| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama | |
| 2 | Florida | |
| 3 | Texas | |
| 4 | Boise State | |
| 5 | TCU | |
| 6 | Ohio State | |
| 7 | Iowa | |
| 8 | Cincinnati | |
| 9 | Georgia Tech | |
| 10 | Penn State | |
| 11 | Oregon | |
| 12 | Virginia Tech | |
| 13 | Nebraska | |
| 14 | Wisconsin | |
| 15 | Pittsburgh | |
| 16 | Miami (Florida) | |
| 17 | Mississippi | |
| 18 | Brigham Young | |
| 19 | LSU | |
| 20 | Utah | |
| 21 | Central Michigan | |
| 22 | Oklahoma State | |
| 23 | Navy | |
| 24 | Clemson | |
| 25 | West Virginia | |
| Last week's ballot | ||
Dropped Out: Arizona (#15), Oregon State (#16), Stanford (#24).
Couple thoughts:
- I don't like to give the SEC the satisfaction, and I like Texas quite a bit, but there's no real reason to keep Texas above Florida. Just because they were in the BCS CG? Look at it like this: Both were decisively beaten by Alabama, so look at their most recent non-Bama games. UT squeeeezed past Nebraska and needed a little friendliness from the clock operator to do it; Florida crapped on a previously unbeaten team.
- Anyone, media members who whine about wanting a playoff especially, who 1) complain that a playoff is unfair to undefeated teams like Boise State, and 2) ranked Boise State anywhere below third, is a raging hypocrite, and disingenuous at that. If Boise State really is this year's poster child for Screwed-Over Teams That Deserved A Playoff, why would you rank them so low? Probably because complaining that Florida got screwed over doesn't resonate with the gimme-playoff masses that want that little mid-major hero to rally around. That they were fourth - not even third the way Auburn was in '04 - in the rankings is evidence enough to me that they weren't actually screwed over; after all, a fourth-place ranking means there were plenty of voters who must have ranked them even lower.
No comments:
Post a Comment