Friday, February 10, 2012

game preview: North Carolina


Date/Time: Saturday, February 11; 1:00

TV: ACC Net., ESPN3

Record against the Heels: 49-125

Last matchup: UNC 62, UVA 56; 1/8/11; Charlottesville

Last game: UVA 68, Wake 44 (2/8); Duke 85, UNC 84 (2/8)

Opposing blogs: Tar Heel Blog, Carolina March

KenPom breakdown:

Tempo:
UVA: 60.2 (#339)
UNC: 74.2 (#5)

Offense:
UVA: 106.0 (#81)
UNC: 114.0 (#15)

Defense:
UVA: 85.6 (#7)
UNC: 88.6 (#16)

Pythag:
UVA: .8992 (#18)
UNC: .9300 (#8)

Common opponents:

Boston College: UVA won 66-49; UNC won 83-60
Miami: UVA won 52-51; UNC won 73-56
Florida State: UVA lost 58-55; UNC lost 90-57
Virginia Tech: UVA lost 47-45; UNC won 82-68
NC State: UVA won 61-60; UNC won 74-55
Georgia Tech: UVA won 70-38; UNC won 93-81
Wake Forest: UVA won 68-44; UNC won 68-53
Duke: UVA lost 61-58; UNC lost 85-84

Projected starting lineups:

Virginia:

PG: Jontel Evans (6.2 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 3.7 apg)
SG: Sammy Zeglinski (8.5 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 2.8 apg)
SF: Joe Harris (12.7 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.7 apg)
PF: Mike Scott (17.0 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 1.4 apg)
F: Akil Mitchell (4.0 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 1.0 apg)

North Carolina:

PG: Kendall Marshall (6.8 ppg, 2.6 rpg, 9.8 apg)
SG: Reggie Bullock (8.4 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 1.0 apg)
SF: Harrison Barnes (17.7 ppg, 4.8 rpg, 1.0 apg)
PF: John Henson (14.2 ppg, 10.3 rpg, 1.5 apg)
C: Tyler Zeller (15.6 ppg, 9.7 rpg, 1.0 apg)

Regardless of what happened in our Wednesday game, UVA-Wake was always going to be overshadowed by UNC-Duke.  Then came the thrilling conclusion, in which Carolina was on the short end of the stick, and now it's possible UNC-Duke will overshadow this one, too.

At risk of introducing spoilers to the party here, I see one of three ways this game could go:

-- UNC is pissed off and takes it out on the next poor slob to show up on their court
-- UNC is still despondent and sleepwalks through this one, waking up only to learn of their first losing streak of the season
-- The first half consists of the latter possibility and the second half consists of the former, aided by Coach Roy losing his shit at halftime

Unfortunately, two of those three are bad.  Also unfortunately, the next two sections don't provide much cheer either.  So pin on your Eeyore tails and join me in a scotch-assisted explanation of the different ways the Tar Heels will probably beat hell out of us.

-- UVA on offense

Let's start with a little bit of good news: UNC's backcourt is paper-thin.  You already know Dexter Strickland is out for the year, and now P.J. Hairston will miss Saturday's game too.  That brings UNC all the way down to UVA depth levels; like us, they'll play six guys with a couple others maybe getting some spot duty.  Even worse, they're down to two regulars in the backcourt.  Two.  Point guard Kendall Marshall and backup-turned-starter Reggie Bullock.  Justin Watts is a little-used, back-end guard who'll be pressed into more duty, but if UVA keeps this close in the second half you probably won't see him until foul trouble demands it.

Of course, they still roll pretty deep in the frontcourt.  UNC has been killing fools all year with their bigs, especially if you count Harrison Barnes as a big, which I do because he's 6'8".  This is a team not unlike Florida State in the frontcourt.  John Henson is a block machine with over three per game.  With either Henson or Tyler Zeller guarding Mike Scott - probably both at the same time, often enough - it'll make for one of the best frontcourt battles of the year.  Scott was unconscious on Wednesday and has evolved into every coach's wet dream: a true, honest-to-Jebus, floor-stretching four who can make your seven-footers look silly far from the basket and maul your smaller guys closer to it.  Obviously, the jump shot will need to be falling again because Scott will almost certainly get the double-team of doom if he catches it close to the rim, and these guys are slightly better than Nikita Mescheriakov.**

With Carolina's size down low and depth issues up top, the way to win this game is going to have to be raining three-pointers.  That shot simply must fall.  I don't see us getting consistent looks indoors, so it's got to be downtown.  And the worst part is that with Barnes likely guarding Joe Harris, Joey Hoops probably won't get many chances to hoop.  Barnes has two inches on him and probably more in the arm-length department.  And Jontel Evans won't shoot, so you know what I'm getting at here.  Splash Sammy must make an appearance.  He's got to find a way to get some shots off over whoever's guarding him.  And those shots gotta go in.

Lemme check and see who's guarding him.  It'll be Reggie Bullock, probably and.... six foot seven.  Reggie Bullock is six foot seven.  There's a reason I told you to be ready for some real Eeyore stuff here.

Even so, we have to make it rain or we lose.  There's no good reason to like our chances inside.  Even Mike Scott can only do so much before the double, triple, and quadruple teams start causing him to miss a shot here and there.  Carolina happens to also be the best team in the country at keeping the opponent off the foul line (per KenPom's FTA/FGA metric) so it's much easier said than done to look at their thin lineup and think maybe we can get them in trouble that way.  UVA may be forced to go big and see what 6'5" Malcolm Brogdon can do, but whoever ends up in the game has got to be a shooting machine because UNC is simply too big to beat two points at a time.

**I found a new whipping boy!  Dude is turrible.  He's not nearly as much fun as Jeff Allen, but he's my new standard by which lousy basketball is judged.  I mean, did you see his wacky attempt at a reverse layup that ended up further from the basket than it started?

-- UVA on defense

That "big" thing is gonna hurt on offense, but it's really gonna hurt when the Heels have the ball.  You look back on the teams that have beaten UNC - top-25 types, all of them, in UNLV, Kentucky, FSU, and Duke - but the common thread is that they're all just as big as UNC.  Carolina is the fourth-tallest team in the country (another KenPom metric.)  UNLV is 30th, UK is 13th, FSU is 9th, and Duke is 3rd.  UVA is an extremely average 123rd, and that's taking into account the minutes that Assane Sene has played.  All of those teams were able to harass UNC's big three of Barnes, Zeller, and Henson into lousy shooting nights, except for Duke which won because as the #1 offensive team in the country, they were able to keep up the pace.

The pack-line, of course, can be a neutralizer of interior games, and this is exactly the kind of situation it was designed for.  There's a clear gap in physics here, because we're asking everyone on the team to guard bigger players.  Probably the only way to keep UNC's bigs off the scoreboard is to deny them the ball in the first place.  Once they actually get it, all is lost; the hard work has to be done early.

And make no mistake, it's all about down low, plus the floor-stretching abilities of Harrison Barnes.  He, Zeller, and Henson account for well over half of Carolina's scoring.  Relatively speaking, Kendall Marshall does very little scoring, but he's a fantastic facilitator with a sky-high assist rate of 43.4%.  Marshall vs. Evans on this end will be another big battle with a lot of implications.  Reggie Bullock is a threat from deep, and can't be ignored, but inside the pack line is where the game will be won, or more likely, lost.  One interesting possibility: Sammy Zeglinski is the superior defender to Joe Harris (lost in the rest of the game story was the outstanding work that Sammy did on Wake's C.J. Harris - Harris averages 17.5 points, and on Wednesday he was 2 for 7.)  Size ain't no thing here since Bullock and Barnes are damn near the same height, so it might make sense to make a switch and put the better defender, however short, on Barnes, and have Harris shadow Bullock instead.

Any way you look at it though, any twist or wrinkle you might want to throw in: yikes.  UNC likes to run, run, run, and is big, big, big, and this is simply put the toughest test of the year, no foolies.  Duke was Duke, but we had Sene back then.  Bad times may be afoot.

-- Outlook

How do you win this game?  On offense, run the shot clock to four seconds and bury a three.  Every trip.  On defense, frustrate Carolina with perfect entry pass denial for thirty-three seconds and snatch the rebound off the hopefully hurried shot.  Every trip.  This is such a huge contrast of styles, with the Heels being one of the fastest-paced teams in the land, and UVA playing Tonyball.  UNC being comprised of giant athletic galoots and UVA being comprised of mostly smallish scrappers.  It's not as if there's no hope; we did, after all, come within three of the similarly-built Florida State.  But you'll recall that except for a three-minute stretch where Florida State replaced their defenders with traffic cones, their length, size, and athleticism were just killing us.  UNC is no different, and likely to be out for blood after what went down on Wednesday.

-- Final score: UNC 72, UVA 59

acc baseball preview, part 2

We continue with the next four teams on the list.

GEORGIA TECH

Last season:

Record: 42-21 (22-8)
ACC tournament: 3rd seed; 1-2
NCAA tournament: regional host; 2-2, eliminated in regional

2012 schedule: skips Maryland
Names to know: 1B Jake Davies, RHP Buck Farmer, DH Daniel Palka, CF Kyle Wren

Georgia Tech is one of those reload-don't-rebuild teams, and always one of the best in the conference.  But they don't have much reloading to do this year, with seven position players returning.  And that's a tough lineup.  It was one of the most consistent in the league last year - rarely did the Jackets shuffle anyone in or out or give many days off, not even at catcher where Zane Evans caught all thirty ACC games.  And nobody in that lineup hit below .270, either.

Tech is a power-hitting team, and their top slugger - DH Daniel Palka - returns this year.  Palka hit .297-10-52 last year, but isn't much good in the field.  Doesn't matter, because Jake Davies hit .347 and fielded .996 at first base with just two errors all season.  Also a great fielder: CF Kyle Wren, who had only one error, and bats leadoff for the Jackets (.340 BA.)  We could really just go up and down this lineup and not find anything resembling a weakness.  The only thing Tech has to replace is the left side of the infield, but at shortstop, they'll just move over last year's second baseman, Mott Hyde.

OK, well, they also have to replace 2/3 of the weekend rotation.  The Friday starter is Buck Farmer, who moves up from Sundays last year.  Farmer was 11-3, 2.91 last year with 106 Ks, so they're pretty well set.  Tech has a little competition going for the other three starter spots, but we'll call it right now: DeAndre Smelter will end up with one of them.  Smelter was a 14th-round pick out of high school and is a versatile athlete, but is probably more valuable on the mound than with a bat; he gave up one run in 17.1 innings last year.  If he cuts down on the walks (11 against 8 strikeouts) he'll be pretty fearsome.  Out of the bullpen, GT does have maybe the conference's best closer in Luke Bard.

Tech has an interesting test to start the season; they'll have a pair of games against Kent State, one of the better northern teams in the country.  You might remember Kent State from "holy shit who beat Texas?" in last year's NCAAs, or else you might vaguely remember that that was Tyler Skulina's destination after Skulina thrilled UVA fans by not signing with MLB out of the draft and then bolting out of town barely two months later.  GT also drew the "skips Maryland" straw in the 2012-2013 rotation, which means they probably have the toughest schedule in the whole ACC.  Even so, they're a favorite to contend for the ACC title and have a terrific shot at hosting a regional again.

MARYLAND

Last season:

Record: 21-35 (5-25)
ACC tournament: No
NCAA tournament: Ha

2012 schedule: skips Georgia Tech
Names to know: RF Charlie White, RHP Brett Harman, 2B Ryan Holland, INF Tomo Delp

The Terps are this year's exhibit of that age-old conundrum: A lot of players return, but is that a good thing when you suck?  Maryland was 5-25 in-conference in both of Erik Bakich's first two seasons.  Last year they were badly hurt by the loss of ace pitcher Brett Harman to hip surgery and had to shuffle the rotation every other week.

Maryland boasts of having a great number of senior starting pitchers, and that sounds nice til you remember how things work in college baseball: nine out of ten players who are any good leave after their junior year.  Still, the staff ERA did improve in 2011, from 7.19 to 5.24.  Whether they can continue that or if it was an artifact of the new clankbats remains to be seen.  Evidence from the K/BB columns points toward the latter, with the best K/BB ratio among Maryland's starting pitchers from last year belonging to Brady Kirkpatrick at about 1.6.

At the plate (and on the mound, too, really) Maryland is almost all seniors (holdovers from before the Bakich era began) and sophomores who jumped right in as freshmen last year.  That suggests potential for improvement, but there's a lot of room for it.  They're led by sophomore Charlie White, the only .300-hitting regular last season.  White has zero power, but Maryland is more of a base-stealing, station-to-station team - there's little power in the whole lineup.  2B Ryan Holland was probably the best overall hitter at .284-3-30, and yes, 30 was enough to lead the team.  The real shame is that corner infielder Tomo Delp hit his way right out of the lineup.  He's not a "name to know" because he's any good at hitting; quite the contrary, his .178 batting average got him removed from even this anemic batting order.  It's just that Delp is the guy with the habit of whipping his bat around over his head before every pitch like a little aluminum helicopter.

I think, because of how many freshmen started for Maryland last year and because of Harman's return to the rotation, that they're due for a bump upwards from that five-win total.  And they don't play GT, which is a help.  But the Terps are still miles away from the ACC tournament, and one certainly hopes that our tradition of plating 20+ runs on them in one of the weekend games will continue.

MIAMI

Last season:

Record: 38-23 (19-10)
ACC tournament: 5th seed; 2-1
NCAA tournament: regional 2 seed; 2-2, eliminated in regional

2012 schedule: skips NC State
Names to know: IF Rony Rodriguez, LHP Brian Radziewski, RHP Eric Whaley, RHP E.J. Encinosa

Miami and UVA tied for third in the division in the preseason media poll, because the media couldn't decide whether it was better to lose most of your best hitters and all of your pitchers, or most of your best hitters and none of your pitchers.

Actually, it's a tribute to the leftover talent here in Charlottesville that Miami wasn't voted ahead outright, because the pitching staff they bring back is pretty excellent.  It should be a contender for best in the conference.  Freshman Bryan Radziewski turned out to be last year's staff ace, pitching every Friday for the Canes.  Right behind him were sophomores Eric Whaley and E.J. Encinosa, and the only thing that kept the whole trio from making 10 ACC starts each was a rainout.  When you go from Friday to Sunday against Miami you go up the scale; Radziewski is a diminutive southpaw and a location artist, while Sunday hurler Encinosa is a huge, linebacker-sized right-hander.

As mentioned, most of Miami's best hitters have moved on, but they still have big-time slugger Rony Rodriguez (.308-13-44 in 2011.)  Rodriguez's .596 SA was good for second in the ACC.  Miami actually does return most of their infield (if not all of it - it depends on who you consider the regular infield as there was plenty of rotation last year) but mostly it's a crew of steady hitters who field badly.  They do get some help at catcher, too; last year there was a platoon and little to no offensive production from either candidate (and of course one of them was terrible at throwing out basestealers and the other was a horrible hitter, which is always how it seems to go.)  But the Canes got a transfer in the form of Peter O'Brien from Bethune-Cookman, who'll provide a year of upgrade in both departments.

Miami has higher standards than what they showed last year, but in such a tough Coastal Division they'll have a difficult time progressing beyond that 2 seed.  That starting rotation will give them a chance to win every conference game, though, and is their best hope for hosting a regional this season.  As with the reloading Hoos, call it a 50/50 shot at that particular goal.

NORTH CAROLINA

Last season:

Record: 51-16 (20-10)
ACC tournament: 4th seed; 1-2
NCAA tournament: super-regional host; College World Series; 6-2, T-5th

2012 schedule: skips Florida State
Names to know: 3B Colin Moran, LHP Kent Emanuel, C Jacob Stallings, INF Tommy Coyle

In looking at UNC's stats from last year, there's not much that's especially outstanding (except that you'd have to admit that ace pitcher Patrick Johnson would have some pretty incredible numbers if we weren't used to having our minds blown out by what Danny Hultzen would produce.)  The Heels just kept winning, is all.

They did have some pretty terrific freshmen - now sophomores - to help them bounce back from a disappointing 2010 in which they failed to make the ACC tournament.  Colin Moran at third base was the team's best hitter by far, batting .335-9-71 and leading the team in every conceivable hitting category but triples.  Moran happens to be the nephew of MLBer B.J. Surhoff.  Tommy Coyle, another freshman, was the next guy on the list, hitting .311; he's also flexible enough to play either middle infield position.  UNC will also return catcher Jacob Stallings, a very good hitter who cut down 32 of 76 basestealers last year.

There's also Kent Emanuel, a southpaw who'll be this year's Friday starter.  He pitched Saturdays last year but could've pitched Fridays for most teams in the conference.  Emanuel only lost one game last year and had a sterling 2.33 ERA.  And when it comes to returning players.....that's about it.  Those four right there, plus left fielder Chaz Frank, a solid but unspectacular player, and Sunday starter Chris Munnelly.

UNC is the favorite to win the conference largely on the strength of those four.  They've got to plug holes everywhere else.  Munnelly is the likely Saturday guy this year, but he was decent-not-great in 2011, and as for Sunday, who knows?  UNC has a deep bullpen to draw from, but the non-Emanuel portion of the pitching rotation is the biggest obstacle to repeating last year's success.  Coyle will probably move to shortstop after playing second most of last year, but that still requires replacing a middle infielder, and they'll break in a new center fielder, too.  If UNC solves the starting rotation, they'll be as dangerous as any team in the conference and likely live up to the preseason expectations; if not, they could find the division crown stolen by any of three tough competitors.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

game preview: Wake Forest


Date/Time: Wednesday, February 8; 7:30

TV: ACC Net., ESPN3

Record against the Deacons: 59-69

Last matchup: Wake 76, UVA 71; 1/29/11; Winston-Salem

Last game: FSU 58, UVA 55 (2/4); NCSt. 87, Wake 76 (1/4)

Opposing blogs: Blogger So Dear

KenPom breakdown:

Tempo:
UVA: 60.2 (#341)
Wake: 67.6 (#124)

Offense:
UVA: 105.9 (#84)
Wake: 98.9 (#194)

Defense:
UVA: 86.3 (#9)
Wake: 102.2 (#199)

Pythag:
UVA: .8914 (#19)
Wake: .4166 (#197)

Common opponents:

Virginia Tech: UVA lost 47-45; Wake won, 58-55
NC State: UVA won, 61-60; Wake lost, 76-40 and 87-76
Duke: UVA lost, 61-58; Wake lost, 91-73
Boston College: UVA won, 66-49; Wake won 71-56
Florida State: UVA lost, 58-55; Wake lost 75-52
Clemson: UVA won, 65-61; Wake lost 71-60

Projected starting lineups:

Virginia:

PG: Jontel Evans (6.0 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 3.7 apg)
SG: Sammy Zeglinski (8.7 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 2.7 apg)
SF: Joe Harris (12.7 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.6 apg)
PF: Mike Scott (17.0 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 1.4 apg)
F: Akil Mitchell (3.8 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 0.8 apg)

Wake Forest:

PG: Tony Chennault (10.0 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 3.0 apg)
SG: C.J. Harris (17.5 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 2.4 apg)
SF: Travis McKie (15.8 ppg, 7.2 rpg, 1.1 apg)
PF: Nikita Mescheriakov (7.3 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 1.4 apg)
C: Ty Walker (5.3 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 0.7 apg)

Attention Virginia fans.  It has come to my attention that, despite the fact that we are having a season in which the media has made liberal use of the phrase "not since Ralph Sampson," many of you are dissatisfied.  This manifests itself in repeated calls to replace Sammy Zeglinski in the starting lineup with Malcolm Brogdon.  There's some pretty twisted logic in demanding that a .315 three-point shooter replace a .366 three-point shooter because the latter is not good enough at shooting threes, but I will not even mention that.  Instead, I will point out two important things: we are eighteen and four, and two of those losses came by three points each to two of the best teams in the conference country.  ON THE ROAD.  And you want to pull a fifth-year senior for a freshman. #OnlyVirginiaFans

Well, we're kinda crazy like that.  I've always said UVA fans are far too willing to sacrifice present-day success for the possibility of future success.  That's how you get people demanding we play Mike Rocco over Marc Verica and then demanding Rocco be sat down for David Watford.  This is not the time and place to be thinking about the future of basketball; there is business to take care of now, and tonight, business is named Wake Forest.

-- UVA on offense

Let me start by giving you a partial list of teams that have scored more than a point per possession so far on Wake Forest: NC Central, High Point, UNC-Wilmington.  All outside the KenPom top 200.  NC State also managed this twice, most recently by a lot with 87 points in 66 possessions, a whopping 1.3 per.  Let's hope the ability to score like that isn't limited only to teams from North Carolina.

Jeff Bzdelik is well-known for running a match-up zone defense, in which defenders will guard their man closely on the ball-side and stick to their zone on the weak-side.  They're not assigned a specific man; rather, bigs will guard whoever comes down low and guards will defend the perimeter.  Wake has a seven-footer in the game at all times in either Ty Walker or Carson Desrosiers, and 6'10" Daniel Green gets spot minutes in the rotation; this philosophy of sticking to the post combined with having the necessary bigs means that Wake is actually one of the best shot-blocking teams in the country.  Walker and Desrosiers can be expected to reject a few layup attempts.

However, when it comes to forcing turnovers and getting rebounds, Wake does a poor job.  Even Sammy Zeglinski, who has to go to tiptoes to reach six feet, is nearly as good a defensive rebounder as Wake's forwards like Nikita Mescheriakov.  (Not that that's a matchup thing - it's just for comparison's sake.)

Any time UVA has trouble scoring, it's usually because of long, tall, athletic guards.  FSU's gave us a thousand fits.  Wake's are only average-sized, so hopefully the shots will be there - we just have to you-know-what.**  The biggest perimeter challenge will probably be Travis McKie, a 6'7" forward with a bigger wingspan and the capability of harassing Joe Harris.  When Wake goes straight man-to-man, whichever seven-footer is in the game will have the Mike Scott watch because I cannot imagine Mescheriakov having even the slightest ability to slow him down.  Scott will abuse that guy.  Mescheriakov has fouled out of two games this year and collected four in six more.  Even though the match-up zone may end up denying a few dribble-drives that Brogdon or Evans might feel like taking, if Wake goes to it heavily then placing Scott on Mescheriakov's side of the zone has the potential for many points, many fouls, and possibly also opening up Akil Mitchell or a three-point shot as the defenders rush to help.

Worst defense in the conference?  Yes.  There are some strengths - mainly the shot-blocking by their centers - but overall it's pretty bad.  Say what you will about our occasionally sputtering offense, but as we saw against GT and in the final ten minutes of the BC game, eventually UVA will throw down and play like an elite offense against lousy defenses.  Despite not having Assane Sene to keep the seven-footers honest, I think we get another 20-point effort from Mike Scott.

**In case you don't: make them.  We have to make them.

--  UVA on defense

Any discussion of Wake Forest's offense starts with C.J. Harris, and progresses quickly to Travis McKie.  Both are versatile, dangerous players, with talent that's hidden by their team's 2-7 conference record.  Harris in particular is nasty good.  His shooting is outstanding: .523 from two and .456 from three, and an excellent free throw shooter besides.  He's not the point guard, but he has almost as many assists as Tony Chennault.  Just a ton of ways he can hurt you.  Zeglinski will have his hands full.

McKie is another problem, albeit a somewhat less consistent one.  While Harris has not yet scored in single-digits this season, McKie can be limited.  He averages 15.8, but has been held to single digits three times out of nine in the conference schedule, including 2 points against NC State and 3 against FSU.  However, when he's on, like Harris he can hit a shot anywhere from 1 to 20 feet from the basket.

After that.....well, that's why Wake isn't much good.  Tony Chennault is a scoring point guard, but largely a volume scorer, taking the most shots on the team after McKie.  The fact that Chennault shoots more than Harris is probably a good reason why Wake stinks.  His 1.37/1 A/T ratio isn't much good, either.

And nobody else is much worth mentioning.  Mescheriakov in particular is horrible.  He takes a lot of threes that never go in - it seems like we have a lot of those players in the league this year - and has a miserable .346 shooting percentage.  Not good for a guy who's supposedly a post player.  The bigs, Walker and Desrosiers, are mainly screeners and don't shoot much.

The long and short of it is that Wake's offense is extremely guard-heavy.  Harris and McKie are excellent, Chennault is OK, and Chase Fischer is a reasonably capable off-the-bench three-point specialist.  Is this good for UVA?  It is if the pack-line defense is humming along like it should, with extreme denial of the driving lanes and getting quickly into a shooter's face.  It's been said if you stop Harris and McKie you stop Wake; truthfully, all you need to do is stop McKie.  Harris is likely to get his, but you can blow Wake out by turning them into a one-man show.  Even if you stop neither, you're still fairly likely to win.

-- Outlook

Hopefully this is an enjoyable game, because it's sandwiched in between two of the nastiest on the schedule.  Next up is UNC in Chapel Hill.  UVA could struggle if the perimeter shots aren't falling and Harris and McKie run wild, but it's at least as likely that we win by 20.  Have to take care of business in this game, because it's the last really easy one left.

-- Final score: UVA 68, Wake 51

acc baseball preview, part 1

The weekend of the 17th-19th is a big deal.  On Friday the 17th, the baseball team kicks off its season in Myrtle Beach with a tourneyish game against Boston College.  (That is the team we skip these next two seasons in the ACC schedule, and no, this game won't count in the ACC standings.)  The following day, lacrosse is underway with the now-traditional season opener against Drexel.  And the lady swimmers will be in the midst of the ACC championships - in which, again, they are favored.  (Because I was a high school swimmer, every spring you're subjected to a few posts dedicated to swimming and diving.)

So the next two weeks will be a spring bonanza of sorts, as we move into that season of athletics.  We're very fortunate at UVA - whereas other blogs often divide the year into "football season" and "not football season" we have no shortage of excitement.

We'll fire up this spring bonanza with Part 1 of the ACC baseball preview.  You won't have to sit through a post on each team - this'll be a three-parter.

BOSTON COLLEGE

Last season:

Record: 17-33 (7-22)
ACC tournament: No
NCAA tournament: No

2012 schedule: Skips Virginia
Names to know: RF Matt McGovern, OF/P Andrew Lawrence, SS Anthony Melchionda

In even-numbered years, the team you skip on the schedule changes.  (Dunno how that'll work when Pittsburgh joins, but that's the way it is now.)  UVA missed out on two years of crappy-ass Wake Forest and now, just as Wake is improving, we'll now miss out on two years of crappy-ass Boston College.

Like most northern baseball teams, BC isn't any good.  Last year's pitching was especially disastrous.  The Eagles shuffled their rotation like few teams ever do; out of 10 ACC weekends, only two of them had the same pitching permutation.  This year there may be a ray of hope.  Do-everything senior Andrew Lawrence - who hails from St. Christopher's in Richmond, same as UVA's freshman DE Thompson Brown - returns, as does sophomore righty Eric Stevens.  Stevens pitched out of the pen mostly in 2011, but likely moves to the rotation this year.  BC's team ERA was a miserable 5.63 last year, but Lawrence and Stevens pitched in the 4's and allowed a respectable .250ish BA.  So there's hope for improvement here.

The Eagles must replace most of their (light-hitting) infield, but will have a veteran outfield.  Anthony Melchionda manned the hot corner last year but as a team captain and returning veteran, will play shortstop in 2011.  The rest of the infield, though, is left to new starters.  Lawrence - the team's best power hitter - will play a corner outfield position when he's not pitching, and the Eagles will lean heavily on Matt McGovern, the team's leading hitter last year at .374.  McGovern doesn't bring much power, but he's a good fielder and - since Melchionda was the only other .300 hitter on the roster - an irreplaceable bat.  Tom Bourdon is the returning center fielder, a .289 hitter in 2011, and leading base-stealer (although BC rarely attempts to steal), and Marc Perdios started quite a few games last year in left and provides decent depth.

The schedule does BC no favors, as conference favorite UNC replaces UVA on the schedule.  Chances are that BC will battle it out with Maryland, again, to stay out of the Atlantic cellar.  I think they'll improve by a game or two, but there's no reason to expect them to qualify for the 8-team ACC tournament.

CLEMSON

Last season:

Record: 43-20 (17-13)
ACC tournament: 6th seed; 2-1
NCAA tournament: regional host; 2-2 (lost in regional)

2012 schedule: skips Virginia Tech
Names to know: 1B Richie Shaffer, C Phil Pohl, RHP Kevin Brady, RHP Scott Firth, RHP Jonathan Meyer

Like UVA, Clemson got slammed by the draft and departures; most of last year's lineup is gone.  Nevertheless, they're the media's favorite in the Atlantic Division, probably due to a pitching staff that's likely to be the envy of most of the conference.

That staff is led by Kevin Brady, a flamethrower who missed a lot of last season, but was more than effective when on the mound.  He allowed just a .218 BA, but more impressively, struck out 33 and walked only one hitter.  Scott Firth and Jonathan Meyer will likely be the other weekend starters, and all three of these guys had opponent BAs under .230 and ERAs under 4.  The Clemson rotation has a good chance to be the best in the conference, without a weakness on any weekend day.  The one shortfall is a dearth of lefthanders, but it probably won't matter.

Discussions of the Clemson offense begin with Richie Shaffer, who Baseball America calls the best raw-power hitter in the conference.  With 13 home runs last year, it's easy to see why.  Shaffer slugged .577 last year and drew 44 walks, most on the team; the result was an OPS of 1.015.  Clemson also has good quality depth behind the plate, returning both Phil Pohl and Spencer Kieboom, who will share catching duties.  Pohl is a regular and will play first or DH when not catching.  However, other than shortstop Jason Stolz, that's it for returners.  Clemson hit so well last year that they'll be very hard-pressed to match that kind of lineup, which might put a crimp in their "favorite" label.

The schedule doesn't help either, trading off Coastal bottom-feeder VT for Coastal contender Miami.  But the Tigers do get the other two division contenders - NC State (kinda) and FSU - at home.  Truthfully, the Atlantic is a two-team race, and Clemson's pitching staff will keep them in contention all season.

DUKE

Last season:

Record: 26-30 (7-23)
ACC tournament: No
NCAA tournament: No

2012 schedule: skips Wake Forest
Names to know: RHP Marcus Stroman, CF Will Piwnica-Worms, C Jeff Kremer

Last year, despite the fact that they historically suck, I pegged Duke as a surprise ACC tournament team.  They repaid my faith by historically sucking.  But almost the whole team returns, so....maybe this year?

They've got Marcus Stroman, for starters.  Stroman is BA's top 2012 draft prospect in the conference.  He played some infield last year, but his pitching arm is what makes him his money.  Stroman struck out 90 batters last year and boasted a 2.80 ERA.  He's the kind of guy that gives his team a chance no matter who they're playing.  I wouldn't even be surprised if Duke pulls the offset-your-rotation strategy and pitches their ace on Sundays to try and steal wins against their opponents' #3 guy.  But Duke's Saturday guy is probably going to be Chase Bebout, who's not that bad either.

Duke's center fielder might be a pedestrian .264 hitter, but he stole 21 bases in 23 attempts last year and has far and away the best name in all of ACC baseball: Will Piwnica-Worms.  At catcher, there is Jeff Kremer, who led the Blue Devils with a .347 average.  However, Duke's hitting isn't ACC-level stuff overall.  As a team they slugged just .359 last year, and overall they don't hit for a high enough average to overcome their general lack of power.  The team home run leader was 1B/OF Chris Marconcini with just four.  UVA is kind of like that in the power department, but hits for a much better average, and that's the difference between going to the NCAA tournament and not even going to the ACC one.  (That and way better pitching.)  Duke might have a shot at the ACC tourney if they played in the Anemic Division, where only FSU and Clemson pose a major threat, but they're stuck in the Coastal, which means either they or Tech will be in the basement.

FLORIDA STATE

Last season:

Record: 46-19 (19-11)
ACC tournament: 2nd seed; 2-2 (lost championship game)
NCAA tournament: super-regional host; 4-2 (lost in super-regional)

2012 schedule: skips North Carolina
Names to know: RF James Ramsey, 1B Jayce Boyd, 2B Devon Travis

It really is stupid that we spent the last two years not playing one of the worst teams in the league and will spend the next two years also not playing one of the worst teams in the league, and meanwhile FSU's skip buddy was Georgia Tech and now will be North Carolina.  Clemson can't be pleased about that, either.

Speaking of Clemson, though, here we have their major opposition in the Anemic Division, and their opposite as well.  FSU won't have any trouble finding hitters to send to the plate, but they spent all of last year having one ace pitcher and hunting for Saturday and Sunday guys to back him up.  Now that ace (Sean Gilmartin) is gone and the Noles have to piece together a rotation from a lot of misfit parts.  Hunter Scantling is probably the first place to look, and there are other possibilities - Gary Merians, who allowed a .292 BA; lefty Brian Busch, who along with Scott Sitz pitched their way right out of the rotation in the first place; Robert Benincasa (no relation to UVA laxer Ryan), who has decent numbers but a slight penchant for pitching taterballs.

But the lineup looks like the usual Florida State murderer's row.  Start with all-purpose hitter James Ramsey, who led the team in just about everything and put together a .364-10-67 stat line.  1B Jayce Boyd also drove in 60 runs, and Devon Travis was a .329 hitter as well (though a bit of a butcher in the field.)  This is, even in the new dead-bat era, a team that lives on the home run.  In 2011 there was a weird cliff on the FSU stat sheet where the top five hitters hit .321 or better and the sixth guy hit .264, but there was no such drop-off in the slugging department.

It's safe to assume FSU will find hitters to replace those they lost, and those that remain make up an excellent core.  And not playing UNC is a big advantage.  But the pitching - eeesh.  It's problematic.  It's why FSU isn't being picked by anyone to win the division.

Monday, February 6, 2012

2013 early look

I'll toss in some bastyball notes at the end, but I just don't have enough of that circling inside my head to make a full post out of.  So today, we'll take the first look at the makeup of the recruiting class of 2013.

The first thing you need to know is that it'll be small (relatively speaking) because the upcoming senior class is small.  By the time we get to the fall, there'll be no more than 12 players in it.  And the class behind them - this past year's sophomores - doesn't have a lot of candidates to be uninvited for their fifth year.  That's as it stands now, anyway, but I don't see more than three right now.

As always, you have to factor in some attrition, but this 2013 class isn't going to push the limits of the rulebook the way the previous two have.  What's the target number?  I would say 16-19. No more than 20 or 21 players at the most, and that would really require some major attrition.  The first one is already on board - the recruiting sites aren't officially counting Trent Corney among the commitments just yet, but I am.

So let's see what the major needs are.....

QUARTERBACK

This is not a need, but we'll probably take one anyway.  The instate crop is too good to ignore.  You probably know the names right now, because you've been hearing them for a while - Ryan Burns of Stone Bridge (no relation to Rob who came from the same school), Bucky Hodges of Salem, and Christian Hackenberg from Fork Union.  Those three, plus Good Counsel's Brendan Marshall, comprise the offer list at the moment.

After declaring we were done recruiting quarterbacks when Matt Johns committed and then ending up with green eggs and ham on my face when Greyson Lambert did too, I shouldn't be ruling out surprises.  But the depth chart is pretty full now, so it wouldn't be surprising if we whiff on quarterbacks entirely and it would be hugely surprising if we took two again.  Especially in a smaller class.  I'll put myself back on that limb and say we won't take two.  But I think we'll take one, and right now I'd call it a coin flip as to whether we get one of those four.

RUNNING BACK

This is a need, however, and UVA will look for two, if not three.  (Well, maybe not three.  But you never know.)  Taquan Mizzell seems likely-ish to pick UVA, hailing from pipeline school Bayside and all.  In an ideal world, the other back we get will be a tough, pile-moving, Big Ten-style big back.  The coaches tried hard for one in 2012 and didn't get one.  The deal is that Kye Morgan probably redshirts and puts a full year in between him and the trio of Parks, Richardson, and Shepherd, which means Morgan would lead the replacement charge when those three graduate.  But not getting two backs in this class would mean way too thin of a lineup at that point.  Two is the bare minimum.

There's also a need for an H-back type of player.  Corney is being offered without much regard (yet) to slotting, and that could be him, but he's probably going to outgrow it if he hasn't already.  The coaches pursued Nathan Staub and didn't get him, so they'll probably try again with a similar type of player to fill the fullback/H-back role.  Otherwise that position will have to be manned from within, because Zach Swanson is the only listed scholarship player right now.

WIDE RECEIVER/TIGHT END

We took bloody six this year.  I think there's sort of a fair chance we won't take that many again.  And there is not one rising senior in the WR corps, so this is completely not a need.  Zack Jones is Perry's brother and will probably end up at UVA playing receiver.  And you almost never see recruiting classes with just one wideout, so another one is probably in the cards.  And the coaches seem to have this thing for recruiting generically athletic instate players and letting the slotting chips fall where they may, so that might bring us to three.  If we take more than that it's gross negligence.

Besides that, I expect one tight end to show up, since we graduate two.  That guy might be called a defensive end or something originally, like Max Valles.

OFFENSIVE LINE

Three linemen is a working, basic minimum regardless of class size.  If you could only bring in three players, they'd probably be offensive linemen.  The class will probably tilt toward tackles a little bit since three of the four players in the 2012 class look like interior types.  But the conveyor belt is humming along nicely and O-line looks like a strength for the foreseeable future.  With only two scholarship players graduating after this season (Oday Aboushi and Matt Mihalik, the latter being a fourth-year junior and a possibility for a non-invite) I don't think the coaches will take four scholarship linemen.  They've done a good job of filling the program with talent in this department and now have the luxury of being very choosy.

DEFENSIVE LINE

Likewise.  If 2012 was the year of going crazy on WRs, 2011 was the year of DEs.  Only two scholarship linemen will graduate after this coming fall - there were three, but Connor McCartin and his medical scholarship are counting as attrition to help make room for the 2012 class.

Even though Tyrell Chavis probably ends up in the 2013 class, another DT is a need.  The 2012 class only has Chavis and some defensive ends that might end up tackles; a true one-tech or zero-tech nose tackle is something we ought to have more of.  Aside from that, you probably take two defensive ends and call it a day.  Again: we can be picky here.

LINEBACKER

This is where we'll take the biggest hit after the season; one-third of the graduating seniors are linebackers.  Four graduating players at one position in a class of 12 is a lot.  Might we take four to replace them?  It shouldn't come as a surprise if we do.  Linebackers are nice in that they sometimes have the flexibility to become H-backs, which, hey, that's a big need remember, so a distinct possibility is recruiting a guy whom all the services list as a linebacker, and telling him he's a fullback all the way.  Or else recruiting all of them as linebackers with the idea of converting one of them later.  (People still half-expect D.J. Hill to make that switch, after all.)  Add all this up and expect UVA to take quite a few of these guys.  All flavors of linebacker are on the table.

DEFENSIVE BACKS

Annnnnnnd....this is where I throw up my hands in defeat.  You'd think, having taken a busload of safety-types in 2011 and another busload of cornerback-types in 2012, we might back off a little.  Not so; in fact, we're already in decent shape for more cornerbacks.

This past season, the coaches broke up the logjam a little in the freshman ranks of defensive ends and safeties by playing Thompson Brown, Anthony Harris, and Kameron Mack.  People complain about burned redshirts and wotnot all the damn time, but this was smart from a roster-management standpoint, because it's terrible to have one guy in one class and five in the next.  So I expect something similar to happen with that wad of cornerbacks, helping to clear things up a little.  For 2013, we'll probably need three DBs, evenly split between safeties and corners.  This almost definitely means we'll take one guy who is simply called "defensive back" with no definite slot at corner or safety.  This is what coaches do to purposely drive bloggers crazy.

So, the final breakdown?  Looks like this:

QB: 1
RB: 2
WR: 2
TE: 1
OL: 3
DL: 4
LB: 4
DB: 3

That adds up to 20, for the math uninclined.  Obviously, because this stuff depends on the whims of 17-year-olds, each of those numbers is +/-1, depending on how those whims turn out.  I think there'll be a little more attrition than normal in the next 18 months, because of how big Mike London's first two classes turned out to be.  Call it a lesson learned from Tony Bennett's heralded six-man class that has all of two players left in it.

If you're wondering whether you should believe these numbers or not, take a look at last year's post at this time and ask yourself if I nailed it or not.  I call myself out for being wrong often enough, so I think I'm entitled to point out that we did, in fact, take three linebackers, one (eventual) tight end, and four of each type of lineman, as predicted.  On the other hand, I might have said something along the lines of "two wide receivers" and in fact I was off by four.  (But only three if one gets moved to defense, which would fulfill the prediction of six DBs that I made.)  I'm also taking credit for the 2 RBs thing, because it's not like we didn't try.  But I also predicted "no quarterbacks," so, oops.

Anyway, there you are.  Some other miscellaneous trends to watch for:

- I don't think we'll be as heavy on the camp commitments as we have been.  Coaches typically use the camps as ways to identify players they haven't evaluated much yet, and several offers usually go out on the spot.  But camp commitments also tend to be the low-star, lightly-recruited types.  Since we don't need to - and can't - pack the bus to the gills this year, as we have in previous years, look for the coaches to be a little more cautious in extending camp offers.

- Also look for the coaches to look farther south for some of these recruits.  In 2011 they re-established the home base: only three recruits came from outside the borders of Maryland and Virginia and one of them had committed to Al Groh.  (That was Adrian Gamble.)  In 2012, that number rose to 10, with the coaches working the northeast hard: two commits each from old stomping grounds in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and two from places more well-known for lacrosse recruits than football ones.  But the other state they worked on?  Georgia.  Al Groh's staff used to work the northern end of things very hard, particularly New Jersey, and he drew talent from New York and some from the Midwest as well.  Other than North Carolina, Groh went south only very sporadically.  London, however, seems to be leaving the Midwest alone for the most part, and working on Georgia as one of UVA's primary talent mines.  And to a lesser extent, Texas.  And to a lesser extent than that, Florida.  London appears to have identified Georgia as a point of emphasis, perhaps even more so than North Carolina.

****************************************************

In the world of round orange balls going through circular hoops, the ACC appears to be settling into a hierarchy of sorts:

- At the top is FSU, Duke, and UNC, in some order.
- The next layer consists of UVA, NC State, and Miami - propitious for us, because we beat them both and won't play them again, which'll come in handy should tiebreakers be necessary.
- Then you have the three children playing with loaded guns.  They look harmless and innocent, but sooner or later that thing is going off and someone's getting hurt.  These are Maryland, Clemson, and Tech.  None will play in anything resembling a postseason tournament, but all of them have inexplicably beaten someone really good (and/or given them a real scare) and will probably do so again at some point.
- Finally we have the bottom level of Wake, GT, and BC, none of which would hurt a fly.

The thing is to get to the fourth seed or better in the ACC.  Then you get the bye, of course, but the thing about not being the sixth seed (or worse) is that any second-round game would involve nobody scarier than yourself.  Sixth seed has to play the three seed.

That's not to say this isn't open to some change.  In the part of that hierarchy we care about, Duke is the most likely to shake things up.  This is because there's a growing body of evidence exposing them as a Sweet 16 team, but little more.  Thanks to Miami, they now have two losses, and they have yet to play either of their games against Carolina and also they have to visit FSU, which, like Miami, beat them on their suddenly not-that-scary home floor.  Some things would have to go surprisingly well for us (or the Pack or Canes) to pass Duke in the seeding, but it certainly looks as if they'll finish with no fewer than five losses and that's if they don't startle one of the loaded-gun kids or get tripped by NC State.

As for UVA, 5-3 at the halfway mark is not half bad if we want to get to 10-6, but there isn't much margin for error.  To get to that 10-win mark, we have to do one or more of three things:

- Upset UNC
- Revenge on FSU
- Take care of business with no stumbles in the five other games.

The two things I want out of this season are to play on Saturday of the ACC tournament and play in the second week of the NCAAs.  So really, the taking care of business thing is a goal regardless of whatever else.

Friday, February 3, 2012

game preview: Florida State; PLUS we got Pitt


Date/Time: Saturday, February 4; 1:00

TV: ACC Net., ESPN3

Record against the Noles: 17-19

Last matchup: FSU 63, UVA 56; 2/12/11; Tallahassee

Last game: UVA 65, Clemson 61 (1/31); FSU 68, GT 54 (2/1)

Opposing blogs: Tomahawk Nation

KenPom breakdown:

Tempo:
UVA: 59.9 (#341)
FSU: 68.1 (#99)

Offense:
UVA: 106.1 (#82)
FSU: 106.0 (#83)

Defense:
UVA: 86.5 (#8)
FSU: 85.5 (#5)

Pythag:
UVA: .8897 (#22)
FSU: .9009 (#18)

Common opponents:

Clemson: UVA won 65-61; FSU lost 79-59
Virginia Tech: UVA lost 47-45; FSU won 63-59
Duke: UVA lost 61-58; FSU won 76-73
Georgia Tech: UVA won 70-38; FSU won 68-54

Projected starting lineups:

Virginia:

PG: Jontel Evans (6.0 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 3.6 apg)
SG: Sammy Zeglinski (8.9 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 2.7 apg)
SF: Joe Harris (12.6 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.6 apg)
PF: Mike Scott (17.0 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 1.5 apg)
F: Akil Mitchell (4.0 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 0.8 apg)

Florida State:

PG: Luke Loucks (7.2 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 4.1 apg)
SG: Michael Snaer (14.1 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 1.8 apg)
G: Deividas Dulkys (7.7 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 1.2 apg)
PF: Bernard James (10.5 ppg, 8.8 rpg, 0.5 apg)
C: Xavier Gibson (7.7 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.4 apg)

The ACC made it's long-awaited announcement about future divisional alignments and scheduling and so forth, and that's big enough news I thought about skipping the game preview and rambling about that instead.  But this is as big a bastaball game as there is in the remainder of this season, so it'd be wrong to skip it.  So you get both.  Stupid blogger thoughts on the 14-team ACC are appended to the end of this preview.

As for the game itself, it's kinda big.  FSU and UVA are extremely similar in some respects (nearly identical KenPom numbers, heavy emphasis on defense) and polar opposites in others (tempo, defensive style) and are the two odds-on contenders for the right to be named Best Team In The ACC Other Than You-Know-Who.  Except that FSU has already beaten both You-Know-Whos.

Shameless plug before the fun stuff begins: since I'll be watching this game on ESPN3 and not on the tube, I'll be tweetering like a wild man all game; follow @MaizeNBlueWahoo for stupid blogger mini-thoughts.

-- UVA on offense

You know how UVA's defense works: don't let anybody inside, especially don't let anyone drive inside, and sag off on the perimeter.  FSU is more or less the opposite: they will hound and harass you on the perimeter and dare you to take advantage of their aggressiveness by driving.  Then they position a couple of athletic trees near the basket and get swatty.

Said trees are named Bernard James and Xavier Gibson.  It's not uncommon for teams to not have a real center, so they station a four there and hope it works out.  Florida State is the opposite; both these guys could legitimately be fives.  They have block percentages of 9.0 and 8.8 respectively, which means that when they're both on the court at the same time, the chances are better than 1-in-6 that your shot will meet an immovable object on the way to the net.  FSU is also excellent at defending the three-point shot, allowing just 28.3% shooting from there.  Just to up the degree of difficulty a little more, FSU is one of the biggest teams in the country, 9th in "effective height."  The guy who spells James and Gibson is seven-footer Jon Kreft, and their starting guards all stand 6'5".  And sixth man Okaro White comes off the bench at 6'8".

How do you score on a team like this?  I expect that, for starters, Mike Scott will have to deploy his 14-17 foot jump shot more often than usual.  James and Gibson will probably double him when he gets the ball in the post, and they're athletic guys but whether or not they're effective in chasing Scott to the perimeter (and no big guy this year has been, so far) it'll at least spread the floor a little.

I also think UVA will go into maximum slow-down mode.  I mean, even more so than usual.  FSU is a team that thrives on generating turnovers, and their size makes them really good at it.  The first twenty seconds of the shot clock will feature a little bit of jogging around, setting screens and playing catch on the perimeter, in full Tony Bennett war crime style.  Jontel and Sammy aren't big guys, and FSU has the athleticism advantage.  If Sammy or Joe Harris finds themselves with a nice open shot, fine, but I think we'll be content with taking our one shot late in the shot clock using one of our main scorers, instead of trying to force-create openings.

Deividas Dulkys is a better defender than Michael Snaer, so I think he'll draw Joe Harris; Dulkys has sneaky-good hands and is one of the Noles' top ball thieves.  But he's skinny and nowhere near as quick as Snaer.  If Harris is allowed to go one-on-one with his back to the basket, Dulkys may need help.  Harris typically is a perimeter player, of course, but if he gets the ball closer to the bucket, the Hoos might be able to work some inside-out magic, or else find Mike Scott a little bit more open than he should be.  At the point, Luke Loucks has a big size advantage on Evans - how many 6'5" point guards are there? - but he's got no quicks and Evans ought to win the matchup more often than not.

There may be a few second-chance points to be found as well; despite having such a big team, FSU is surprisingly average at defensive rebounding.  James is a bright spot for them here, but Gibson, for his size, isn't that great.

Any way you slice it, though, points will be hard to find.  This is a team that held UNC to 57 points, and in the Noles' second-fastest-paced game of the season, too.  (Somehow, Clemson scored 79 on them.  That is a mystery of the highest order and the Hoos' ray of hope.)  UVA will have to work for every point, and must stay disciplined; against a pressure defense like FSU's, it's easy to fall into the trap of rushing one's shot.

-- UVA on defense

How might this game be won?  Turnovers on this end.  A TO% of 24.1 makes FSU the #323 team in the country - turning it over one out of every four possessions.  Backup point guard Jeff Peterson is shockingly terrible with a whopping 37%.  Yes, if Peterson is on the court for eight possessions, he'll turn the ball over on three of them.  Five Seminoles average more than two turnovers per game.

And even playing at a much, much faster pace, FSU as a team averages fewer assists per game (12) than UVA (13.)  Why so few?  It has a lot to do with the number of transition baskets they get, off of all those turnovers they create on the other end.  It's also a function of having so many bigs - James, Gibson, White - involved in the offense.  But it's also a function of having black holes for offensive players.  Just about every Virginia player is better in the assist department than his Florida State counterpart, except for the point guards who are about even.  Once the ball hits the hands of a Seminole, it's likely to go toward the basket.  Or end up in enemy hands.

Despite the fact that James is the second-leading scorer, the truth is that the halfcourt offense runs through the guards mostly.  Or at least it should, as Gibson is actually the highest-usage player on the team, but one of the least efficient.  James is mostly a putback and transition guy.  Point guard Loucks doesn't look for his shot much, instead looking to feed Snaer and Dulkys, both of whom have very good shots.

When FSU's starters are in, that's when they'll have the advantage.  When they're not turning the ball over, they're pretty tough to stop.  UVA will have the upper hand when any of them are off the floor - Ian Miller has been a terrible shooter this year, and Peterson's turnover habit is already well-documented.  Jon Kreft is a nonfactor.  UVA's pack-line defense should be a good matchup against such a turnover-prone team, as it's something of a novelty and designed to let you make your own mistakes.  But FSU's size will be tough to defend and there'll be times there's nothing we can do.

-- Outlook

No doubt, FSU is a tournament team, and they have a terrific chance to earn the #1 seed in the ACC tourney.  Both of these teams are built in such a way as to give each other fits.  But unfortunately, FSU more so.  In order to win, UVA must force the Seminoles into a thousand turnovers and limit their own, because this defense will be maybe the toughest we see all year.  Including Carolina.  On the road, this is easier said than done.  It should be close, but the win will be just out of reach.

-- Final score: FSU 54, UVA 50

******************************************************

So, now the big-picture stuff.  ACC expansion and scheduling, as announced today.  Everybody say hi to Pittsburgh (HI PITTSBURGH!) as the Panthers will be the newest members of the Coastal Division when they eventually leave the Big East for better pastures.

There'll also be nine conference games on the football schedule, and the permanent crossover remains, so no changes there.  Pitt and Cuse are simply each other's buddies.  But the rest of the statement reads like this:
The format will consist of each team playing all six in its division each year, plus its primary crossover partner each year and two rotating opponents from the opposite division. This six-year cycle allows each team to play each divisional opponent and its primary crossover partner six times (three home and three away) while also playing each rotating crossover opponent two times (one home and one away).
I parse and parse and parse this statement and I can't for the life of me tell whether they're doing this right or not.  What do I mean?

- Wrong: The way they're doing it now.
- Right: The format proposed at the bottom of this post.

Just replace the Pitt helmet with a Syracuse one.  Both ways would fulfill "playing each rotating crossover opponent two times in six years" but my way means three calendar years between games against a particular opponent.  The current way - a home game directly followed by an away game directly followed by a huge gap - would mean five calendar years.  Let me make this perfectly clear: if a normal student attends UVA, and during his time there, there are teams in the conference that we never play, then we have ceased to be a conference and are instead a little mini-NFL.

I don't have much faith that they got this right.

The choice of divisions for the newcomers, however, seems obvious in retrospect.  BC can play Syracuse, and we have a little mini-region here in the mid-Atlantic now with us, Tech, Maryland, and Pitt.  It will help our recruiting a little bit, as Pittsburgh is an area we like to have a presence in.  (The reverse will also be true, of course.)  And for once, I can see myself at a UVA football game in the future - Pittsburgh is only five hours from me.  Bloomington was six and I made it a point to get my ass down there, so Pittsburgh has its appeal.  Only problem: they don't have their own stadium and borrow that of the Steelers.  Lame.

As for basketball, I don't have a complaint about 18 games at all but I do have a beef with not playing Maryland twice every year.  Come on, man.  Screw that.  I suppose the upside is a more even spread of games against the conference in general, and the symmetry of the three-year cycle has a certain appeal.  The other upside: a slight advantage in the year-to-year schedule, assuming Tech's downward spiral is a long-term thing, as they're obviously our one scheduling buddy.

One final disappointment, but not a permanent one: no announcement about how they're gonna work the baseball schedule with an odd number of teams.  Here's a hint for the decision makers: get rid of divisions.  Pittsburgh is the school with a baseball team, so it would be kind of bullshit to merely drop them into an already ridiculously stacked Coastal.

Finally, I don't get into politics here for a reason, but I'd like you to know that the Canadian pipeline is alive and well, regardless of what the President says.  This one sends big football players to Charlottesville instead of oil to Texas, though.  The Sabre's Good Ol' Blog is reporting (via the Ottawa Citizen) that Trent Corney is UVA's first 2013 commitment.  Technically, Corney is a grayshirt, meaning he'll graduate high school this year, spend a semester at FUMA, and show up in the spring of 2013.  For recruiting board purposes that makes him an early-enrolling 2013 guy.  My thoughts on grayshirting are not happy thoughts, but the difference between this and the way Nick Saban and Les Miles do it - which is to spring it on a kid at literally the last possible minute so he doesn't have a chance to look elsewhere - is the difference between tapping another bumper parallel parking, and plowing your car into a kindergarten classroom.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

tempo-free lacrosse

If you're a lacrosse fan, or a math fan, or a lacrosse fan who likes math, then here is your post.  This is my attempt at mathifying the game.  Inspired by Ken Pomeroy's well-known basketball ratings, and a similar tempo-free approach to the game of lacrosse espoused by Great Lax State (a blog about lacrosse in the great state of Michigan), I decided to make an attempt at breaking down college lacrosse in a Pomeroyesque fashion.  Let me give you the numbers first so you know what we're building to; the explanation follows.  These are from last season.



Lacrosse, like basketball, is at its heart a game of possessions and how well you make use of them.  For our purposes here, there is one major difference: in basketball, possessions alternate without exceptions.  For every possession by the good guys, there is always a corresponding possession for the bad guys, excepting that you win the opening tip and then have the ball at the end.  But it's still a 1-for-1 deal.

In lacrosse, it's 1-for-1 except that scoring and game periods result in a faceoff, not an automatic trade of possession.  In basketball, you can count possessions with stats from the boxscore; in lacrosse, I believe we can do the same.  A team can begin a possession one of three ways:

- Win a faceoff.
- Gain the ball on the defensive end.
- Gain the ball on the offensive end.

The boxscore gives us faceoff numbers, of course.  How do you gain the ball in your offensive end?  A successful ride - that is, a failed clear by the opponent.  Also in the boxscore.  How do you gain the ball in your defensive end?  Any number of ways, but they are counted in the boxscore as either clears or failed clears.  Thus we have three ways to mark a lacrosse possession, all of which are in a standard boxscore:

- A faceoff win.
- A clearing attempt.
- A failed clear by the opponent.

So a team's total possessions in a game can be determined by adding faceoff wins, clearing attempts, and failed clears by the opponent.  Note that we leave ground balls out of it, because ground balls tell us nothing about who lost it in the first place, or where.  If you win a ground ball in your defensive end and successfully clear it, that'll show up in the boxscore.  If you win a ground ball in your offensive end, but you lost the ball to begin with, then we don't count that as a change of possession.  Possession is lost only when the other team clears (or fails to, but they had the ball and the chance to) or at the next faceoff, whether that faceoff was the result of a goal or a new quarter.

Another important difference between lacrosse and basketball is that here, we're marking the beginning of a possession.  The way KenPom does it in basketball is to mark the end.  For lacrosse, this is a more accurate way to do it.

In totaling up last year's stats, it turns out that almost exactly one-third of possessions start on a faceoff.  Tangent: this is why I will, from here on out, bang the drum that faceoff percentage is overrated.  A typical game is about 70 possessions.  (Let's say 69 for divisibility purposes.)  This game would have 23 faceoffs.  If you win 56% - an excellent number - that's 13 of 23, and since all other possessions are one-for-one by definition (that is, after a faceoff, teams will trade clears until someone scores or the period ends) you get half of the remaining 46 and 13 of the faceoff 23, for 36.  The other team gets 33.  Your prowess at the faceoff X gave you just 52% of the possessions.  While that can swing the tide in a close game, it's not the end-all, be-all that it's often portrayed as.  People freak out about losing too many faceoffs, and it seems logical to do so, but much more important is your clearing game, offense, defense, etc.  Does it matter?  Absolutely it matters.  But only when faceoff percentage gets really large - over 60% or so - does it start to have a major, freakoutable impact.

OK, anyway.  Faceoffs are one-third of possessions, and the rest are one-for-one.  This is where that difference from basketball comes to get us, because we can't split the possessions evenly; we have to weight them.  The final numbers above show how many goals a team would score and give up in a 100-possession game; how do we get there from here?  If Team A is expected to score 16 goals in a 100-possession game, where do I get that number?

-- First, we determine how many of those 100 possessions belong to Team A.  That's easy.  33 possessions are allocated to faceoffs and 67 are split evenly between Team A and their opponent, Team B.  Team A gets 33.5 possessions plus their faceoff percentage times 33.  The equation:

33.5 + (FO% * 33)

-- Next, we need to know how many of those possessions made it to the offensive side of the field.  You can't score if you don't get into the box.  (OK, you can, but we're ignoring acts of God here.)  Faceoff wins are assumed to always make it to the offensive side, because the boxscores don't differentiate.

Last season's data shows that of the 67 non-faceoff possessions, 57 start on the defensive end and 10 are the result of a ride.  Therefore we give Team A five offensive zone possessions and add them to the possessions given them by faceoffs.  Then we look at their clearing percentage.  Multiply their clearing percentage by 28.5 (half of 57) and add the result to the above.  The resulting equation is:

(FO% * 33) + (CL% * 28.5) + 5

Now in our fictitious 100-possession game, we know how many times Team A had the ball in the offensive zone.  In real life, we know how many goals Team A scored (obviously) and we also know how many actual offensive possessions they had, because we can add up their clears, rides, and faceoff wins.  Simply dividing goals by offensive possessions gives you a percentage, which, multiplied by the offensive possessions per 100 we just came up with, gives you the team's final O-rating.

And you can repeat the whole process for defense as well.  Essentially the D-rating is each team's opponents' O-rating, as if the combined opponents' stats were for one team.

There's your explanation.  Let me now try and pre-emptively fend off a few questions:

Why does it say "raw" O-rating (and D-rating) on the header?

Because I don't have a good way of adjusting for strength of schedule.  Yet.  I do have one way, but it's crude and not fit for public consumption and not even useful til at least three-quarters of the season is over - although it does at least do a better job of putting the best teams at the top.

Why not simply rank the teams by goal percentage and goals-allowed percentage, instead of all that rigamarole about possessions?

That does have its appeal.  But it doesn't tell the whole story.  By rolling up faceoff percentage and clearing percentage into the statistic, you get a better sense of how dangerous a team really is.  Take Yale, a team that was very close to making the tournament last year.  They had a very pedestrian, middle-of-the-road goal percentage - 28th.  Their phenomenal faceoff percentage makes them much more dangerous than the Marists of the world, though, and they are 13th in this O-rating calculation.  Likewise, a very good defensive goals percentage plus that faceoff prowess makes them tough to score on.

What if a team is credited with a clear directly after winning a faceoff?  That would skew their possession numbers.

Smarter lax fans than I will have to speak up and say how often that happens, if at all.  I don't know.  If it doesn't, great; if it does, oh well, the boxscore doesn't make a distinction, and so I have to work with what I got.  I thought about that early on but realized, either way, I can't do anything about it.  So I stopped giving it any thought.

But if a team's riding ability is really good, shouldn't that give them an offensive advantage, and vice versa if it's poor?  Instead of just handing out the same number to everyone to "account" for the ride?

Kind of.  I would indeed like to refine this thing a little more to include that.  For the sake of accuracy and accountability and waterproofing the formula and all that.  But as a rough go, it's pretty close; successful rides aren't all that common to mess with the numbers too much.  And the truth is that unless a team really presses (which rarely happens outside of endgame situations when a team is trying to come back) whether or not the ball is cleared has a lot more to do with the clearing team.

Are you going to update this during the season?

No.  If you haven't noticed, I'm a damn superstar at promising I will continuously update something and then not doing it.  I will do it on my own during the season, use the numbers in previews and analysis and such, and share them at the end of the year, and upon request.

Can't you make this damn thing sortable?

No.  I just write.  I took one programming class in college and it was the biggest mistake I ever made in those four years.  Someone wanna help me out in that department, be my guest.

I have more questions!

Then ask them.  Nothing like a little scrutiny to help make these things better.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

signstravaganza 2012

Normally I like to wait til late in the evening for the annual Signstravaganza post, but hell with it; this year's class is drama-free and we're not waiting for anything.  (The Stefon Diggs ship has sailed, so don't even get your heart rate up.)

UVA has received 26 letters of intent.  OK, 25; being already enrolled, Greyson Lambert doesn't have to sign one.  For those who keep track of scholarships, that gives us 88 total committed scholarships for next fall, three over the limit of 85.  Take away one because Connor McCartin is going medical next year due to concussions, so, 87.  One of the worst-kept secrets in history is that Tyrell Chavis is probably going to have to prep, so make it 86.  In other words, normal attrition will get us below the 85 number without much trouble.  You probably weren't worried about oversigning anyway, but there you go.

This class had been ranked in every service's top 25, but that was bound to take a hit since we'd wrapped it up and not everyone else had.  We were always going to get leapfrogged.  Still, even with the NLOID signings going on, UVA doesn't drop far - in most cases, just outside top 25s.  26th to Rivals, 27th to Scout.  And still 20th to 24/7.  It doesn't have the star power or Signing Day glitz of last year (when we added Darius Jennings and Dominique Terrell on the big day) - and star-wise it falls short of VT's - but it's a solid continuation of last year's efforts.

Time for the positional rundown on this year's class:

QUARTERBACK

In a year in which I wouldn't have been surprised if we didn't take any quarterbacks, we took two.  It looks like we're logjamming the position and that taking both Johns and Lambert puts a 2013 quarterback in real jeopardy.  Which would be too bad because the instate crop, after being completely barren this year, is huge for the 2013 class.  Huge.

But, it's less crammed up than you might think.  Mike Rocco is the starter and, barring something unforeseen and highly unfortunate, will be for the next two years.  Metheny seems perfectly happy with his role on the team; people tend to assume he will be the next to transfer but he has got Happy Hoo written on his face.  Talk about a guy that loves UVA.  I don't expect him to transfer, but neither do I expect he'll be seen as an obstacle.  Watford is a wild card, of course, and may or may not end up at safety or something.  At any rate I don't think this two-man QB class will be a huge impediment to 2013 recruiting.  It won't help, but it won't be a decisive factor.

Both of these guys have "prototypical" size, which means they're tall, at best moderately mobile, pocket passers.  In terms of the recruiting metrics - stars and offers - Johns has a profile awfully similar to Metheny, while Lambert is the star attraction who was courted by Alabama, Georgia, etc. etc.  But Johns had the more productive senior year of high school.  Lambert will no doubt continue to be a star attraction this spring, as the new kid on the block in spring practice, but the truth is both are likely to stay in the shadows for a couple years, and compete with each other the whole time.  If all goes well, by the time Rocco has graduated as the all-time leading passer in UVA history (don't laugh - he will if he stays on pace) the decision as to who will succeed him will already have been made.  This class sets up a stable succession order, a much better state of affairs then yearly camp battles.

RUNNING BACK/FULLBACK

Kye Morgan should be a solid addition, but he's the only one.  We could've really used a big bruiser to complement this class.  And there aren't any fullbacks or any candidates to move there, meaning that position will have to be filled from within the current roster as we only have Zach Swanson there next year.

WIDE RECEIVER/TIGHT END

A bit unnecessarily in my stupid blogger opinion, London and co. loaded up on the receivers like crazy.  We FUMA-shirted Adrian Gamble, and he's joined by no fewer than five other players at this point at receiver.  That includes Kyle Dockins, who the school lists as a receiver rather than a tight end.  This is the kind of thing that fuels speculation that guys like Anthony Cooper will end up at safety.  Since we have zero safeties in this class (as Kevin Green pretty much officially didn't make it and Demeitre Brim is a linebacker) this would seem like it sorta kinda makes sense.  Plus, Cooper is listed as "ATH" by the school right now.  So.

The biggest catch (you see what I'm doing here?) is Canaan Severin.  Cooper is every bit as talented, but like I said: probable future safety.  Severin and Cooper are the two guys driving the rankings.  Then there's Mario Nixon, one of my favorite recruits just because he got the Hokies' panties all in a twist by flipping allegiances in August.  It caused them to say stupid things like "Anyone that breaks a commitment is not someone we want on our team," which means they'll be kicking Darius Redman off the team any day now.

Max Valles will likely join the team as a tight end, replacing Dockins in the pipeline, which is an improvement because Dockins would've had to put on a ton of weight.  Valles is much closer to field-ready in that department.

OFFENSIVE LINE

No stars here.  But no fliers, either.  OK, maybe one, in Canadian FUMA prepper Ryan Doull, but even that isn't like we had to dig real deep.  This class is the very definition of solid when it comes to the offensive side of the trenches.  And as I've mentioned, VT will have the higher-ranked class when the dust settles today - but they flamed out almost completely on the O-line.  If you can't get any major stars (think Eugene Monroe or Morgan Moses when they committed) this kind of class is the ideal O-line group.  (And this was a thin year for offensive linemen in the state.)  UVA has done a nice job maintaining continuity and a stable succession plan at O-line, and the remarkable thing is it carried over nicely between coaching regimes.  This class keeps the conveyor belt humming along.

A short note: four linemen signed LOIs, but there will be a fifth in the class - instate lineman Jackson Matteo committed yesterday as a recruited walk-on.  Matteo had committed to a scholarship from Temple over several other MAC offers, but preferred to pay his own way in the ACC.

DEFENSIVE LINE

Here's where to find the star power.  Eli Harold is not only the #1 recruit in the state (even Doughty says so) he's the top guy on our list according to everyone you ask.  Freakish athletic pass-rushing ability is something we now lack on the current roster, giving Harold a wide open lane to freshman-year playing time.  Both he and Michael Moore turned down the lure of Florida and the approximately forty-two hepzillion other offers they had, to play for Virginia, and in Moore's case, Dad.  In any other year Courtnye Wynn would be an attention-grabbing pickup, but this year, he gets a tad overshadowed.  No matter.  UVA's defensive line of the future is scary.

And we shouldn't forget about the fourth D-liner, Tyrell Chavis, who, through family circumstances out of his control, will need a FUMA-shirt year before he's eligible.  Not only has he got a great shot to be a starter at nose tackle in the future, he's helping keep a Varina pipeline open to UVA - a happy hunting ground for sure.

LINEBACKER

The big deal here, of course, is Kwontie Moore.  Moore is one of the top three recruits in this class, and if all goes well during his career, he'll give us the kind of range at inside linebacker that we haven't had in a while.  Guys like Steve Greer and Jon Copper are/were strong, powerful, and heady players, but they never had the side-to-side abilities that Moore should possess.

The other two linebackers are intriguing and two of the more interesting stories of the recruiting season.  Mark Hall was the first commit of the class, and he comes from a UVA family; his younger brother Devon is said to be an even better basketball player than Mark is a footballer, and will likely give his commitment to Tony Bennett eventually.  Demeitre Brim was another very early commit, sold on the school and coaches by Kwontie Moore (who wasn't even committed yet.)  He gave his verbal before even visiting, and for a while was a target of a great host of other schools attempting to pry him free.  It didn't work.  UVA got in the door early on a fairly big-time Florida prospect here and slammed it shut before the big-timey-ness really got out to the world.

DEFENSIVE BACK

There isn't the star power here, but there's certainly quantity.  The best-known name to UVA fans is Maurice Canady, who isn't a guarantee to land at cornerback anyway.  Canady was a camp commit and not generating much attention otherwise, until a senior season where he was forced into quarterback duty for Varina and left cleat marks on everyone unfortunate enough to have to try and stop him.  After a rocky first outing, he dominated.

But as a cornerback, he's as much a square-one guy as the rest of this class.  C.J. Moore is fast (insanely fast) but small.  Kelvin Rainey is the purest cornerback in the class, but he comes from Houston so he hasn't generated much buzz, and he didn't get much of a sniff from instate schools above C-USA level.  This group is essentially a big blender, from which a couple of these guys will emerge as players and a couple will not.

KICKER/PUNTER

No scholarship guys, but some recruited walk-ons who'll join other recruited walk-ons in a wide-open, no-holds-barred, celebrity deathmatch for the starting jobs in the fall, at which point we'll all hold our breath the first time the winner trots out to try a field goal because there's nothing worse than breaking in a new kicker.  This is not as much fun as when we yoinked Jimmy Howell from Northwestern.

***********************************************

OK, so, let's get to the lists:

Top five stories of the 2012 recruiting season:

1. UVA flips Mario Nixon to complete the Norfolk Christian quadfecta, along with Wil Wahee, Courtnye Wynn, and Kwontie Moore.  Nixon, at the behest of his NCS teammates, visited a UVA fall practice while still technically a VT verbal, causing the Tech contingent to huff about broken promises and such.  If you believe Hokie fans, their coaches are petty enough to pull his offer for that; regardless, it made waves for a couple days.

2. UVA fans hold their breath as Michael Moore, in trying to decide between Florida and Virginia, schedules a trip to Gainesville, reschedules at Will Muschamp's suggestion due to the latter's absence, takes the trip, and chooses Virginia anyway.

3. Greyson Lambert commits after Mike London demonstrates what a coach should do in the event of his absence during a prospect's visit: make a personalized video for him to watch.  Lambert was so impressed he and his dad asked to watch it a second time so they could record it on their phones and show Mom.

4. Demeitre Brim makes a surprise early commitment, and UVA fends off a number of other suitors over the summer, including Miami and Wisconsin.

5. Eli Harold, whose mother passed away from cancer a couple years ago, chooses her birthday to announce his choice of UVA (over Penn State and Florida), and immediately becomes Virginia's recruiter-in-chief among prospects, much as Clifton Richardson was in 2011.

Five most likely to play as true freshmen:

1. Eli Harold
2. Canaan Severin
3. Maurice Canady
4. Demeitre Brim
5. Michael Moore

This is in order, by the way.  Harold is the top choice because he checks off all the boxes: he's got the athleticism and the talent, and he fills a need.  Severin doesn't quite fill a need, but he does fill a niche - he's a likely candidate to jump right in as a possession receiver, with Matt Snyder and Kris Burd graduating.  When Snyder went down with a broken foot, he was simply replaced with more of Burd, which indicates that nobody on the roster was available and/or ready to fill that possession role.  Severin might.

Canady is the latest exhibit in the assertion that Virginia fans get way too excited about instate talent that dazzles in high school.  Still, dazzle he did, and if he's got half the athleticism of the hype, he'll make a great special-teamer as a freshman, and make a push to get on the field as a nickel corner, too.  London has made passing references to the idea that Ausar Walcott might have outgrown linebacker (I still think this is a motivational tactic, but still.)  If that's the case then we need a new Will.  Caleb Taylor is the current backup, but Brim could find his way into a role there.  And Moore is simply a big guy with the kind of talent you can't ignore.  Eventually I think he settles into a role at tackle instead of end, but even with a stacked lineup at D-line, he's got the ability to carve out a role for himself.

All that said, we played quite a few true freshmen at various places last year; this season, there'll be a lot more redshirting going on.

Five I'm most excited about:

1. Eli Harold
2. Kwontie Moore
3. Michael Moore
4. Greyson Lambert
5. Canaan Severin

Defense, defense, defense.  My favorite thing in football to watch is an unstoppable running back; we don't have that, but we do have my second-favorite thing: a stacked defensive line.  All of these guys had offers from the kind of schools that people don't expect UVA to beat out for talent.

Five sleepers:

1. Demeitre Brim
2. Mark Hall
3. Ryan Doull
4. Maurice Canady
5. Kye Morgan

Inclusion on this list requires two things: you must have been given the two-star of doom by at least one recruiting service, and I must think something about your game is well above two-star.  This year we had a lot of choices, because there was a lot of disagreement among the services who our two-stars were.  Only one got two stars from everyone.  These are my top five "two-stars," but the truth is that all of them had three-star ratings from at least two services.

Hell, Brim was thisclose to being a four-star at both Rivals and ESPN.  But Scout left him at two.  That plus the fervor at which other schools tried to convert him makes him sleeper #1.  Hall is a mid-to-high three-star to everyone but ESPN, and I think because he committed so early, he's the #1 most-overlooked recruit by UVA fans.  Doull got his two-star from Scout, but he's a 300-pound guy with a lacrosse/hockey background.  ESPN says strength and run-blocking are his positives, and this is a guy who supposedly runs a 5.0 forty (per Rivals.)  I'd be skeptical of that time, but "nimble feet" are always mentioned in his scouting reports no matter who's writing them.  I'll take it.

Canady, we've discussed in some detail already, but still got three stars from just two services. And one was a late-season adjustment.  Morgan got a baffling two stars from ESPN, which is disappointing considering his offer list.  The funny thing is that Morgan was a heavy Rutgers lean until Rutgers informed him his spot was taken, and by a guy with almost universally lower ratings and no offers but the Rutgers one.  (And now the one coach that wanted him is employed by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.)  Thanks, Rutgers.

Eat it, Tech:

Eli Harold
Andre Miles-Redmond
Courtnye Wynn
Kwontie Moore
Mario Nixon

The guys with Tech offers.  The list the other way round is much bigger, though.

Eat it, Terps:

Eli Harold

The surprisngly teeny-weeny list of guys with Maryland offers.  No, the list the other way round is not any bigger, comprising just two players: Wes Brown and P.J. Gallo, the latter of which I've never heard of.  There are other players we both offered, of course, who went to other schools, but this is a shockingly tiny overlap all the same.  How, for example, did Michael Moore not have a Maryland offer?  Do you suppose things like that are why Terp fans are so pissed at Randy Edsall?

Eat it, Carolina:

Eli Harold
Kwontie Moore
Michael Moore

Dude even had a Carolina offer.  We didn't succeed in pulling anyone out of North Carolina this year.  This is a 3-to-3 tie, with Carolina getting three guys with a UVA offer, although none of them are on this level.  But they can probably claim victories in the real head-to-head showdowns, earning commitments from both Jon Heck and Nathan Staub, both of whom we recruited fairly hard.

The ones that got away:

Stefon Diggs (undeclared)
Alex Carter (Stanford)
DeVante Harris (Texas A&M)
J.C. Coleman (Tech)
Win Homer (Boston College)
Trey Edmunds (Tech)
Adam Bisnowaty (Pittsburgh)
Imani Cross (Nebraska)
Brent Wilkerson (Penn State)
Chris Mangus (Tech)
Nathan Staub (North Carolina)
C.J. Prosise (Notre Dame)

These are the biggest misses of the class.  All of them are players we had a legitimate, real shot at, and would still fill a real need even today.  I didn't include, for example, Nigel Williams (because we have Courtnye Wynn, who's a very similar player) or Brendan Nosovitch (because we ended up just fine at quarterback) or Eddie Goldman, with whom our chances were always tenuous at their very best.  Guys like Staub or Cross would've filled a real role that's more or less missing in this class.  Same for Prosise or Carter, as talented safeties.

***********************************************

You asked for it last year and I didn't have it, so here it is this year: the original recruiting board, from back when I first posted it.  As you'll notice, not a lot of overlap between this and the final result.  2012 was definitely the year of the surprise, with UVA getting a lot of commitments (Brim, Hall, Dockins, Brown, etc.) before anyone had even had a chance to hear of the name.

There you are.  The final, updated product is available at the link on the side, and if you're curious about the final straggler names on there, their fates are as follows:

- Imani Cross to Nebraska
- Korren Kirven to Alabama
- Stefon Diggs hasn't decided yet.
- Mike Tyson..... poor, idealistic (or lazy) Mike Tyson.  He had offers from PSU, UVA, and VT this summer, but either he didn't want to be bothered with the process at the time or just procrastinated, and all those doors closed.  Tyson missed the bus.  He talked, at the time, of wanting to focus on other things besides recruiting, not a totally unreasonable thing for a high school rising senior to say, but unfortunately not the way things work these days.  It'll be interesting to see what happens.

If you click over to the board, I'd like to finish this up by drawing your attention to one thing.  Something I've been noticing since around the beginning of the season in September, but that I didn't want to mention for fear of jinxing it.  Previous final editions of the recruiting board have had a maroon section at the bottom; this one is conspicuously missing it.  This is not as high-powered a class as 2011, and Tech can claim victory in this year's recruiting wars - in fact it took one of their best classes in quite a while to do it.  But London and Co. can claim a major victory in keeping that maroon section completely off this year's board.

Who gets slotted into the maroon?  Decommitments.