The team was rapaciously hit with eligibility expiration. Of the 155 goals and 90 assists the team scored last year, returning players account for 7 and 1, respectively. Absolutely mind-blowing losses. Nobody's going to recognize this team this year. And despite a pretty solid offense last year, the Mountaineers had a porous disaster zone of a defense. Having to replace everyone from the goalie to the attackers to the FOGO isn't going to help that situation - there's like, one lone defenseman starter returning. The Mount has been somewhat competitive of late, more so than usual, but this should be a blowout of VMI proportions. The only drama will be how soon we call off the dogs, and can the third and fourth string finish the quest for 20 goals?

Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 2nd / 1st
2013 computer: 10th
2013 record: 16-4
Last season: L, 9-8
2013 O-rating: 17.47 (12th)
2013 D-rating: 13.02 (12th)
TV: ESPN3 (ESPNU delay)
These guys are showing up in more or less the same place on the schedule, only now it counts for the conference. Syracuse's addition to the ACC, as you know if you've been reading long, is highly welcome around these parts, on account of us being the only ACC team that already played them every year anyway.
The Orange are picked as one of the national favorites by the media; I might place them a touch below that level, as they lose a couple of very crucial offensive players and they get only average goaltending from Dominic Lamolinara and below-average face-off work from Chris Daddio. They'll get excellent scoring punch from a top attack line of Kevin Rice, Dylan Donahue, and Derek Maltz. These guys are small but plenty talented (well, Maltz is a big dude, but the other two are nowhere near it.) Syracuse will also get to add Nicky Galasso to the lineup this year, a familiar name from his time at North Carolina. Galasso has struggled with injuries during his career but, if healthy, could be that X-factor that gives Syracuse the nudge they need to be a real national contender.

Cornell - Saturday, Mar. 8 - Away
Conference: Ivy League
Preseason rank: 18th / 16th
2013 computer: 1st
2013 record: 14-4
Last season: L, 12-11
2013 O-rating: 20.35 (4th)
2013 D-rating: 11.94 (4th)
TV: none (WTF)
By most metrics Cornell was one of the country's best teams last year and proved it with a trip to the Final Four as an unseeded team, utterly demolishing the 6 and 3 seeds along the way before falling in a close one to eventual champion Duke. The voters have given them a very lukewarm chance to repeat that performance, no doubt having much to do with the newfound large holes in their lineup.
Elite scorers Rob Pannell and Steve Mock are gone, as well as several other scorers and longtime goalie A.J. Fiore. Some pieces remain: Connor Buczek and Matt Donovan are the top two returning scorers, with 35 and 27 goals, respectively. Doug Tesoriero has always been an extremely tough face-off man, and two of three starting defensemen return in Tom Freshour and Jordan Stevens. But the early part of the season will be spent learning where their offense is coming from, and to further the difficulty, they'll be doing it with a new coach after Ben DeLuca was fired over a hazing investigation. Cornell may spend a year re-finding their way in a tough Ivy League, with Princeton, Yale, and Penn all ranked ahead in the media poll.

Notre Dame - Sunday, Mar. 16 - Away
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 5th / 5th
2013 computer: 15th
2013 record: 11-5
Last season: N/A
2013 O-rating: 15.68 (24th)
2013 D-rating: 11.58 (3rd)
TV: ESPNUVA
Bringing the Domers into the conference - and expediting the process - gives the ACC a tournament autobid for the first time. It means having to play them, though. The Irish come into the conference after enough time among the nation's top teams to be taken seriously as an ACC-worthy team. They've long been known as one of the country's stiflingly elite defensive teams, with just enough offense to hold their own.
Most of their core offense returns, with starting attackmen Matt Kavanagh (32 goals in 2013) and Conor Doyle likely to be joined by top second-liner John Scioscia. Jim Marlatt is the top midfield scoring option and a solid two-way player, and two of three starting D-men return with Stephen O'Hara and hulking senior Bryan Buglione.** There's every reason to believe Notre Dame will be just as tough to score on as always and probably again good enough on offense to make a run at the Final Four.
(The Italian name here is a little bit of a jarring presence among a roster rather fittingly loaded with Irish ones. Seriously, even for a preppy sport like lacrosse, it's noticeable, with O'Hara, Kelly, Connolly, Doyle, Corrigan, etc. all up and down the list, as well as multiple instances of Pat, Liam, Conor, Ryan, and Kyle. It's like the Irish national team instead of the Fighting Irish.)

Johns Hopkins - Saturday, Mar. 22 - Home
Conference: Independent
Preseason rank: 13th / 11th
2013 computer: 3rd
2013 record: 9-5
Last season: L, 15-8
2013 O-rating: 16.79 (14th)
2013 D-rating: 11.17 (1st)
TV: ESPNUVA
Part of the reason the Big Ten is on my shit list these days is because of Hopkins. A natural fit in the ACC, they chose to go B1G for next year - the conference and the school wanted access to each other's research powerhouses, and the need to add a sixth lacrosse school was really more of an excuse than a driving force.
Anyway. Neither here nor there for this season. Like Cornell, the voters are skeptical of the Hop's ability to return to the national elite after being slammed by graduation. Offensive ringleader Wells Stanwick does return, but 17-goal scorer Ryan Brown is the only other primary returner on offense. The Blue Jays must also replace their outstanding netminder Pierce Bassett as well as most of their defense. Nobody seriously expects them to drop out of the picture entirely, as Stanwick might singlehandedly keep them in a lot of games and they should be able to find some offense where needed. But they're not quite the usual dreadnought this year.

VMI - Tuesday, Mar. 25 - Home
Conference: Atlantic Sun
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 62nd
2013 record: 1-12
Last season: W, 18-4
2013 O-rating: 9.19 (63rd)
2013 D-rating: 20.31 (62nd)
TV: none
Ever little more than a scrimmage that counts, the VMI game moves to the middle of the season to accommodate the schedule shuffle. VMI is never good, they're not going to be good this year, and I'd suggest that the move to the A-Sun might be good for them except that they always get rocked even by the worst teams in the country. Like, Wagner, the only team to finish below them in Laxpower's computer. Losing their top two scorers and goalie to graduation is not bloody likely to improve their situation, and they'll probably go one-win even in their new conference of brand-new programs.

Maryland - Sunday, Mar. 30 - Away
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 6th / 6th
2013 computer: 5th
2013 record: 10-4
Last season: L, 9-7; W, 13-6
2013 O-rating: 18.36 (9th)
2013 D-rating: 12.26 (8th)
TV: ESPNUVA
Is this the last year for Hit A Terp With A Stick Week? I'm not sure how I feel about that exactly; Virginia-Maryland really should be a thing and the douche factor is rather less in lacrosse than in sports where the coach boasts about never losing to Virginia and then hilariously reels off long losing streaks to Virginia. On the other hand, if they don't value the game, why should we?
Defense should be Maryland's strong suit this year, with standout goalie Niko Amato in his senior year and all three starting defensemen - Casey Ikeda, Goran Murray, and Michael Ehrhardt - all back as well. Lately the Terps have relied on a balanced scoring attack, but most familiar names are out the door, with only Mike Chanenchuk and Jay Carlson returning among double-digit goal scorers from last season. Poll voters placed Maryland near the bottom of the ACC, but they'll at least be tough to score on.

North Carolina - Saturday, Apr. 5 - Away
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 3rd / 2nd
2013 computer: 2nd
2013 record: 13-4
Last season: L, 10-7; L, 16-13
2013 O-rating: 18.36 (9th)
2013 D-rating: 12.26 (8th)
TV: ESPNUVA
The defending ACC champs should be among the favorites to repeat this year. A couple of key losses will be overshadowed by returning scoring punch in Joey Sankey and Jimmy Bitter, both 30+ goal scorers in 2013. UNC will additionally have some real midfield sniping power in returning starter Chad Tutton and perhaps a second-liner from last year, Ryan Creighton, who put almost 90% of his shots on goal in 2013.
Turnover-generating defenseman Kieran McDonald is out the door this year, but Carolina is fairly deep on defense and should be able to replace him; not only that, but they rode a freshman goalie within a hair's breadth of the Final Four last season, so they should get high-quality net play from Kieran Burke this year and far into the future, too. Since the Heels attend a class-optional school (sorry, couldn't help myself) they should be well-focused on bringing back the ACC title to Chapel Hill and will be a formidable obstacle.

Duke - Friday, Apr. 11 - Home
Conference: ACC
Preseason rank: 1st / 3rd
2013 computer: 4th
2013 record: 16-5
Last season: L, 19-16
2013 O-rating: 20.93 (2nd)
2013 D-rating: 14.19 (20th)
TV: ESPNUVA
UVA' annual bugaboo comes into this season with the added distinction of being the defending national champs. Their modus operandi last season was to overwhelm with offense, and they came within a few hundredths of a point of being the most powerful offensive team in the nation. The two top goal-scorers, Jordan Wolf with 57 and Josh Dionne with 45, both return to ensure the Blue Devils' offense remains a nasty challenge. Playmaking attackman Case Matheis also returns, as do a couple of potentially powerful midfielders, sophomores Myles Jones and Deemer Class.
Not only is Duke's offense an absolute machine, but with FOGO Brendan Fowler they can play make-it-take-it; Fowler took 526 face-offs last year and won over 64%, setting an ACC record for face-offs won and winning the NCAA championship Most Outstanding Player. Senior defensemen Henry Lobb and Chris Hipps return to anchor the defense, and both stand 6'4". One weak point may be in net, where Kyle Turri unseated (the never much good) Dan Wigrizer last year, but still failed to reach a .500 save percentage.
Still, in the disagreement between the media and the coaches over who's the preseason favorite (the coaches picked Syracuse) I'd have to side with the media. Duke is an offensive juggernaut right now, and unlike Syracuse, brings back most of their best players. Call 'em the favorite to win the ACC and a leader in the national title race.

Bellarmine - Saturday, Apr. 19 - Home
Conference: ECAC
Preseason rank: NR / NR
2013 computer: 28th
2013 record: 7-7
Last season: W, 12-7
2013 O-rating: 12.11 (57th)
2013 D-rating: 12.12 (7th)
TV: ESPNUVA
Unlike in recent years past, this game takes place before the ACC tournament. Bellarmine has done a nice job building itself up to a competitive level despite jumping to D-I only as recently as 2006. This year, though, they face an uphill climb. Of their major scorers, only midfielder Cameron Gardner returns, and Bellarmine never was a prolific scoring team to begin with, ranking near the very bottom in offensive efficiency below such luminaries as Manhattan and Vermont. They'll also have to replace all-everything goalie Dillon Ward. The ECAC is an emaciated (and soon to be extinct) conference, having lost Denver and Loyola, but the Knights even so will find it tough to gain much ground.
*************************************************
It's tough to see a losing season in UVA lacrosse, but let's also keep in mind how close so many of the games really were. OT loss to Syracuse, one goal down to Cornell and OSU, two to Maryland. Flip a couple of those games and UVA is in the tournament, more than likely.
This year, the tournament is, as predicted, bigger, a change announced in the fall. The tourney goes to 18 teams, the inevitable result of the addition of auto-bid conferences, of which the ACC is now one. The four lowest-ranked autobid teams in the RPI will go to the play-ins (these almost certainly will be out of the A-East, A-Sun, NEC, and MAAC) but the upshot is that the chance for at-large bids stays just as it was last year, with eight available. (Edit: Actually, now that I think about it, one extra, since the ACC champ, which always took an at-large spot, now is accounted for in the autobids.) And also that winning the ACC tourney, which (despite the utter worthlessness of the POS ACC website, which says nothing about the subject) appears to be restricted to four teams. It'll be vital to not finish in the bottom two - and both polls have UVA doing just that. (We're 8th and 7th, but the coaches decided that the ACC completely owns lacrosse and put all six teams in the top seven.)
So we'll have to do something in the ACC besides lose every game, but certain other teams on the schedule - notably Cornell and Hopkins - also appear somewhat vulnerable. From just a schedule standpoint, UVA stands to improve, though we're not going to be seen as a top conference contender unless we pull off an upset or two.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)