Showing posts with label unis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unis. Show all posts

Monday, June 1, 2015

super, thanks for asking

It took a while, but spring finally sprung, as they say.  You can tell because UVA sports have begun kicking ass again.

So much that was said about the Lake Elsinore regional came true.  Evenly-matched?  Yup - the regional flipped upside-down right out of the gate, with the top two teams both facing elimination after one day.  UCSB as a shaky host?  Yup again - the only one seed not to win a game.  And UVA needing to race through at top speed or else miss out on the supers?  I guess we don't know for sure, which is good.

But BOC sure felt that way.  In other years, Josh Sborz probably wouldn't have been kept on the mound after his team padded a 3-1 lead with three more runs brought to you by Geico.  And he wouldn't have been asked to "save" a five-run lead after pitching the previous two days, either.  Sborz's usage tells you all you need to know about how BOC felt about stretching out the series, which is to say, DON'T, at all costs short of shredding all his elbow ligaments.

It's obvious why: come the 11th inning, the Hoos were down to one unused pitcher, who was also the center fielder.  Had UVA lost that game I don't know what the hell, man.  You'd have had to hope a combination of Adam Haseley and Alec Bettinger could've gotten you through seven innings, eight if you're really lucky, and then I suppose more of Sborz (who wouldn't have gone on Sunday if he wasn't protecting a lead) and then some dudes who'd pitched like three innings all year.

Scary thought.  Less scary had San Diego State held on in the losers' bracket, because their pitching staff is in even worse shape, which makes me sort of wish they'd beaten USC and then us on Sunday to set up a hitters' duel for the ages.  If 14-10 represents the mutual near-collapse of two pitching staffs, I'd've bet everything on the over in a UVA-SDSU matchup on Monday.  I guess we'll just have to settle for winning the regional the semi-easy way.

A lot of credit goes to hitting that was clutcher than clutch.  Ernie Clement delivered the game-winning hit on Saturday and almost the whole lineup made Sunday happen, but for my money the guys who won this regional are Connor Jones and Brandon Waddell.  This simply doesn't happen if they don't both pitch into the eighth, combine for sixteen innings, and allow one lousy run each.  UVA will advance through the tournament as long as those two pitch lights-out, and be eliminated when they don't.

***************************************************

I have yet to exult in UVA's 22nd national championship, so: woohoo tennis!  Five schools have won multiple national championships this season - UConn, Colorado, Ohio State, Stanford, and, of course, because I wouldn't mention it otherwise, UVA.  Three years ago, men's tennis was a program with a rep for being that program that couldn't get over the hump.  Now with two trophies, they've taken their place in the elite.  Hopefully for quite some time.

I was also going to write about consecutive trophies, but I forgot it was two years ago they won their first.  I realized I was thinking of Danielle Collins's individual singles championship last year.  Silly me, mixing up our powerhouse programs like that.  It didn't help my muddled situation that Ryan Shane won the singles title this year.  All these damn trophies are so confusing to keep track of.  How I long for the simplicity of life in Blacksburg and the clean, uncluttered trophy cases and freed-up postseason schedules.  Oh wait no I don't.

***************************************************

-- Don't you love when you watch this really long drawn-out recruitment that takes years and then the subject of said recruitment sticks around for one season and then boogies?  Jamil Kamara's name first popped up when he was a high school freshman at Princess Anne.  His full UVA career: one catch, six yards.  Unlike the loss of Greyson Lambert I don't really chalk this up to the fact that this program is the result of a crash between a fireworks truck and an oil tank.  I guess you could argue that there's excessive WR depth and that the inmates are just a little too much in charge of the asylum when it comes to redshirting decisions.  I'd happily concede both points.  It's just that Kamara's overinflated opinion of his readiness is why he didn't redshirt last year in the first place, and why he'll be suiting up elsewhere next year.

-- I know the baseball team's camo unis have a near-perfect win-loss record.  I still hate them.  Especially when the home whites are so damn classy-looking and they finally got a set of decent road grays.  I'd just hate to think we might finally win a national title and all the lasting images of the team that does so would be in brown.

Sunday, September 28, 2014

anticlimactic

News came out earlier last week that the color commentator for the internetz broadcast of the Kent State game would be none other than Al Groh himself.  Not just a few UVA fans were hoping he'd say something that'd sound a lot like the same guy who read the man-in-the-glass poem as his public farewell to the program.  Some might also have been hoping for some better insight to the current program than the average joe-blow.

I think both camps were disappointed.  Groh made exactly one reference to his coaching career, and it was to his Jets days and even then it was a nice little anecdote about Khalek Shepherd's dad rather than "well I did this and I did that."  "Circumstances" never escaped his lips, he only even bothered with one goofy-ass word the whole game ("UVA re-personneled their special teams units") no poems were read, and I'd give him a solid B or B- as a commentator - a bit like Bobby Knight lite.  Would listen again - but would not expect flamboyant entertainment.

So went the game.  Had the second half gone like the first, it would've generated post-game fireworks win or lose.  Then UVA came out for the third quarter and clamped way the hell down.  You can easily imagine the halftime message in the visitors' locker room - keep it up, we got this, right where we wanted 'em, etc. etc.  When the quarter turned again, Matt Johns had just rumbled 42 yards and turned the field almost completely around on a Kent State defense that'd seen their deficit blow up from four to twenty-one points in a near blink.  I imagine the message by then was "well, shit."

The ACC schedule now begins in earnest, after one heavy-duty appetizer, and the Hoos have done as well as anyone could expect - maybe a touch better.  Nobody's checked out with a trail of Fire Londons in their wake, and the "division" is wide-open enough to hold everyone's interest.  The whole season still hangs in the balance, but that's the whole point.  Barring a jaw-dropping miracle, the only way anything could've been decided by now was decidedly negative.  We'll go into October with nothing predetermined.  I like it that way.  Well, I'd like it better if we could say we just don't know which bowl we're going to, but right now, what we have is a lot better than what some others have.  I'll take it.

*******************************************

-- Ongoing quarterback opinion: Matt Johns did a nice job and Greyson Lambert is still the starter.  But there's competition in a good way.  Lambert is being pushed hard here.

-- My usual take on games like this applies here.  That is, if you flip the two halves of the game, nobody would worry.  I'm probably overreacting because I don't think too many folks are up in arms over the first half, which had all the imprints of a team coming off a bye week (as Kent State was) and having spent that whole two weeks drawing up stuff to attack UVA with.  And then running out of ideas after UVA adjusted.

-- Quin Blanding just rocketed past the linebacker duo of Coley and Romero in the team tackles lead.

-- These throwbacks are sharp, and would be more than perfectly acceptable as the regular uniforms if you topped them with the regular blue helmet with the V-sabres.  Especially if that helmet had stripes matching the shoulder stripes.

Prediction summary!

- Demetrious Nicholson plays.

- So does Daniel Hamm.

- Greyson Lambert does not.  This was sort of a cheap way to pick up three correct predictions, but at least it lets me take credit for reading tea leaves correctly as well as calling the game as being out of hand early enough to dig deep into the bench.

- UVA's top three backs - Parks, Mizzell, and Shepherd - each beat their season averages per carry, which right now are 3.1, 3.4, and 4.6.  Well, drat: the first two guys blew up those numbers but Shepherd did not come close.  Still, the running game was effective.  If Kevin Mizzell (or Taquan Parks) were the feature workhorse back, he'd have gone 122 yards on 21 carries, an excellent day.

- Kent State fails to reach 50 yards on the ground, including sacks.  The ESPN stats are a little messed up here, and I think it's because they don't count runs that end in fumbles as yardage.  The UVA and KSU sites agree: the Flashes went 85 yards forward and 51 yards backward, culminating in a prediction win.

- Max Valles records at least one sack and two batted passes.  He was a sack and a batted pass short.

Four out of six (albeit a bit of a cheapish four; next week I won't go that route) results in the following stats for the year:

11-for-24 on specifics (45.8%)
3-1 straight up
2-1 ATS

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

uniform tracker

Because I'm so fully on top of it when it comes to updating everything on the side, I thought I'd give myself one more project.  If I remember to keep doing it, this'll be a tracker of how well UVA has performed in each one of their uniform combinations.  If we can get a big enough sample size (30 years or so oughta do it, assuming I still have time to blog and be a grandpa) it should be a good indicator of which uniform we should wear for optimal performance.

Here are the possible combos, listed helmet-jersey-pants.  There's a G, B, or U next to each; they refer to my verdicts from last year's fashionista post, which were Good, Bad, or Ugly.  The first record is straight up; the second is against the spread so appropriate credit can be given for wins like the near-upset against USC in the first year of the London era.  They don't add up to the same thing because I can't find historical spreads for all games, mostly our older I-AA games.

(B) Blue-blue-blue: 1-3, 0-3
(G) Blue-blue-white: 1-4, 1-4
(B) Blue-blue-orange: 1-1, 0-2

(G) Blue-white-blue: 0-2, 0-2
(B) Blue-white-white: 5-2, 5-2
(G) Blue-white-orange: 0-3, 2-1

(G) Blue-orange-blue: 6-4, 5-3-1
(B) Blue-orange-white: 2-0, 1-0-1
(U) Blue-orange-orange: 0-1, 0-1

(U) Orange-blue-blue: 0-0, 0-0
(B) Orange-blue-white: 0-0, 0-0
(G) Orange-blue-orange: 1-1, 0-2

(B) Orange-white-blue: 0-0, 0-0
(U) Orange-white-white: 0-2, 1-1
(B) Orange-white-orange: 0-1, 0-1

(B) Orange-orange-blue: 0-2, 0-2
(B) Orange-orange-white: 1-0, 0-0
(U) Orange-orange-orange: 0-0, 0-0

Throwbacks: 0-1, 0-1

Compilations:

Blue helmets: 16-20, 14-18-2
Orange helmets: 2-6, 1-6

Blue jerseys: 4-9, 1-11
White jerseys: 5-10, 8-7
Orange jerseys: 9-7, 6-6-2

Blue pants: 7-11, 5-11
White pants: 9-8, 8-7-1
Orange pants: 2-7, 2-7

Some notes on history:

-- 2010 was definitely a sandbox kind of year.  The players tried out their new toy with every uniform combo at least once, but also declared a favorite (something new, because it's not old, as is always the case) by wearing orange jersey and blue pants three times.

-- 2011, on the other hand, might've been either the product of superstition or the product of "you lose uniform picking privileges on the road," since the team selected several different looks at home but mostly only one on the road.

-- Sadly, the only win we've seen in the beautiful, "traditional" blue-blue-white combo (earning that label for being created during the UVA heyday, the only one truly associated nationally with us being good at football) was this year's VMI campaign.  They had been a dismal 0-4 til then.

-- Blue-white-white, however, has been wildly successful.  It was the combo for most of the road games during 2011, including Florida State, and was also the look for last year's large, surprising, probably-TOB-chasing win over NC State.  Blue-orange-blue has also been a winning look.

-- Orange jerseys and white pants have the only winning records in their respective groups; the combo has only been worn twice together, though.  Duke and Eastern Michigan were the recipients of those beatings.

Note - complete through Georgia Tech, October 26, 2013

Thursday, October 18, 2012

fashionista

Before we dive straight into today's post, in which I channel my inner Paul Lukas, there are three things you must know before we start.

-- One. This post is about uniforms.  I am a huge get-off-my-lawner about uniforms.  I admit that part of this is because "my" UVA wears a blue helmet and looks a certain way.  Other people grew up with white helmets and some of you really older folks saw orange ones.  I like blue ones in part because that's what I'm used to.  But also because it's a brand.  Look, the way you look on a football field is a brand.  All it should take to know who's playing is a glance at the TV, without even having to look at the scorebug.  If it's blue and white you see, it's probably Penn State.  If it's maize and blue, it's Michigan.  Burnt orange and white, it's Texas.  If you went blind, Oregon.

Nobody in our conference uses a navy blue helmet like we do.  And surprisingly few teams in the country wear a blue-blue-white (note - this column is going to use a "color-color-color" nomenclature, which is helmet-jersey-pants) combination.  On the other hand, we have already cribbed two other ACC looks this season: orange-orange-white is Clemson's style and their primary look, and orange-blue-orange is Syracuse all the way.  (It's also Illinois.)  I know we are never going to have the cachet of a winged helmet like Michigan or a traditional, instantly recognizable look like Penn State, but guess what: as hard as we try, we will also never be Oregon.

So this column, which is going to evaluate the aesthetics of the various new uniform combinations of the London-era jerseys, isn't to be taken as an endorsement of any wild-ass "Oregon of the East" ideas people might have.  You want me to go full Walt Kowalski on you, I'll add that I think the desire to be constantly changing uniforms is a product of the annoyingly short and microwaveable attention span, and that, for many reasons, "the kids like it" is a thoroughly bogus and discreditable argument.  Essentially what I think is that the orange helmet should be chucked posthaste, and that I'm less ornery about the nine possible jersey-pants combos.  Seriously, if nine isn't good enough for you, you might need some Ritalin.

-- Two.  This is poor timing for this post, but whatever I've had this sucker planned for a while and it's time to get a move-on with it because very soon now basketball is going to demand the mid-week slots.  It's poor timing because the team is playing badly and it's my opinion the coaches should take the uniform decisions out of the hands of the captains until the team plays better.  Just a little extra thing to let them know they mean it.  Kind of like when growing up you could tell the difference between when you got yelled at but it was cool because Mom wasn't really mad, she just wanted you to stop what you were doing, and the times when you got yelled at and you knew you'd better just stay out of Mom's way the rest of the day cause she was on the warpath.  I've seen it suggested we should just go plain old blue-blue-white and blue-white-white for the rest of the season, but I decided I'd rather not because I don't want the team to associate the classic good looks with losing.

-- Three.  This post owes a major debt of gratitude to the excellent hoosfootball.com website, which tracks uni combinations and I mean back to the Lambeth Field days.  I have borrowed a few pictures from there without asking, when I couldn't find something elsewhere, and if the owner and proprietor asks me to, I'll take 'em down.  But you should definitely visit; it's an absolute treasure trove.

Alright, the extensive preliminaries out of the way, it's time to turn into fashion critics and talk uniforms.  This is my take on the good, the bad, and the ugly.  Pictures are provided for each combo, and pictures of other teams or some creative and very bad photoshopping if we've never worn it, to give you a rough idea of what it might look like.

THE NEVER-WORN

-- Orange-orange-orange


Also known as "the most hideous shit imaginable."  Solid color combinations very, very rarely look good.  Certain colors are wose than others.  This would be as bad as it gets.  Mercifully, the Hoos have only worn orange jerseys over orange pants once, two years ago, and it looked horrible.  Pair an orange helmet with it and I'd want to stab out my eyes.  It'd be worse than you see above, because our pant stripes aren't as substantial and you can barely make out the V-sabres on the orange helmet, which by the way has no stripe, and basically we'd be walking traffic cones.  Yuck.  Do some crappy two-second photoshopping, and you get this:


Yeah, fuck that.  Talk about hideous.

-- Orange-blue-white


This has it's possibilities, and there's a part of me that'd be intrigued to see this.  It does have a problem: as we'll see later, the white pants don't work well with orange helmets.  But it also has one other problem:


It's not the best idea if the goal is to avoid other teams' patented looks.

-- Orange-blue-blue


I promised you bad photoshops and that's exactly what you're getting.  It doesn't matter here.  You take the lesser of two helmet options and you stick it on top of one of the worst jersey-pants combos we have, and you get the definition of a bad idea.  I hate this idea so much I almost used a VT helmet for the photoshop, just to drive home the point.

-- Orange-white-blue


I can't really find a suitable set of pictures to photoshop.  It was harder than I thought to find this one, but Florida wears it relatively often.  I'll get into it later but I really dig the blue-white-orange look, so flipping it has some real potential.  This is roughly what you'd get, only with a darker blue.

-- Orange-white-orange





It's a pretty sharp combo.  I'm sure we'd look good wearing it.  But are you picking up on a theme here?

THE ONCE-WORN

-- Orange-orange-white


I said the orange helmet doesn't work with the white pants, and now I'll tell you why: the blue stripes.  The pants' blue stripes are there because Nike expected us to wear them with blue helmets.  It looks mismatched.  I don't care for this look, and other teams (ahemClemson) pull it off much better.

-- Orange-white-white


 This isn't quite the "standard" look; the gray facemasks screw it up a bit.  Somebody got the bright idea to take the throwback helmets from the previous game (which was a well-executed look, by the way) and slap the regular decals on them.  Gray facemasks are a cute thing teams do these days when they want their helmets to look old-timey, and it's really played out.  Unless your team colors allow it (Ohio State) or you've basically never stopped wearing them (Notre Dame) you shouldn't wear gray facemasks outside of throwback games.  This is just a bad deal overall; it suffers from the same orange-helmet-blue-pant-stripes problem as above, but at least with the orange jerseys, the numbers matched the helmet decals, with white outlined in blue.  Here you've got blue numbers outline in orange, a white decal outlined in blue, blue new-age stripes with no outline, and an old-school blue helmet strip with no outline.  It's a hodge-podgey mess.

-- Blue-orange-orange


Once was once too many.

-- Orange-orange-blue


The Peach Bowl look.  OK, I guess.  Honestly would look a million miles better without the bowl patch.  (Go ahead - cover it up with your finger.  It really is better.)  I don't have a very strong opinion one way or the other here, except that I was feeling thrown off all game long, as it was the first time I'd ever seen the team in orange lids.  There's nothing really wrong with the look, and admittedly it does stand out.  It's not the best, though, and it just feels off, though I could be transferring my thrown-off feeling from the game itself.

THE TWICE-WORN

-- Orange-blue-orange


Of the orange-lidded looks we have worn, this is the best.  Other than possibly orange-white-blue, it might be the best of all nine orange-helmeted combos.  The blue stripes on orange pants match the blue sabres on orange helmets, and the white numbers match the V.  And besides that, unlike most of the other times we've seen orange helmets, it just looks natural on TV.  If I had my way except that I was told we'd have to have orange hats occasionally, this is the only combo they'd be worn with.

-- Blue-white-blue


It's too bad this has only been worn twice and they've both been losses, because it's a sharp look.  It's not flashy but it works.  Again, Nike gave us pant stripes the way they did because they were expecting blue helmets, and the orange stripes mirror the orange sabres.  (The blue helmet, by the way, is a better than the orange because you can see the damn sabres.)  Blue numbers outlined in oranger set off the rest of the look nicely.  It's classy.  And it's much better than the same look with the Groh-era uniforms, because those blue pants were ugly (although the striped socks that went with them were sharper than sharp.)

-- Blue-blue-white


George Welsh introduced the look and used it for the latter part of his tenure.  Al Groh continued it for the full length of his time.  And ever since Mike London took over, in his three years, we've worn this twice.  That is a crime.  It's classy, it's classic, it had become ours, it can't be improved upon, and it's been tossed by the wayside.  Booooooooooo.

-- Blue-blue-orange


I'll admit, I had some hopes for this one when the uniforms were first introduced.  They came out in blue-white, white-orange, and orange-blue back then, so this one wasn't shown, but I thought it could be a good one.  It's not.  It's kind of a dud.  There's nothing really egregiously wrong with it, but the top clashes with the bottom.  Would white stripes on the pants help?  Maybe, but probably not.

-- Blue-orange-white


This is another one that had tons of potential, but falls flat.  It's better than blue-blue-orange, but in the end it kind of looks like a practice getup.  It's too much of a mishmash to work as a regular, everyday uniform, but is probably fine for ESPN3 games against out-of-conference soup cans.  Like above.

THE MANY-WORN

-- Blue-blue-blue


I saved the worst for first.  All-one-color uniforms almost never look good.  All-white like Texas or Penn State makes you look like Casper the Friendly Ghost.  All-orange or red or something looks absolutely horrible.  All-dark, like this, is as good as it gets, but it still looks bad.  This has been worn three times, once each season of the London era.

-- Blue-white-orange


This too has been worn three times, and I wish it were more.  I realize it violates everything I've said before about pant stripes and matching things to other things and I don't care.  Something about this just pops.  The team looks damn good in this, and I wouldn't be that upset if they never wore anything else on the road.

-- Blue-white-white


The team chose this look for every road game last year but one (the first one.)  And while I appreciate the nod to the old school, this was much better during the Groh years when the pants had a big thick stripe to offset all that white.  Part of the reason Texas looks so crappy in all-white is because they have no stripe on the pants.  We barely have any.  A dark-colored helmet saves the combo, and there's nothing offensive about it, but it's just too much white.

-- Blue-orange-blue


The team chose this look so often I thought it was gonna end up being the default home jersey.  You could do worse.  A lot worse, actually; this is a solid set.  Again, you've got the pants matching the helmet and the jersey numbers matching the logo, mostly.  Orange accents on the helmet and pants let the jersey go to work on the eyes. I like it.

*****************************************************

The verdicts in, this is the final tally:

THE UGLY

-- Orange-orange-orange
-- Orange-white-white
-- Orange-blue-blue
-- Blue-orange-orange

These are in no particular order, because ugly is ugly.  Anyone suggesting we wear these combos should be slapped.

THE BAD

-- Orange-blue-white (a)
-- Orange-white-blue (a)
-- Orange-white-orange (a)
-- Orange-orange-blue (b)
-- Blue-orange-white (b)
-- Blue-white-white (b)
-- Blue-blue-orange (b)
-- Blue-blue-blue (c)
-- Orange-orange-white (c)

These range from those we've never worn and don't need to bother with except for maybe once to satisfy curiosity (a) to those that don't really look bad but don't look that great either and are therefore extraneous (b) to those that actually do look kind of bad (c).

THE GOOD

-- Blue-blue-white
-- Blue-white-orange
-- Blue-white-blue
-- Blue-orange-blue
-- Orange-blue-orange

And if it were up to me, this is how we'd roll.  Blue, blue, and white for your basic, everyday, ACC Saturday.  White-over-blue and, especially, white-over-orange, on the road.  (The white pants would be fine too, if I'm being perfectly honest.)  Orange helmets with blue jerseys and orange pants for ESPN3 soup-can games against the Idahos and Eastern Michigans and Richmonds.  And blue-orange-blue for night-game specials.  (If on the road, those would be good games to break out the white shirts and orange pants.)  Nobody ever consults me on these things, and some people think that's a good thing.  I'll even admit to checking for the combo-of-the-week announcement, even when I think they ought to be cutting that shit out.  But you have to admit there's something to be said for a system.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

some stuff

Stuff goin' on - let's do a little catching up on it.

- Hat tip to Gobbler Country on this one; you can see a screenshot of the new football uniforms in action here. Screenshot because it's from NCAA '11. Picture #14 is what you want. There's only one problem: they messed them up. The players in the screenshot are wearing the NFL-style socks that disappeared along with most of the rest of Groh's additions to the look. (You have to admit, it probably looks better that way because there's hardly anything on the uniforms to break up all that white.) There's also no ACC patch, even though the rest of the depicted ACC teams have them. (Nutjob conspiracy theorists, you now have your flimsy ammunition: Big Ten teams wear no conference patch.) And I can't tell if there's an orange outline on the numbers, but if there's supposed to be, it's nowhere as distinguishable as it is on the real thing.

I still say this new look will be a lot better if we keep the white-on-white and blue-on-blue to a bare minimum.

- All-ACC baseball teams are out and the Hoos are very well represented. As you'd expect from the regular-season champion, no school has more players named than UVA does; seven in all with three on the first team (Arico, Gosselin, and ACCy Young winner Danny Hultzen) and four on the second team (Morey, Parker, Werman, and Cannon.)

- This has nothing at all to do with UVA athletics, but please oh please oh please let this guy's middle name be Maury.

- Speaking of baseball, the ACC tournament got off on the right foot for UVA with a 6-4 win over Boston College this afternoon. A game that was a little closer than we'd have liked to see means that top long reliever Tyler Wilson is now used up til Saturday and won't be available tomorrow. That puts a little more pressure on Morey to go a long way. However. Florida State lost to Miami today as well, so in all but the most unlikely of scenarios (that being BC winning both the rest of their games) UVA will have to beat Miami to play on Sunday. The flip side is that beating FSU tomorrow might not be absolutely necessary.

In fact, the strong possibility exists that it'll be totally meaningless. The early game tomorrow is Miami/BC. If Miami wins, the FSU game won't mean anything and the Miami game will determine the championship. Why? Say we lose to FSU but then beat Miami. Then we're 2-1, Miami is 2-1, and Florida State is either 2-1 (with a win over BC on Friday) or 1-2 (with a loss.) Either way, the tiebreakers break in our favor. If I were Brian O'Connor, I'd have both Morey and Kline (or Neal Davis) get ready and wait for the result of the early game before choosing a starter. Being able to save Morey for a possible Sunday game would be big. Reason not to: If he pitches on Sunday he won't be available for early NCAA regional games. Still, it's a strong consideration.

- Recruiting board update! It was getting a little old. It's also getting a little long. The evaluation period just finished up, and the coaches aimed the offer cannon out of state at players they were getting their first good looks at. Not a lot of players come off the board during this time, because they're getting flooded with offers and aren't narrowing things down yet. And they're taking SATs and ACTs and final exams, so campus visits are at a minimum. When the summer camp circuit and visit circuit fires up, that's when players will start knocking schools off their lists or make their commitments. So here are the updates - many more additions than removals:

- LB Daquan Romero (committed to UNC) and QB Gary Nova (Pitt) are the only removals.

- DT Vincent Croce is added to blue. Originally I figured his offer list was just entirely too big to even bother adding him, but what do you know, he has UVA in a top 3.

- TE Darius Redman, LB Nick Menocal, DEs Zach Wood and Stephon Sanders, and CB Blake Countess are added to yellow. All were beneficiaries of the offer gun. Menocal attends school in Florida with 2010 signee Pablo Alvarez.

- WR Tacoi Sumler is added to red. Sumler's offer list is divided into Volumes I, II, and III, it's that big, so we're not getting him, but he's a former teammate of early enrollee Michael Strauss, so hey, why not.

- Moved WR Dominique Terrell from yellow to red.

- Moved WR Daniel Adams from yellow to blue.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

fashion critic is critical

(Warning: in this post I turn into Bruno the fashion guy, only without the, uh, flamboyance. Skip it if you're the kind who doesn't care if the team comes out in lacy tutus as long as they win the game. Uni Watch fans may be more appreciative.)

We at UVA are not Michigan, Penn State, or Alabama: the football uniform changes. Nothing we have in that realm is so traditional or sacred as to be untouchable, and so, the general pattern has been more or less that when you change head coaches, you change uniforms. It's easy to identify the look by head coach: you've got Early Welsh, there's Late Welsh, there's Groh, and now there's London.

As it turns out, "Oregon of the East" was a massively inaccurate way to describe the uniform changes. We may not have a traditionally unified look throughout the ages, but we do have a tradition of not looking like we were outfitted by chimpanzees with ADD and a crayon, so the idea of copycatting Oregon was not real enticing. And the team is outfitted by Nike, so you never know if you're going to wake up in September and your team is suddenly wearing sports bras; Nike's really ugly like that sometimes. Fortunately, the look is exactamundo opposite of Nike's usual bizarredom. It's throwbacky. I ganked a couple pictures off the official site so you can use them for reference from here on out instead of flipping back and forth:







I like the look. I liked the old look, too, but this was the kind of coaching change where you just need a clean break and a totally fresh start, and keeping around the hugest visual reminder of the old regime wouldn't have been healthy at all. What do I like?

- First off, I have plenty of nitpicks, and there are a few mistakes. But the overall approach is a winner: a little too plain and boring is way, way preferable to going overboard with the wackiness. Gotta appreciate the simplicity.

- I love the orange jersey, especially with the blue pants. That's gonna look pretty cool. And since orange-on-orange is not a likely combo (good thing because we'd look like traffic cones), I suspect it'll become a favorite look of mine.

- I like that we can do a lot of color combos and still look like Virginia. Once again in contrast to Oregon, which might at any given time wear silver and black, but not to pick on just them: plenty of schools out there are in the habit of wearing things that make you look twice just to make sure who's playing. No matter what we'll still look like Virginia.

- We kept the helmet basically the same. I'm one of the few who liked the goat horns, but the main thing is the V-sabre, which remains one of sports' coolest logos; keeping it on the helmet was critical.

- The switch to black shoes. White shoes looked fine with the old unis but they wouldn't have been real good here.

- Blue pants that at least match the blue jersey. I hated those old blue pants. Good idea, poorly executed.

- Keeping names on the jersey. Groh put them there and as a still-new UVA fan, I was glad he did. Some think non-named jerseys foster a sense of team over individual - I think it makes you look like you can't afford custom nameplates.

- Keeping the single, blue helmet. The helmet is a much stronger piece of the program's brand than the rest of the uniform and I prefer having just one. Helps keep things unified.

What I could do without:

- The butt-stripe. It's just unnecessary and kind of ugly.

- Monochrome combos. There's a good reason Jeff White suggested orange-on-orange isn't likely, and thank God for that. But blue-on-blue or white-on-white isn't going to look a lot better, because the pants are way too plain for it. The old white-on-white looked good because of the classy-looking stripe on the white pants. These aren't gonna look as good.

- All this PRO COMBAT! hype about stupid shit like the titanium belt buckles. Really? There's this huge noticable difference in how fast the team runs and how hard they hit because their belt buckles are three ounces lighter? Bite me.

I'm not just Mr. Criticism here. I have ideas, too. A couple things here - let's call them missed opportunities - could have made a very good thing even better:

- Blue numbers outlined in orange don't look great for the white jersey. Orange outlined in blue is the way to go. Blue helmet, blue pants, white jersey, orange numbers - that looks sharp.

- Sticking with the numbers theme, the block numbers do look nice. But UVA's been on a little bit of a common-branding kick lately - that's why the men's basketball team changed unis a couple years back to look the same as the women. That "VIRGINIA" font they're using shows up all over; in fact, you can see Mike London up there ensuring the world can see it prominently displayed on Marc Verica's butt. (OK, back of his waistline.)

But anyway, numbers. Seems to me they missed an opportunity - the basketball numbers would have looked pretty good on this uniform, for a little bit of style. UVA football still has never dressed better than 1998 and 1999 when those fancier numbers were on the jersey. (Also, the collar and sleeve accents on those unis were really cool.) I was juuuust a touch disappointed when I walked into Scott for the first time, saw kids and folks with those #6 Thomas Jones jerseys with the cool numbers, and then the team came out in boring block numbers. (And they ditched the blue pants that season, too.)

But nothing's perfect. And the neat thing about this is that everyone's gonna have a favorite look. Some will prefer the standard blue-on-white - what with the lack of goat horns on the helmet and the orange-outlined numbers, it bears a very strong resemblence to the 94-97 look. Me, I like the orange-on-blue. Nine different looks means something for everyone.

Bottom line is, the whole deal is a near-perfect combination of the fresh start that UVA needed and yet a continuation of a tradition of looking classy on the field. Thumbs-up from this observer.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

baseball at the halfway point

Yeah, it's about halfway through the season already, and that's including the ACC tournament which I'm expecting will include Virginia. I don't think that's too presumptuous of me, as this is a team that's gotten a nice taste of life at the top, having been ranked #1 for about a month and a half by a couple different publications. I'm content with top-5 for now, since the main point is to host not just a regional but a super-regional. I don't even mind if the team doesn't finish #1 in the ACC standings; in fact, I'd prefer they didn't, because there are five really good teams in the ACC and three of them will be on the 1-4-5-8 side of the tournament.

Plan of action is simple today: the good and the bad of the first half. No ugly. Teams that spend most of the first half ranked #1 get to skip the ugly. Also, bad first. So you get to leave on a high note.

SURPRISINGLY BAD:

- Walks. Especially Tyler Wilson's.

I mean, he's issued a lot of them. Last year he was a very, very dependable pitcher in long relief. This year he's unhittable - opposing batters are hitting .181 - but they get on base via free pass almost more often than by hitting their way there. Against NC State on Sunday, he walked two batters, let them both score, took the loss, and saw his ERA skyrocket north of four.

And against JMU, the team combined to walk 14 hitters. Yikes.

This hasn't been an all-season thing, only a late trend. But it's got to stop before this weekend, because Georgia Tech bombs home runs like they're hitting fungos. And Wilson's been too inconsistent in general this year.

- Franco Valdes.

His light hitting is edging him out of the lineup. Ideally he would hit well enough to lock down the catching duties, letting John Hicks play more first base, and give us that extra flexibility at the DH and with pinch hitters. When Hicks catches, it robs us of a pinch hitter. Unfortunately, Valdes has just 11 hits in 15 games all season.

- Starting pitching on days other than Friday or Saturday.

Cody Winiarski earned himself a reprieve, I think, by locking down Boston College and Clemson, but returned to his excessively hittable ways last Sunday against NC State. He has a team-worst - and that's also including non-eligible pitchers - opposing BA of .315, and carries a 1.67 WHIP. Half a season is a very small sample size for a pitcher, but at this point I'll be genuinely surprised if a future Sunday doesn't see a different starter.

Not that Will Roberts or Branden Kline have been otherwordly and impressive either; in fact, Roberts didn't even get out of the first inning against JMU yesterday. If they had been, one of them would likely already be starting Sundays. But they're slowly improving - Kline, I believe, faster than Roberts - and one of them is likely to get a later-season chance. And they're definitely going to have to step up and face some ACC competition come tournament time.

- Jarrett Parker's bat.

Solid....ish. But solid is way below last year's performance when he missed the team Triple Crown by .001 worth of BA and led every other hitting category imaginable.

- Shane Halley's injury.

Argh. Halley missed a lot of the season after separating a shoulder warming up for the very first game. Now that he's back, hopefully it'll settle the bullpen down a bit.

SURPRISINGLY GOOD:

- Danny Hultzen.

OK, we knew he'd be a monster on the mound, but this damn good? I could maybe rattle off a bunch of stats (1.57 ERA, .161 opponents' BA, 55 Ks against 8 walks, that sort of thing) but then again we could do that all day. Against Florida State, he struck out six and allowed two hits and no runs in six innings - that's when you knew he was legit. GT looms as an even bigger challenge, but it's safe to say now that Hultzen belongs in the conversation with the best pitchers in the country.

- The non-everyday hitters.

We're talking Werman, Swab, Bruno here. John Barr, too, and even Reed Gragnani. These guys platoon and pinch-hit their way to at-bats, and they're a terror on bullpens. Championship teams don't have holes in the lineup, and these are the guys ensuring that we don't. Not only have they hit everything they're put in front of, but they give Brian O'Connor a remarkable amount of lineup flexibility, because they're spread all over the field and in that bunch there are both lefties and righties.

- Branden Kline's improvement.

OK, there was a little hiccup against Towson last week. But the trend here has been one of game-to-game improvement for Kline, one of the biggest recruits we've had in a while. His first appearance and first start were awful. Since then he's shown every sign of figuring out the college game, and if (or more likely, when) O'Connor decides to look for a new third weekend starter, my money's on Kline to get the call. Continued improvement would be one of the best developments we could have for tournament play.

Of course, there's a lot more good than that going on. The hitting is as good as ever. So are the gloves. Terrific hitting, top-notch defense, and mostly-good pitching is a recipe for tournament success. Now, if I had one wish, it'd be for a solid third starter, and if I had another, it'd be for consistency out of the bullpen. And yes, the top two issues with this team are pitching, and no, that's not good, but the important thing is we have the talent to make them both happen, and we're moving in that direction. There's not a single ACC team we can't take 2 of 3 from. And if things go the way they should, and Tim Weiser is given a one-way plane ticket to Botswana around selection time, we'll play the first two rounds of the NCAA tournament at friendly Davenport.

Final note, having nothing to do with baseball and everything to do with new football uniforms: Look for them on Friday. Please oh please oh please do not be ugly. A lot of folks say "it doesn't matter what they look like as long as they play well while wearing them." To that I say: would you replace all the brick buildings on Central Grounds with modern, Frank Gehry steel? Tear down Old Dorms and put up a high-rise? Would you ever get away with saying, "it doesn't matter what the buildings look like as long as the teaching and learning is first-class?" UVA's not UVA if it doesn't look like UVA; and no, I'm not saying the current unis have the historical cachet of the Grounds themselves, but I'd rather not look like a clown show. Again.

Monday, November 10, 2008

weekend review

First things first. Suggestions have been made, suggestions have been received, and this week's Blogpoll ballot is duly fixed. Scroll down some or just click here to have a look-see.

Now, me, I'm something of a uniform snob. I think an ugly uniform is an abomination. I mean, I hate to get all fashion-designer, but the uniform is important. It's one of the primary representations of your team. So I'd be remiss in failing to throw in my two bits on the new duds that the basketball team showed off in last night's exhibition. I wonder, first off, which of the powers that be decided the men's team ought to look like the women's. Don't get me wrong. It's a sharp look. I like it. I especially like the new fancy-font numbers instead of the block ones. I liked the old jersey, though, too. I'm just not sure why we have to keep switching. Hell, I'd have been happy if they'd kept the ones that we had back in the Donald Hand days when I found myself a wide-eyed first year on Grounds. These ones are sharp, so let's hope they decide to keep 'em for a decade or two, because there's something to be said for an identity.

At least some things don't change. The Put Lars In guy is still there, undeterred by the fact that Lars is not.

The Clemson game two weeks from now: Noon, Raycom.

As ever, the recruits and their weekends:

DOMINIQUE WALLACE: As ever, a beast. How does 208 yards and five touchdowns strike you? Chancellor finished the regular season unbeaten and host Courtland in a playoff game next week.

ROSS METHENY: Uh, still sidelined. He'll be, quote, "jogging in January", and Sherando's season is over.

OSCAR SMITH BOYS: Kind of a raggedy game for OS - they merely doubled their opponents' score. Perry Jones ran for 361 yards (about 80% of his team's total) and Tim Smith had a pick 6 as Oscar Smith got out of the first round against Woodside.

TUCKER WINDLE: Caught a TD pass in Charlotte Catholic's win to end the regular season. Playoffs will follow for CC as well; they are the #1 seed in their division.

ALEX OWAH: 14 carries, 200 yards, 4 TDs as Harrisonburg eliminated William Byrd.

Nothing new on the recruiting front, except for the one thing that you probably already knew: one of the big kahunas, Logan Thomas, is a Hokie. Bleah. The recruiting board is updated accordingly.

So, some stuff happened around the ACC, and we're going to let these other guys tell you about it:

Bad Maryland showed up in Blacksburg on Thursday, and predictably, got wrecked. 23-13 doesn't really tell the story right - it wasn't really that close. Sadly, there was no meteor strike. Gobbler Country gives a rare shout-out to Stiney.

GT got pretty much stomped by UNC. With this post - barely fully-formed sentences abound -you can kind of imagine Winfield of The LegacyX4 slumped in his seat, refusing food. You kind of want to take the guy some hot chocolate or something. By the way, they've also got the ACC Roundtable wrapup posted, so go check that out.

BC won the Catholic showdown against Notre Dame in defensively stylish fashion. BC Interruption would like to never ever ever see a kicker trot out onto the field again this season.